Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Users online: 42
Scientific Publication of the Indian Pharmaceutical Association
Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size
The Journal Search Current Issue Archives Instructions Online submission Login  


 
RESEARCH PAPER
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 69  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 511-514
Formulation and evaluation of microspheres of diltiazem hydrochloride


Department of Pharmaceutics, C. L. Baid Mehta College of Pharmacy, Thoraipakkam, Chennai - 600 096, India

Date of Submission16-May-2006
Date of Decision02-Apr-2007
Date of Acceptance08-Jul-2007

Correspondence Address:
M Nappinnai
Department of Pharmaceutics, C. L. Baid Mehta College of Pharmacy, Thoraipakkam, Chennai - 600 096
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0250-474X.36935

Get Permissions

   Abstract 

Microspheres of diltiazem hydrochloride were formulated using combination of polyethylene glycol 6000 and Eudragit RS 100 and Eudragit RS 100 alone by solvent evaporation and non-solvent addition methods with an aim to prolong its release. Six formulations prepared by using different drug to polymer ratios, were evaluated for relevant parameters and compared with marketed SR capsules. Depending upon the drug to polymer ratio, the entrapment, loading and encapsulation were found to range between 77.450.22 to 91.080.62% , 34.760.15 to 52.460.25% and 66.090.19 to 82.7 0.57%, respectively. The microspheres were spherical, discrete and compact and size distribution was between 4 to 24 m. In vitro studies were carried out at different pH for a period of 12 h and compared with marketed formulation. As similarity factor f2 was 92.8 for FVI, it was subjected to further study. Formulations prepared using the combination of the retardants exhibited first order of drug release and zero order for preparations containing Eudragit RS 100 alone. The analysis of regression values of Higuchi plot and Korsmeyer-Peppas plot and "n" values of Korsmeyer-Peppas model suggested a combination of diffusional and dissolutional mechanism indicating the drug release from the formulations was controlled by more than one process. Drug polymer interaction was absent as evidenced by FT-IR and DSC thermograms. In vivo pharmacokinetic study of the formulation proved that prolongation of drug release was obtained by formulating as microspheres.


Keywords: Diltiazem hydrochloride, microspheres, Eudragit RS 100, PEG 6000, in vitro, in vivo evaluation.


How to cite this article:
Nappinnai M, Kishore V S. Formulation and evaluation of microspheres of diltiazem hydrochloride. Indian J Pharm Sci 2007;69:511-4

How to cite this URL:
Nappinnai M, Kishore V S. Formulation and evaluation of microspheres of diltiazem hydrochloride. Indian J Pharm Sci [serial online] 2007 [cited 2014 Jul 29];69:511-4. Available from: http://www.ijpsonline.com/text.asp?2007/69/4/511/36935


Diltiazem hydrochloride, a calcium channel blocker is available as sustained release preparation and literature reports many different sustained release formulations [1] . Eudragit RS 100 has not been reported in preparation of diltiazem hydrochloride microspheres and its suitability was evaluated in this work. PEG 6000 is generally associated with solubilisation but at high concentrations may act as retardant [2] . In this work a combination of both the materials was evaluated.


   Materials and Methods Top


Diltiazem hydrochloride was obtained as gift sample from Mano pharmaceuticals, Chennai. Eudragit RS 100 was purchased from Colorcon Asia, Mumbai. All other chemicals used were of analytical grade. Twelve male white rabbits weighing about 2.8 kg to 3.1 kg were used in the in vivo study.

Formulation:

All the formulations were prepared according to the formulae given in [Table - 1]. Solvent evaporation method was adopted for preparing formulations I, II, III which contains both Eudragit RS 100 and PEG 6000. A homogenous mixture of the polymers was made in acetone. Diltiazem hydrochloride was then added to the polymer solution. The resulting mixture was then poured in liquid paraffin while stirring continuously. Stirring was continued for 1 h, until acetone evaporated completely. The microspheres formed were collected by filtration, washed 4-5 times with petroleum ether and dried at room temperature for 24 h [2] . Coacervation-phase separation by the addition of non-solvent was followed for formulations IV, V, VI. Eudragit RS100 was dissolved in warm toluene to get homogenous polymer solution. The drug was then added to the polymer solution and mixed thoroughly with the aid of mechanical stirrer for 10 min. Coacervation was then induced by the addition of petroleum ether slowly over a period of 20 min while stirring at the same speed. After rigidisation, the encapsulated product was collected by filtration and dried at room temperature for 24 h [3] .

Determination of drug entrapment, loading and encapsulation efficiency:

An aliquot of 100 mg of micro spheres was triturated with distilled water. The volume was made up to 100 ml with distilled water and was sonicated for 2 h. It was then filtered to remove debris and the absorbance was measured by using Shimadzu UV/Vis spectrophotometer (UV-1601) at 236 nm. Quantitative estimation of diltiazem hydrochloride was calculated by using equation obtained by linear regression analysis of the calibration data of diltiazem hydrochloride in distilled water [4] . Results are shown in [Table - 1]. The drug loading in microspheres was estimated using the formula, L=Qm/Wm100, where L is the percentage of loading of microspheres, W m is the weight of the microspheres; Q m is the quantity of the drug present in W m of microspheres. The amount of drug encapsulation in the microspheres was determined using the formula, E=Qp/Qt100, where E is the percentage of encapsulation of microspheres; Q p is the product of drug content per g of microspheres and yield of microspheres in g [5] . Results are shown in [Table - 1].

In vitro release studies:

In vitro release profile of diltiazem hydrochloride from the preparations was examined in pH 1.2 buffer from 0-2 h, in pH 4.5 phosphate buffer from 2 to 4 h and in phosphate buffer pH 7.2 from 4 to 12 h using the rotating basket method specified in USP XXI at 100 rpm. Microspheres equivalent to 90 mg of drug were placed in the basket and the medium was maintained at 370.5 o C. An aliquot of 10 ml were withdrawn periodically at intervals of one h and same volume of fresh medium was replaced. The concentration of the drug released at different time intervals was determined by measuring the absorbance at 236 nm [6] . Graphical representation of result is indicated in [Figure - 1].

Similarity factor:

The dissolution data was subjected for determining f 2 values by using the formula, f2=50log {1+ (1/n)E τ=1n (Rt -Tt ) 2} -0.5 100

Release kinetics:

Data obtained from dissolution studies was fitted to various kinetic equations. The kinetic models used were a zero order equation [5] (Q=Q o -k o t), first order equation [6] (Ln Q=Ln Q o - k 1 t) and Higuchi's equation [7] (Q=k h t) ), Korsmeyer-Peppas equation [3] log Q t vs.log t, where Q t , is the cumulative amount of drug released at time t and Q 0 is the initial amount of drug present in microspheres. k 0 is the zero order release rate constant, k 1 is the first order release rate constant, and k h is the diffusion rate constant. [8]

Particle size analysis and scanning electron microscopy (SEM):

Particle size analysis was carried out by optical microscopy. About 200 microspheres were selected randomly and their size was determined using optical microscope fitted with a standard micrometer scale. For F VI exhibiting best in vitro release profile SEM was carried out [3] .

FT-IR analysis and DSC:

Infrared spectra of F-VI were recorded on Bomem MB-II FT-IR spectrometer. DSC thermogram of F-VI was recorded on a scanning calorimeter equipped with a thermal analysis data system (Perkin-Elmer DSC-7) [3].

In vivo release studies:

Study was approved by IAEC (Approval Number: XI-8, CLBMCP-2004-2005). Male white rabbits weighing about 2.8 kg to 3.1 kg were used in this study. The animals were housed under standard environmental conditions (232˚; 555% relative humidity; 12 h light/dark cycle). Prior to oral administration the rabbits were starved for 24 h and are allowed free access to tap water only. The animals (12) were divided into two groups of 6 each. To group I (standard group), marketed diltiazem hydrochloride capsule was administered. To the group II (test group) prepared microspheres (Formulation-VI) was administered. The capsule/microspheres were administered to the rabbit by gastric intubation method [9] . Blood samples (1 ml) were withdrawn from the marginal ear vein of the rabbit at regular interval of 2 h for period of 12 h. The plasma samples were separated by centrifugation and assayed for diltiazem hydrochloride by high performance liquid chromatography reported elsewhere [9] . Results of in vivo tests given in [Table - 2].


   Results and Discussion Top


The drug entrapment was maximum in F-VI (91.080.62%), drug loading was maximum in F-IV (52.460.25%), and drug encapsulation was maximum in F-VI (82.700.57%). Dissolution test results show that increase in polymer concentration of Eudragit RS 100, decreased rate of drug release from the microspheres, whereas increasing PEG 6000 actually increased the drug release. Comparison of dissolution pattern of test formulations with marketed diltiazem hydrochloride sustained release capsules, showed that F-VI exhibited similar release pattern of marketed SR capsules. The f 2 value was 92.8. Log percentage of drug remaining versus time curves exhibited straight line for the formulations (I, II, III) and confirmed that the release rates followed first order. Cumulative percentage of drug release versus time curves exhibited straight line for the formulations (IV, V, VI) and confirmed that the release rates followed zero order kinetics. Cumulative percentage of drug release versus square root of time curves shows linearity and it proves that all the formulations follows Higuchi model, suggesting that diffusion may be the mechanism of drug release. The correlation values of Higuchi′s plot of formulation VI and diltiazem hydrochloride SR capsule were found to be 0.9697 and 0.9616, respectively. Log cumulative percentage of drug release versus log time curves shows high linearity and it proves that all the formulations follow Korsmeyer-Peppas model. The correlation values of Korsmeyer-Peppas plot of formulation VI and diltiazem hydrochloride marketed SR capsule were found to be 0.9864 and 0.9877, respectively. The slope values of Korsmeyer-Peppas plot of formulation VI and diltiazem hydrochloride marketed SR capsule were found to be 0.6448 and 0.0.7016, respectively. The diffusion exponent of release profile (slope) has a value of 0.6447 (n>0.5), which indicates a zero order release controlled by non Fickian diffusion .The analysis of regression values of Higuchi plot and Korsemeyer-Peppas plot and "n" values of Korsmeyer-Peppas model shows a combination of diffusional and dissolutional mechanism indicating the drug release from the formulations was controlled by more than one process. The particle size of F-VI was found to be in the range of 4 μm to 24 μm. The surface morphology of prepared microspheres observed under a scanning electron microscopy, showed good spherical geometry as evidenced by the photographs [Figure - 2]. The microspheres were discrete, spherical and uniform. Determination of interaction between drug and polymer were performed using FT-IR and by DSC for F-VI. FT-IR spectra study showed no change in the fingerprint of pure drug spectra, thus confirming absence of drug to polymer interactions (Figures may be reproduced on request). A sharp endotherm was observed for diltiazem hydrochloride at 213.17 o . This melting endotherm was also observed for F IV at 212.32 o , indicating absence of drug to polymer interactions. In vivo result analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters revealed that t max of reference and test formulations were the same (t max 6 h).The observed values for C max were 259.32.19 and 261.51.34 ng/ml for reference and F-VI respectively. The observed values for AUC 0-α were 1294.817.67 and 1274.57.5 ng-h/ml for reference and F-VI, respectively. The observed values for AUMC0-α were 822190.16 and 7966.632.01 ng-h(h/ml) for reference and F VI, respectively. Statistical analysis by performing t-test (p<0.05) proved that there was significant difference between test formulation and reference. From the results it was observed that formulation VI was suitable for sustained / prolonged therapeutic effect. The microspheres showed same mean residence time (MRT) when compared with marketed diltiazem hydrochloride SR capsule. From the present study it may be concluded that diltiazem hydrochloride can be formulated as prolonged/sustained release drug delivery system (microspheres) with Eudragit RS 100.

 
   References Top

1.Bhalerao SS, Lalla JK, Rane MS. Study of processing parameters influencing the properties of diltiazem hydrochloride. J Microencap 2001;18:299-307.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Bhalerao SS, Lalla JK, Rane MS. A study of electrokinetic and stability property of suspension of diltiazem hydrochloride microcapsule. Indian Drugs 2001;38:464-7.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Chowdary KP, Ramesh KV. Studies on microencapsulation of diltiazem. J Pharm Sci 1993;55:52-4.   Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Reddy MN, Shriwaikar AA. Rosin, a polymer for microencapsulation of diltiazem hydrochloride for sustained release by emulsion-solvent evaporation technique. Indian J Pharm Sci 2000;62:308-10.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Saravanan M, Dhanraj MD, Sridhar SK, Ramachandran S, Sam SK, Rao SG. Preparation, characterization and in vitro release kinetics of ibuprofen polystyrene microspheres. Indian J Pharm Sci 2004;66:287-92.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Pandey VP, Manavalan R, Sundarrajan T, Ganesh KS. Formulation and release characteristics of sustained release diltiazem hydrochloride tablets. Indian J Pharm Sci 2003;65:44-8.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Ishikawa T, Watanabe Y, Takayama K, Endo H, Matsumoto M. Effect of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) on the release profiles and bioavailability of a poorly water-soluble drug from tablets prepared using macrogol and HPMC. Int J Pharm 2000;202:173-8.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
8.Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained-action medication -theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci 1963;52:1145-9.   Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  
9. Wagner JG. Interpretation of percent dissolved-time plots derived from in vitro testing of conventional tablets and capsules. J Pharm Sci 1969;58:1253-7.  Back to cited text no. 9    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1], [Table - 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Fabrication and Evaluation of Tinidazole Microbeads for Colon Targeting
Amit K. Pandey,Niharika Choudhary,Vineet K. Rai,Harinath Dwivedi,Koshy M. Kymonil,Shubhini A. Saraf
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2012; 2: S197
[Pubmed]
2 Development of oral multi particulate drug delivery system of galantamine hydrobromide by using extrusion spheronization technique
Jagadeesh, T., Bala Ramesha Chary, R.
International Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2011; 3(2): 2633-2643
[Pubmed]
3 Fabrication and characterization of algino-carbopol microparticulate system of aceclofenac for oral sustained drug delivery
Chakraborty, S., Dinda, S.C., Patra, C.N., Khandai, M.
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 2010; 4(2): 192-199
[Pubmed]
4 Formulation and in vitro evaluation of natural polymers based microspheres for colonic drug delivery
Mazumder, R., Nath, L.K., Haque, A., Maity, T., Choudhuy, P.K., Shrestha, B., Chakraborty, M., Pal, R.N.
International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2010; 2(1): 211-219
[Pubmed]
5 Multiparticulate system for colon targeted delivery of ondansetron
Jose, S., Dhanya, K., Cinu, T.A., Aleykutty, N.A.
Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2010; 72(1): 58-64
[Pubmed]
6 Design and evaluation of niacin microspheres
Maravajhala, V., Dasari, N., Sepuri, A., Joginapalli, S.
Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2009; 71(6): 663-669
[Pubmed]
7 Poly(MAA-co-AN) hydrogels with improved mechanical properties for theophylline controlled delivery
Luo, Y., Zhang, K., Wei, Q., Liu, Z., Chen, Y.
Acta Biomaterialia. 2009; 5(1): 316-327
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
   
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (273 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Materials and Me...
    Results and Disc...
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed14014    
    Printed160    
    Emailed26    
    PDF Downloaded1402    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 7    

Recommend this journal