Ascorbic acid inhibits development of tolerance and dependence to opiates in mice: Possible glutamatergic or dopaminergic modulation

*Corresponding Author:

S. K. Kulkarni
Pharmacology Division, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh - 160 014, India
E-mail: skpu@yahoo.com

Abstract

In a recent study, it has been demonstrated that ascorbic acid possessed antidopaminergic activity and modulate the glutamatergic neurotransmission in mice. With this background, the present study was undertaken to study the effect of ascorbic acid on the development of tolerance and dependence to opiate and its mechanism of action. Male Swiss mice weighing 20-25 g were used in the present study. Mice were made physically dependent on opioid by the chronic administration of morphine (10 mg/kg, twice a day, for 9 days) intraperitoneally. Ascorbic acid, haloperidol (dopamine antagonist) or MK 801 (NMDA receptor antagonist) was administered daily for 9 d before challenging the animals with morphine. The development of tolerance was assessed by noting the tail-flick latency on day 1, 3, 9 and 10. On the 10 th day after the measurement of tail-flick latency, animals were challenged with naloxone (2 mg/kg., i.p.) and incidence of escape jumps were recorded by placing the animals in 45 cm high plexiglass container. Ascorbic acid (400-1600 mg/kg) dose dependently inhibited development of tolerance and dependence to morphine as noted from tail-flick latency. When given along with MK 801 (0.01 mg/kg., i.p) or haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg i.p.), ascorbic acid (800 mg/kg., i.p.) potentiated the response of MK 801 or haloperidol. In conclusion, it is hypothesized that inhibition of development of tolerance and dependence to morphine by ascorbic acid appears to have two components, namely dopaminergic and glutamatergic.

Keywords

Ascorbic acid, tolerance, dependence, dopamine, glutamate

Various reports have confirmed the involvement of excitatory amino acids (EAA) in morphine tolerance and dependence [1]. Non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist (like MK 801) and competitive NMDA receptor antagonist (like LY 274614) blocked morphine tolerance and dependence in rats [2,3]. Besides, in morphine tolerant and abstinent rats, binding of [³H] MK 801 in the presence of glutamate and glycine is decreased in some brain regions [4,5], however, in the absence of glutamate and glycine, binding of [³H] MK 801 decreased modestly only in the cortex [6]. These data suggest that activities of endogenous glutamate and glycine are perhaps altered following activation of NMDA receptors in chronic morphine-treated animals. Ascorbic acid (AA) is shown to regulate NMDA receptor activity. Through the redox phenomena, AA has inhibitory role on NMDA receptor functioning [7]. Also, a growing body of research indicates that ascorbic acid is capable of modulating the effects of dopamine in the mammalian forebrain. Ascorbic acid enhanced the effect of catalepsy produced by dopaminergic antagonists as well as various nitric oxide synthase inhibitors [8,9]. Also ascorbic acid blocked the amphetamine-induced turning behaviours in rats with unilateral nigrostriatal lesion produced by 6-hydroxydopamine [10]. These findings coupled with inhibition of dopamineric agonists and antagonists in radioligand binding studies suggested antidopaminergic-like action of ascorbic acid. Recently, we have shown that ascorbic acid potentates the antipsychotic activity of both typical and atypical antipsychotics thus possessing antidopaminergic effect [9]. Thus, it was hypothesized that ascorbic acid has protective effect in the development of tolerance and dependence by modifying the dopaminergic or glutamatergic neurotransmission. With this background, ascorbic acid was tested for its ability to prevent the development of tolerance and dependence to opioids in mice and also to understand the possible mechanism of its action.

Materials and Methods

The following drugs were used: Ascorbic acid (S. D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai, India), MK 801 [(+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydroxy-5H-dibenzo(a,d)cyclo-hepten- 5,10-imine], (Merck, Sharp and Dohme, England), haloperidol (Searle, Skokie, IL, USA), and morphine (Government Analytical Laboratory, Chandigarh). Haloperidol was dissolved in few drops of glacial acetic acid while morphine was dissolved in a few drops of dilute hydrochloric acid and volume made with distilled water. All the drugs were freshly prepared and administered intraperitoneally in a constant volume of 1 ml/100 g of body weight.

Male Swiss mice weighing between 20-25 g were obtained from the disease free small animal house, Hissar. The animals were housed under standard laboratory conditions and maintained on natural light and dark cycle and had free access to food and water. Animals were acclimatized to laboratory conditions before the experiment. Each animal was used only once. All the experiments were carried out between 0900 and 1500 h. The experimental protocols were approved by Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) and conducted according to the Indian National Science Academy (INSA) Guidelines for the use and care of experimental animals.

Experimental procedure

The development of tolerance was assessed by tail- flick latency [11] and as modified by Kulkarni [12], while dependence was quantified by naloxone-precipitated withdrawal syndrome. The experimental protocol was the same as described by Kulkarni and Verma [13]. The animals were randomly divided into following groups: (i) saline: saline, (ii) saline: morphine (iii) ascorbic acid alone or in combination with other drugs (MK 801 or haloperidol): morphine (iv) ascorbic acid alone or in combination with other drugs (MK 801 or haloperidol). Ascorbic acid alone or with MK 801 or haloperidol was administered 30 min prior to morphine from days 1 to 9. Tail-flick latency was calculated on day 1, 3, 9 and 10. On day10, treatments were reversed such that, the animals that received, ascorbic acid alone or with MK 801 or haloperidol followed by morphine from day 1 to 9 were challenged with morphine alone and animals that received ascorbic acid alone or with MK 801 or haloperidol from day 1 to 9 were challenged with ascorbic acid alone or in combination with MK 801 or haloperidol followed by morphine. Immediately after the measurement of tail- flick latency, animals were challenged with naloxone (2 mg/kg., i.p.) and incidence of escape jumps were recorded in 45 cm high plexiglass container.

Statistical analysis

Data expressed as mean ± SEM was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s t-test. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results and Discussion

Mice receiving chronic treatment with morphine (10 mg/kg, twice daily) showed maximal antinociceptive effect on days 1 and 3 of treatment. However, the animals showed rapid development of tolerance as the tail-flick latency time reached near the baseline latency by day 10. Mice treated with ascorbic acid (800 or 1600 mg/kg) followed by morphine (10 mg/kg) for 9 d showed considerable antinociception on day 1, 3 and 9 of testing. Challenging each group with saline followed by morphine on day 10 evoked considerable antinociceptive response. The effect was, however, not significant with low dose of AA (400 mg/kg) (fig.1).

Mice receiving MK 801 (0.01 mg/kg) followed by morphine (10 mg/kg) on days 1-9 displayed maximal antinociceptive effect on day 1 and 3 of treatment.However, the reaction time reached the baseline latency by day 9 of testing showing development of tolerance. On day 10, the tail-flick latency was no greater than that of control group receiving saline followed by morphine from day 1 to 10. However, mice pretreated with MK 801 (0.01 mg/kg) in combination with ascorbic acid (800 mg/kg) followed by morphine (10 mg/kg) on days 1-9 displayed significant antinociception throughout the testing period (fig. 2).

Mice receiving haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) followed by morphine (10 mg/kg) on day 1-9 exhibited maximum antinociception on days 1 and 3. However, animals showed development of tolerance as the reaction time reached the basal latency by day 9 of testing. On day 10, when the mice were challenged with saline followed by morphine (10 mg/kg), exhibited tail- flick latency almost similar to that of control group receiving saline followed by morphine from day 1 to 10. However, animals receiving a combination of haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) and ascorbic acid (800 mg/kg) on days 1-9 showed significant antinociception throughout testing period. Challenging the same group with saline followed by morphine on day 10 also evoked significant antinociceptive response (fig. 3).

Animals treated with ascorbic acid (800 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) or MK 801 (0.01 mg/kg) alone or in combination followed by saline failed to exhibit any significant antinociceptive response on days 1, 3 and 9. Challenging these groups with their respective treatments followed by morphine (10 mg/kg) on day 10 produced significant antinociception; a response similar to morphine effect on day 1 (fig. 4).

Mice receiving repeated treatment with saline followed by morphine (10 mg/kg) displayed numerous escape jumps in response to injection of naloxone (2 mg/kg) on day 10. Mice treated with ascorbic acid (400- 1600 mg/kg) followed by morphine on day 1 to 9 dose-dependently inhibited the incidence of escape jumps. The effect, however, was not significant with ascorbic acid 400 mg/kg. Mice receiving MK 801 (0.01 mg/kg) followed by morphine (10 mg/kg) on day 1-9 failed to reduce naloxone-precipitated jumps significantly. However chronic treatment with haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) alone and in combination with ascorbic acid (800 mg/kg) followed by morphine (10 mg/kg) from day 1-9 significantly decreased the naloxone-precipitated jumps. Similarly, mice receiving MK-801 (0.01 mg/kg) in combination with ascorbic acid (800 mg/kg) followed by morphine on day 1-9 significantly decreased the number of naloxone-precipitated jumps (fig. 5).

The development of physical dependence and tolerance with repeated use is a characteristic feature of all the opioid drugs and offer major limitation in their clinical use. Tolerance and dependence are thought to result from neuronal adaptations produced by repeated drug exposure [14,15].

A series of reports have shown that non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK 801, blocks development of tolerance or dependence to several psychoactive substance including opiates [16,17]. The prevention of development of tolerance and dependence to opiates in our study appears to be due to different components of action of AA. The inability of low dose of ascorbic acid (400 mg/kg) given chronically to alter tolerance or dependence is consistent with observation that, ascorbic acid at low doses, has potentiating action on dopaminergic and glutamatergic system [9,18]. Ascorbic acid at high doses (800-1600 mg/kg), however, has profound inhibitory role over NMDA receptor function and a haloperidol-like antidopaminergic activity [7,19]. These activities might be acting simultaneously with the resultant inhibition of development of tolerance and dependence to morphine.

Dopamine antagonists like haloperidol and butaclamol inhibit wet-dog shakes and aggressive behavior observed during withdrawal [20-22]. Our findings showing inability of haloperidol to block development of tolerance may in part be due to low dose of haloperidol. However, ascorbic acid potentiated its antidopamineric action, as it does in stereotypy or catatonia19. Ascorbic acid inhibited the binding of both dopamine agonists and antagonists in dose dependent manner [23-25]. Furthermore, ascorbic acid also potentiated antidopaminergic activity of haloperidol [9,19]. Similarly, ascorbic acid significantly potentiated the activity of MK 801 that has no effect either on development of tolerance or dependence to opioids at low dose (0.01 mg/kg). Thus summing up the results, it appears that inhibition of development of tolerance and dependence by ascorbic acid has bi-directional component (or differential regulation). Since, even very high doses of ascorbic acid are known to be virtually non-toxic, it may be used therapeutically to treat morphine abstinence syndrome.

It is hypothesized that inhibition of development of tolerance and dependence to morphine by ascorbic acid appears to have two components, namely dopaminergic and glutamategic, and ascorbic acid prevents the development of tolerance and dependence to morphine in mice.

References

1. Bhargava HN. Diversity of agents that modify opioid tolerance, physical dependence, abstinence syndrome and self-administrative behavior. Pharmacol Rev l994;46:293-324.
2. Marek P, Ben-Eliyahu S, Gold M, Liebeskind JC. Excitatory amino acid antagonists (kynurenic acid and MK-80l) attenuate the development of morphine tolerance in the rat. Brain Res l99l;547:77-8l.
3. Rasmussen K, Fuller RW, Stockton ME, Perry KW, Swinford RM, Ornstein PL. NMDA receptor antagonists suppress behaviors but not norepinephrine turnover or locus coeruleus unit activity induced by opiate withdrawal. Eur J Pharmacol l99l;l97:9-l6.
4. Bhargava HN, Reddy PL, Gudehithlu KP. Down regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors of brain region and spinal cord of rats treated chronically with morphine. Gen Pharmacol l994;26:l3l-6.
5. Gudehithlu KP, Reddy PL, Bhargava HN. Effect of chronic morphine treatment on the binding of [3H] MK-80l to rat brain and spinal cord membranes. Pharmacologist l993;35:Al90.
6. Gudehithlu KP, Reddy PL, Bhargava HN. Effect of morphine tolerance and abstinence on the binding of [3H] MK-80l to brain regions and spinal cord of the rat. Brain Res l994;639:269-74.
7. Majewska MD, Bell JA. Ascorbic acid protects neurons from injury induced by glutamate and NMDA. Neuroreport l990;l:l94-6.
8. Lazzarini M, Salum C, Del Bel EA. Combined treatment of ascorbic acid or alpha-tocopherol with dopamine receptor antagonist or nitric oxide synthase inhibitor potentiates cataleptic effect in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2005;l8l:7l-9.
9. Deshpande C, Dhir A, Kulkarni SK. Antagonistic activity of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) on dopaminergic modulation: Apomorphine-induced stereotypic behavior in mice. Pharmacology 2006;77:38-45.
10. Tolbert BM, Ward JB. Dehydroascorbic acid. Adv Chem Ser l982;200:l0l-23.
11. D’Armour FE, Smith DL. A method for determining the loss of pain sensation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther l94l;72:74-9.
12. Kulkarni SK. Heat and other physiological stress-induced analgesia: Catecholamine mediated and naloxone reversible response. Life Sci l980;27:l85-8.
13. Kulkarni SK, Verma A. Protective effect of BR-l6A (Mentat), a herbal preparation on alcohol abstinence-induced anxiety and convulsions. Indian J Exp Biol l993;3l:435-9.
14. Aghajanian GK. Tolerance of locus coeruleus neurons to morphine and suppression of withdrawal response by clonidine. Nature l978;276:l86-8.
15. Clouet DH, Iwatsubo K. Dopamine-sensitive adenylate cyclase of the caudate nucleus of rats treated with morphine. Life Sci l975;l7:35-40.
16. Karler R, Calder LD, Chaudhry IA. Turkanis SA. Blockade of “reverse tolerance” to cocaine and amphetamine by MK-80l. Life Sci l989;45:599-606.
17. Trujillo KA, Akil H. Inhibition of morphine tolerance and dependence by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-80l. Science l99l;25l:85-7.
18. O’Neill RD, Fillenz M, Sundstrom L, Rawlins JN. Voltammetrically monitored brain ascorbate as an index of excitatory amino acid release in the unrestrained rat. Neurosci Lett l984;52:227-33.
19. Rebec GV, Centore JM, White LK, Alloway KD. Ascorbic acid and the behavioral response to haloperidol: Implications for the action of antipsychotic drugs. Science l985;227:438-40.
20. Lal H, Numan R. Blockade of morphine-withdrawal body shakes by haloperidol. Life Sci l976;l8:l63-7.
21. Puri S, Lal H. Effect of dopaminergic stimulation or blockade on morphine-withdrawal  aggression.  Psychopharmacologia  l973;32:ll3-20.
22. Hynes MD, McCarten MD, Shearman G, Lal H. Differential reduction of morphine-withdrawal body shakes by butaclamol enantiomers. Life Sci l978;22:l33-6.
23. Heikkila RE, Manzino L, Cabbat FS, Hanly JG. Ascorbic acid and the binding of DA agonists to neostriatal membrane preparations. Neuropharmacology   l983;22:l35-7.
24. Hadjiconstantinou M, Neff NH. Ascorbic acid could be hazardous to your experiments: A commentary on dopamine receptor binding studies with speculation on a role for ascorbic acid in neuronal function. Neuropharmacology  l983;22:939-43.
25. Tolbert LC, Morris PE Jr, Spollen JJ, Ashe SC. Stereospecific effects of ascorbic acid and analogues on Dl and D2 agonist binding. Life Sci l992;5l:92l-30.