*Corresponding Author:
Preeti M. Gandhi
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, JSPM’s Jayawantrao Sawant College of Pharmacy and Research, Hadapsar, Pune-411 028, India
E-mail: preetigandhi2007@gmail.com
Date of Submission 20 December 2017
Date of Revision 02 June 2018
Date of Acceptance 05 March 2019
Indian J Pharm Sci 2019;81(3):406-414  

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms

Abstract

The prodrug approach using various carriers has evolved as a significant tool in surmounting different obstacles in relation to drug formulation and targeting. Properties and selection of carriers or promoeities is a very important parameter in successful prodrug design. Carrier would change a drug’s physical attributes in order to increase its fat or water solubility or to allow site-directed delivery. Though several studies have been carried out on various prodrugs, surprisingly very few reviews on different carriers, which can be used for prodrug synthesis were published to date. In this review different types of carriers, which can be used for prodrug synthesis are summarized. Examples of both marketed and investigational prodrugs using several promoieties are discussed with their advantages and future prospects. The present review is expected to be useful for scientists working in the field of drug discovery and development.

Keywords

Prodrug, carriers, promoiety, polymer, amino acid, prodrug design

Prodrugs are derivatives of drug molecules that are pharmacologically inactive but require either chemical or enzymatic transformation to release the active drug in vivo in order to exert a pharmacological effect. Prodrugs have better delivery properties that surpass the parent drug molecule [1]. Prodrug concept is justified because it enables the active drug to overcome the barrier that would impede it from reaching the site of action to exert the required pharmacological activity. Some of the barriers that the prodrug approach helps to surmount are as follows, low bioavailability due to poor aqueous solubility (corticosteroids); poor permeability or absorption (ampicillin); high first pass metabolism (propranolol); metabolic instability leading to short half-life, (dopamine); poor site specificity (anticancer agents); incomplete absorption (epinephrine); unfavourable organoleptic properties (chloramphenicol); difficulties during formulation and adverse effects and toxicity [2-4].

The prodrug approach is rapidly becoming a crucial part in the stratagem of delivery of drugs. The prodrug strategy implementation in the last 20 y has led to a steady advancement in the biopharmaceutical, physicochemical and/or pharmacokinetic attributes of the pharmacologically active compounds. The success of the prodrug approach can be measured by examining how many prodrugs are currently on the market. Around 10 % of marketed medicines can be categorized as prodrugs currently, and also that during 2008, 33 % of approved small molecular weight drugs were prodrugs [5-7]. The objective of this review is to provide the researchers with a compilation of which carriers would be suitable for prodrug synthesis and what would be their benefits.

Classification of prodrugs:

According to Wermuth prodrugs can be divided into two main categories, bioprecusors and carrierlinked prodrugs [8]. Bioprecursors do not have a promoiety or carrier but yield the active compound upon biotransformation. A bioprecursor prodrug is transformed chemically through hydration (for example, lactones such as some statins), reduction (for example, sulindac, platinum (IV) complexes) or oxidation (for example, dexpanthenol, nabumetone) or metabolically to the active agent [5,9-11].

Carrier-linked prodrugs are for drugs with major drawbacks, which are linked to a nontoxic carrier or promoiety through covalent linkage to change or get rid of their undesirable physicochemical properties. These prodrugs subsequently undergo enzymatic or non-enzymatic cleavage to release the active drug moiety (figure 1) [12,13]. The main groups of carrierlinked prodrugs are amides and esters. Other groups include carbamates, phosphates, oximes, carbonates, N-Mannich and imines bases.

ijpsonline-carrier-linked

Figure 1: Schematic representation of carrier-linked prodrug
A drug (image ) is linked with carrier (image ) through covalent linkage (image ) during chemical prodrug formation (A). Prodrug subsequently undergoes chemical or enzymatic cleavage in vivo (B) to release active drug and inert carrier

Based on the essential characteristics of the carrier that is used, the carrier-linked prodrug can be classified further into, double prodrugs and mutual prodrugs. Double prodrug is derivatized further in a manner that only enzymatic conversion to prodrug is possible before the latter is able to cleave and release the active drug. A number of benzodiazepines are insoluble in water and therefore prodrugs which are water soluble are required for injections. Double prodrugs of benzodiazepines are prepared in which rate of cyclisation is influenced by the nature of amino acid carrier group (figure 2) [14]. Macromolecules such as proteins, polymers, peptides, dextrans, polysaccharides, and cyclodextrins (CDs) can be employed as carriers in order to form macromolecular prodrugs. Site-specific prodrugs, where a carrier transports an active drug to a given targeted site.

ijpsonline-benzodiazepines

Figure 2: Double prodrug of benzodiazepines
Double prodrug (A) of benzodiazepines gets converted to prodrug (B) after cleavage of amide bond by enzyme aminopeptidase. Prodrug (B) further undergoes cyclisation and gets converted to active drug (C). Rate of cyclisation is influenced by nature of amino acid carrier group and also the nature of R’, R’’ and R’’’

Mutual prodrugs are those in which, another active drug is utilized as a carrier rather than some inert molecules. It comprises of coupling two pharmacologically active agents in such a way that each active agent behaves as a promoiety for the other active agent and vice versa.

The mutual prodrug carrier selected would have additional biological action that might be absent in the parent drug or both carrier and the parent drug might have the same biological action, which ensures synergistic action or some additional benefit (e.g. sultamicilin, a mutual prodrug of ampicillin and sulbactam) [15]. The carrier can also serve as a drug that helps to target the parent drug to a given site or cells or organ or can improve a drug’s site specificity (e.g. sulfasalazine, mutual prodrug of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and sulfapyridine) [16]. It can also be utilized to subdue the parent drug’s side effects too (e.g. benorilate, mutual prodrug of paracetamol and aspirin) [17].

The benefits of carrier-linked prodrugs [18,19] include, an increase in absorption; pain relief on the injection site; reduction of GI irritation; masking of unpleasant taste; lowering toxicity; reduction of metabolic inactivation; increasing chemical stability and prolongation or shortening of the duration of action.

Criteria for carrier-linked prodrugs:

Certain criteria need to be satisfied for a carrier-linked prodrug to be a well-designed [19]. A covalent bond binds the carrier to the drug. The prodrug needs to be inactive or rather less active compared to the parent drug. The link ought to be bioreversible. To make sure that the site of action has effective drug levels, the active form generation must occur with rapid kinetics. The carrier and prodrug released after nonenzymatic or enzymatic hydrolysis must be nontoxic. A carrier-linked prodrug bioavailability is modulated through the use of a transient moiety. In case of carrier prodrugs, lipophilicity is a subject of extensive changes of the parent molecule. The bioactivation process is exclusively hydrolytic, although at times, it is a redox system.

Carriers or promoieties:

The carrier or promoiety changes the drug’s physical attributes to increase fat or water solubility or provide site-directed delivery. The choice of which carrier to use is dependent on the prodrug’s purpose, the parent drug’s available functional groups, the prodrug’s enzymatic and chemical conversion mechanisms to parent drug, the carrier’s safety, and the ease of manufacturing [20]. Correct choice of a carrier is the most important part of prodrug design. It should be carried out with respect to the state of the disease, the dosage, and the therapy duration. As single parent drug can be derivatized to several prodrugs, this change is due only to the change in nature of promoiety. This difference in the promoiety varies the cleavage of drug and promoiety bond [21].

Criteria for carriers:

In an ideal situation, the carrier should not have intrinsic toxicity. The carrier should also be nonantigenic and non-immunogenic, and should not accumulate in the body. Instead, the carrier should have satisfactory functional groups for adequate loading capacity and drug attachment. It should also be relatively easy to produce at a low cost. A carrier must remain stable under prodrug administration conditions, chemical manipulation and autoclaving. It should undergo biodegradation to inactive metabolites. Its characterization should be easy, and it needs to mask the liganded drug’s activity until the active agent released at the desired action site. The carrier is expected to have some biological activity of its own in relation to a mutual prodrug approach [5,7,11,22].

Lipids as prodrug carriers:

Lipidic prodrugs, also known as drug-lipid conjugates, have the lipid moiety covalently bound to a drug. Drug-lipid conjugates are prepared so as to exploit the advantage of the metabolic pathway of the lipid biochemistry, and thus allow for targeting of organs or overcome delivery problems. Pharmacological half-life and pharmacokinetics of the drug can be improved by using lipid carriers, thus allowing for reduced dosing frequency. Lipids have other advantages such as an increase in absorption through intestines in regards to oral drug absorption and to the central nervous system for brain delivery. In addition, drug targeting may be enhanced using the lipid delivery systems. To target the liver, lipids are bound with endogenous proteins in the blood, which carries the lipids to the organ [23,24]. Various natural lipid carriers are commonly used in the design of lipid prodrugs, including glycerides, fatty acids, and phospholipids. In designing the fatty acid-linked conjugates, the drugs are linked either to the ω-position at the end of the carbon chain or to the free carboxylate group (figure 3a). In case of conjugation to a carboxylate group, a drug containing an amino group or alcohol is linked to the fatty acid, which results in an ester or amide-linked conjugate, respectively. These conjugation strategies generally involve the use of an activating agent, such as N,N′- carbonyldiimidazole or carbodiimide, to convert the poor –OH leaving group to a better one, followed by the addition of an amine- or alcohol-containing drug [25,26]. This approach is the most common method of linking fatty acids and has been utilized for many parent drugs including non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, ketorolac) [27], angiotensinconverting- enzyme inhibitors (enalapril)[ 28], nucleosides (zidovudine) [29] and testosterone [30]. Conjugation to the ω-position is preferable in cases where increased albumin binding and cell membrane transporter properties are preferred. For this method, an ω-modified fatty acid, such as amino [31] or thiol [32] analogue, is utilized to link to the parent drug.

ijpsonline-phospholipids

Figure 3: Types of lipidic carriers: fatty acids, glycerides and phospholipids.
(a) Drug attached to fatty acid (X=O, NH); (b) drug attached to glyceride; (c) drug attached to phospholipid

Similar to fatty acids, glyceride prodrugs also take advantage of natural biosynthetic pathways. Glyceride conjugates are linked to orally administered drugs in order to reduce gastric damage of certain drugs (NSAIDs including aspirin [33], indomethacin [34], ibuprofen [35]) by preventing their release in the stomach, to reduce enzymatic degradation in the intestines, to target the lymphatic route, or to enhance their delivery through the blood-brain barrier [36]. In this approach, drugs containing a carboxylate group are linked to the glyceride via an ester bond (figure 3b).

The conjugation chemistry is also similar to fatty acid conjugation, involving the use of an activating agent or acid halide (chloride) derivative. In phospholipidlinked prodrugs, the drugs are either attached to the glycerol backbone or to the phosphate group (figure 3c). Drugs that are linked to the phosphate group are generally antiviral nucleoside analogues. These prodrugs take advantage of drug release inside the cell in a monophosphate form, bypassing possible deficiencies in nucleoside kinase activity. Drugs attached to the glycerol backbone utilize the natural absorption pathway for phospholipids to cross the intestinal lumen or blood-brain barrier [23].

Amino acids as prodrug carriers:

Amino acids do have proven record of being successfully used as promoieties in synthesis of prodrugs. In recent times, a hot field in regards to drug delivery research has concentrated on developing amino acid prodrugs for different active transporter targeted delivery goals [37]. Most of amino acid prodrugs are either esters or amides, in which amine or carboxylic group of amino acid is attached to hydroxyl, amine or carboxyl group of drug moiety. Amino acids are biocompatible and easily ionisable. The amino acid prodrugs improve oral delivery of drugs, which have poor permeability and solubility. When an amino acid is introduced, be it a derivative or natural, to a parent drug, it normally rises the solubility in water by multiplier magnitudes via an ammonium cation or an ionized carboxylate anion.

In addition, numerous transporters required for absorbing oligopeptides and amino acids are expressed in the epithelial cells of the intestinal brush-border membranes and have been discovered to play a substantial role in absorbing various amino acid prodrugs [38]. For instance, the enhanced oral bioavailability of valganciclovir and valacyclovir, amino acid ester prodrugs of ganciclovir and acyclovir, respectively, are ascribed to their enhanced intestinal transport through the H+-coupled peptide transporter 1 (PEPT1) [39,40]. In recent times, prodrugs of amino acid have ensured controlled drug release in the kind of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, which is a L-lysine amino acid amide prodrug of D-amphetamine [41].

Benefits of amino acids as promoieties [38,42] include, large structural diversity; they are normal dietary constituents and are nontoxic in moderate doses as compared to other promoieties; a broad range of functional groups like hydroxyl, amine, or carboxylic acid group, which can be attached to parent drug; wellestablished prodrug chemistry; commercial availability; fewer safety concerns; substrates for various different intestinal influx transporters; they have gastroprotective action; the availability of amino acid prodrugs those are commercially successful; utilized for the improvement of pharmaceutical attributes of difficult compounds or marketed drugs.

All α-amino acids contain a chiral α-carbon with the exception of glycine, and are available in two optical isomers, D- and L-form. The L-form exists naturally. As such, the prodrugs prepared by using these amino acids are normally activated by enzymes that occur naturally. The L- and D-amino acid prodrugs have similar physicochemical attributes; however, the latter is stable against hydrolysis due to enzymes that occur naturally. This amino acid characteristic is frequently used by medicinal chemists to create stable prodrugs of amino acid. Furthermore, the large arrays of di-/tripeptides and synthetic amino acids like D-amino acids, homo amino acids, beta-homo amino acids, N-methyl amino acids, α-methyl amino acids are commercially available as promoieties for medicinal chemists in addition to natural amino acids [43].

When amino acids are promoieties, they offer the largest expanse and structural diversity of physicochemical properties. By selection of the proper amino acid, polarity, solubility profile and acid base properties of a given drug molecule can be altered. Few examples of produgs that are reported using amino acids as promoieties and the advantage achieved thereof are given in Table 1 [44-49].

Amino acids used as carriers Conjugation with drug Advantage Reference
Valine Saquinavir, indinavir Improved pharmacological and pharmacokinetic profile 44
L-Valine Acyclovir, zidovudine Enhanced cellular uptake 45
L-alanine and histidine Aceclofenac Reduced gastrointestinal side effects 46
Glycine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, L-isoleucine, L-alanine, L-valine, L-aspartic acid L-glutamic acid Ketorolac Controlled release and reduced gastrointestinal side effects 42
L-tryptophan, histidine, DL-alanine Flurbiprofen Reduced gastrointestinal side effects 47
Phenylalanine, valine and prolineGlycine, alanine, lysine, Floxuridine Good solution stability and fast enzymatic conversion rates 48
leucine, phenylalanine Dapsone Improved water solubility 49

Table 1: Amino Acid Prodrugs

Polysaccharides as prodrug carriers:

Polysaccharides are used as promoieties specifically for colon targeting drug delivery. Various polysaccharides, such as cyclodextrin, dextran, pectin, chitosan and chondroitin are conjugated with drugs. Chondroitin sulphate, a copolymer of D-glucuronic acid and sulphated N acetyl D-galactosamine, is an important structural component in connective tissue and cartilage. It can be used as a good candidate for colon-targeted drug carriers. CDs belong to the family of oligosaccharides. They are obtained by enzymatic degradation of starch. CDs are nontoxic and thought to be one of the most suitable promoieties to reduce ulcerogenic tendency of drugs.

Dextran has excellent physicochemical properties, physiological response and unique pharmacokinetic profile. It contains large number of carbohydrate hydroxyl groups available, which can be linked to drug. Even though this limits the number of drugs that might be directly liganded to the matrix using application of spacer arm technique, which links drugs possessing diverse functional groups to dextran[50]. Literature revealed that in most polymeric prodrugs, the drug is connected to polymeric carrier by a chemical linkage. Dextran was investigated as a macromolecular carrier for delivering drugs and also demonstrated that it is useful to target therapeutic agents to the liver. The examples of polysaccharides as prodrug carriers with their advantages are given in Table 2 [51-55].

Polysaccharides used as carriers Conjugation with drug Advantage Reference
Cyclodextrin Mefenamic acid Reduced ulcerogenic potential 51
Dextran Flurbiprofen and suprofen Improved analgesic and antipyretic effect with low ulcerogenic potential 52
Chitosan glucosamine Metronidazole Colon-targeted drug delivery 53
Dextran Valproic acid Reduced hepatotoxicity and ulcerogenicity 54
Dextran Acyclovir Targeting of drug to liver 55

Table 2: Polysaccharide Prodrugs

Phytophenols as prodrug carriers:

Traditionally phytophenols are used for their medicinal as well as flavouring properties, with well-documented safety profiles. Phytophenols can be linked to drugs containing carboxylic group via an ester bond. These are used as prodrug carriers to combine antiinflammatory and antioxidant properties. Naturally occurring phenolic antioxidants are thymol, guaiacol and eugenol whereas menthol is alcoholic compound. Menthol, thymol, eugenol, guaiacol, vanillin, umbelliferone (Table 3) [56-58] are the promoieties used in prodrug synthesis. They show antioxidant as well as gastroprotective properties.

Phytophenols used ascarriers Conjugation with drug Advantage Reference
Guaiacol, eugenol, thymol,Vanillin, umbelliferone, menthol. Diclofenac Reduced ulcerogenic potential 56
Menthol, thymol, eugenol Ibuprofen Synergistic analgesic action and reduced gastrointestinal toxicity 57
Guaiacol Mefenamic acid Synergistic antiinflammatory activity and less toxicity 58

Table 3: Phytophenolic Prodrugs

Alcohols as prodrug carriers:

Esters dominate research due to their ideal characteristics that exhibit sufficient chemical stability in vitro and their ability to function as esterase substrates for in vivo regeneration[ 59]. Alcohols form ester bonds with carboxylic groups of drug moiety. N-propyl, iso-butyl, iso-propyl, t-butyl, benzyl, cyclopentyl and cyclohexyl alcohols (Table 4) [60,61] are alcohols used as promoieties in synthesis of ester prodrugs. Iodomethyl pivalate and 2-bromo ethyl acetate are also used.

Alcohols used as carriers Conjugation with drug Advantage Reference
Cyclopentyl alcohol, cyclohexanol, iso-butyl alcohol, t-butyl alcohol Flurbiprofen Decreased gastrointestinal side effects 60
Iodomethyl pivalate and 2- bromo ethyl acetate Indomethacin Reduced gastrointestinal side effects 61

Table 4: Ester Prodrugs

Amines as prodrug carriers:

For the synthesis of amide prodrugs various amines like propylamine, diethylamine, cyclohexyl amine, 2-amino ethyl amine, 2-hydroxyl ethyl amine, ethylenediamine, benzathine and cysteamine (Table 5) [62-64] are used as carriers. These form amide bonds with carboxylic groups of drug moiety.

Amines used as carriers Conjugation with drug Advantage Reference
Ethylenediamine and benzathine conjugate Ibuprofen Reduced gastrointestinal side effects and improved analgesic activity 62
Propylamine, diethylamine, cyclohexyl amine, 2–amino ethyl amine, 2–hydroxyl ethyl amine Ketoprofen Reduced gastrointestinal side effects and improved analgesic activity 63
Cysteamine Ibuprofen andIndomethacin Antioxidant activity and lower ulcerogenic potential 64
Heterocyclic amide Ibuprofen Improved analgesic activity, lower ulcerogenic potential 64

Table 5: Amide Prodrugs

Polymers as prodrug carriers:

Within the last 20 y, scientists concentrated on creating drug delivery systems that were site specific and various polymers showed promising outcomes. A drug and polymer conjugation forms the polymeric prodrug. In 1975, Ringsdorf for the first time formulated a rational model (figure 4) of a polymeric prodrug. Ringsdorf was first to recognize that if biologists and polymer chemists work together polymeric prodrugs with immense potential can be evolved [65]. The suggested model is made up of majorly five elements, the drug, the targeting group, the polymeric backbone, the solubilizing agent, and the spacer. The carrier is either biodegradable or an inert polymer. The spacer controls the site and the rate of active drug release from the conjugate [66]. The drug and the polymer must be covalently bonded together. The drug must stay linked to the polymer until the macromolecule reaches to the desired action site.

ijpsonline-prodrug

Figure 4: Ringsdorf’s model of polymeric prodrug
Five elements of Ringsdorf’s model: the drug (image ), the targeting moiety (image ), the polymeric backbone (image ), the solubilizing agent (image ) and the cleavable spacer ( image)

Three criteria are used as basis to select the drug to be used in this system, first, due to restriction on the quantity of drug that can be administered, only a potent drug should be used. Second, the drug should possess proper functional group so as to bind successfully to polymer backbone directly or through spacer molecule. Third, the drug has to be sufficiently stable. Until drug gets released at the desired site it must not be excreted in the conjugate form [67]. Polymer like polyethylene glycol (PEG) can be attached to the hydroxyl or amine group of the drug via spacers and linked to the spacer via an ester, amide, carbonate, or carbamate bond that undergoes either chemical or enzymatic cleavage in the bioconversion process.

Classification of polymers:

Below is a classification of some important polymers used for bioconjugation based on their origin, synthetic polymers- PEG, divinylethermaleic anhydride/acid copolymer, polyethylenimine or polyaziridine and vinyl polymers- a) N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide b) poly(styrene-co-maleic acid/anhydride). Natural polymers- dextran, chitosan, proteins. Pseudosynthetic polymers- synthetic poly(α-amino acids) like poly(Lglutamic acid), poly(L-lysine), poly(N-hydroxyalkyl) glutamines) and polyglycolic or polyglycolide acid. Proper drug and polymer candidate must be selected while designing the polymeric conjugates. Table 6 shows few examples of polymeric prodrugs available in the market.

Conjugate Indication
PEG-adenosine deaminase (Adagen) SCID Syndrome
PEG-asparaginase (Oncaspar) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Linear PEG Interferon α-2b (PEG-Intron) Hepatitis C, multiple sclerosis and HIV- AIDS.
PEG-growth hormone receptor antagonist Acromegaly
PEG-G-CSF (Pegfilgrastim, Neulasta) Prevention of neutropenia associated with cancer chemotherapy
Branched PEG-anti-VEGF aptamer Muscular degeneration (age related)
PEG-anti-TNF-Fab Crohn’s disease and Rheumatoid arthritis
SMANCS (Zinostatin stimalamer) Hepatocellular carcinoma

Table 6: Polymer-Drug Conjugates Available in Market [65]

Requirements for choosing polymers as drug carriers:

The availability of suitable functional groups such as -OH, -COOH, -NH2, or -SH to covalently bind with drugs, biocompatible, non-immunogenic and nontoxic, biodegradable, molecular weight low enough to limit renal excretion, availability, reproducible manufacture, ease of administration to patients, hydrophilic to ensure aqueous solubility, low polydispersity and final conjugates should have a satisfactory homogeneity [68]. Prodrugs are increasingly becoming an integral component of the drug discovery stratagem. The rising percentage of approved new drug entities which are in fact, prodrugs, is a clear indication of their importance. Proper selection of a carrier is the most important part of prodrug design and synthesis. Selection of promoeity in prodrug research should be done wisely as it will determine the regeneration of active drug in vivo and also the promoeity itself should be nontoxic and excreted soon. The authors hope that the current review provides enough impetus to research different carriers for synthesis of prodrugs to succeed in delivery despite the challenges currently posed by complex molecules that are under development.

References