Corresponding Author:
J. Reenu Indian Institute of Spices Research, Marikunnu P.O., Kozhikode-673 012, India E-mail:
Date of Submission 09 October 2013
Date of Revision 20 October 2014
Date of Acceptance 16 January 2015
Indian J Pharm Sci 2015;77(1):41-48  


Present study deals with antioxidant potential of sequential extracts of fresh and dried rhizomes of Curcuma caesia, using solvents viz., hexane, petroleum ether, benzene, chloroform, ethyl acetate, methanol and water, which was analyzed by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging assay, total antioxidant capacity, ferric reducing activity and thiobarbituric acid reactive species assay. Total phenol content was estimated by the Folin-Ciocalteau method. C. caesia showed significant antioxidant activity in chloroform, benzene and ethyl acetate extracts. The chloroform extract was highly effective as free radical scavengers, electron-donating agents and reducing molybdate ions except for reducing lipid peroxidation. The highest total phenol content was also exhibited by chloroform and benzene extracts. Antioxidant potential expressed by C. caesia in the sequential extracts could be effectively utilized for identification of the bioactive compounds for future phytopharmacological applications.


Curcuma caesia, antioxidants, reactive oxygen species, total phenols

Free radicals, which are molecules with unpaired electrons, play a key role in the development of various degenerative diseases, including aging, cancer, inflammation, diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders[1,2]. They are formed as intermediates of various biochemical reactions, but when generated in excess can result in oxidative damage to DNA, proteins and lipids[3]. Free radicals containing oxygen, known as reactive oxygen species (ROS), are the most biologically significant free radicals. ROS include the superoxide and hydroxyl radical, plus derivatives of oxygen that do not contain unpaired electrons, such as hydrogen peroxide, singlet oxygen, and hypochlorous acid.

A class of compounds known as antioxidants control the formation of free radicals, by blocking the process of oxidation via scavenging these free radicals. Antioxidants are compounds that inhibit or delay oxidation of other molecules by terminating the initiation or propagation of oxidizing chain reactions. Restriction on the use of synthetic antioxidants due to their carcinogenic nature[4,5] has led to a growing interest in recent years in natural antioxidants of plant origin with low cytotoxicity for application in food industry to combat food deterioration. Natural antioxidants present in foods have attracted interest because of their safety, in addition to their nutritional and therapeutic effects. It is recognized that besides a role in endogenous defence of plants, human consumption of dietary antioxidants affords protection against some pathological events[6].

In recent years, synthetic antioxidants used as preservatives in processed foods, such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) are reported to be detrimental to human health and the search for plant-derived substances has intensified[7-9]. Thus, attention is now increasingly paid to the development and utilization of more effective and nontoxic antioxidants, of natural origin. Studies have shown that crude extracts or isolated pure compounds from a great number of natural medicinal plants were more effective antioxidants in vitro than BHT or vitamin E[10-12]. Epidemiological studies have also shown that the consumption of plant foods rich in antioxidants is beneficial to health as it protects against oxidative damage by inhibiting free radicals and reactive oxygen species[1,13,14]. Hence, medicinal plants can be a potential source of natural antioxidants.

Curcuma caesia Roxb., a member of the family Zingiberaceae and commonly known as black turmeric, is a perennial, erect rhizomatous herb with bluish-black rhizome of high economical importance because of its medicinal values (fig.1). It is native to North-East and Central India. Rhizomes of the plant are aromatic with intense camphoraceous odour and are applied externally to sprains and bruises[15]. The rhizomes are reported to contain antiinflammatory agents, and the paste of fresh rhizomes is used as a remedy for insect and snake bite by the Khamti tribe of Lohit district of eastern Arunachal Pradesh[16].

Much work has been conducted on the antioxidant activities of crude extracts of Curcuma caesia. Krishnaraj et al.[17] reported the antioxidant activity of C. caesia rhizome extract and found that it was significantly higher than C. amada rhizome extract. A study by Mangla et al.[18] showed that the methanol extract of C. caesia rhizomes had a moderate antioxidant activity as compared to the synthetic antioxidant, BHT. Both the enzymatic and crude extracts of the rhizomes and leaves of C. caesia have been analyzed by Dhal et al.[19] for their antioxidant activity in terms of DPPH and hydroxyl radical scavenging activity and revealed that the crude extracts (non enzymatic) are a better scavenger of free radical in comparison to enzymatic extracts in Curcuma species. Chirangini et al.[20] evaluated the antioxidant properties of crude methanol extracts of the rhizomes of eleven species of Zingiberales, including C. caesia using sulfur free radical reactivity with curcumin as the reference indicator and C. caesia possessed a good degree of antioxidant property. Sarangthem and Haokip[21] also compared the antioxidant activity of ethanol extract of C. caesia and C. longa. Indrajit et al.[22]. studied the antioxidant activity of methanol extract of C. caesia on reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and it showed significant activity in a dose dependent manner. Oleoresins extracted using dichloromethane from rhizomes of nine starchy Curcuma species exhibited good antioxidant activity and C. caesia is one among them[23]. These studies were based on single solvent extraction either in fresh or dried rhizomes.



Figure 1:Fresh mature rhizomes of Curcuma caesia Roxb.

However, to ensure the complete extraction of wide polarity range of compounds, serial exhaustive extraction involving sequential extraction with solvents of increasing polarity is employed[24]. Most researchers use the Soxhlet apparatus for efficient extraction, but this is not suitable for extraction of thermo labile compounds as prolonged heating will lead to the degradation of these compounds[25]. Therefore, the present study was designed to evaluate the in vitro antioxidant activity of sequential extracts of fresh and dried rhizomes of C. caesia, macerated in solvents ranging from the least to maximum polarity, sequentially.

Materials and Methods

Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), thiobarbituric acid (TBA) and 2,2’-azobis- (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (ABAP) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. All the other reagents and solvents were of analytical reagent grade and procured from Sisco Research Laboratories. Curcuma caesia rhizomes were obtained from the experimental farm of the Indian Institute of Spices Research at Peruvannamuzhi, Calicut. A portion of fresh rhizomes were washed, air dried and stored in freezer until the extraction, while the remaining rhizomes were cut into small pieces and sun dried for 48 h. Both fresh and dried rhizomes were subjected to extraction.

Preparation of plant extracts

The fresh and dried forms of rhizomes of C. caesia (each 50 g) were sequentially extracted with 500 ml each of the following solvents, in the order: hexane, petroleum ether, benzene, chloroform, ethyl acetate, methanol and water. Each time before extracting with the next solvent, the rhizome material was dried at room temperature. The extracts were filtered with Whatmann filter paper no.1 and evaporated to dryness using a rotary flash evaporator. Yield of the extract was recorded and extracts were stored at 4°, until analysis. The extracts were dissolved in methanol at a concentration of 0.01 g/ml prior to antioxidant assays. The antioxidant assays were also carried out on the synthetic antioxidants, BHA and BHT, at a concentration of 0.01% as a check.

DPPH radical scavenging assay

The antioxidant activity of extracts was determined on the basis of the scavenging activity of the stable DPPH free radical by the method described by Braca et al.[26]. Aliquots of 50 μl of sample were made up to 5 ml with methanol and mixed with 1 ml of 0.004% DPPH in methanol and incubated in dark at room temperature for 30 min. A control was maintained with DPPH in methanol. The absorbance was measured at 517 nm against a blank in a Shimadzu UV-160A Spectrophotometer. The ability to scavenge the DPPH radical was calculated using the Eqn., scavenging activity (%)=(1-As/Ac)×100, where, As is the absorbance of sample; Ac is the absorbance of control. BHA and BHT were used as positive controls. Each extract was tested in triplicates and mean values calculated.

Total antioxidant capacity by phosphomolybdenum method

The total antioxidant capacity was measured by spectrophotometric method of Prieto et al.[27]. An aliquot of 10 μl was made to 3 ml with methanol and mixed with 1 ml of reagent solution (0.6 M sulfuric acid, 28 mM sodium phosphate, and 4 mM ammonium molybdate). Blank consisted of 3 ml of methanol and 1 ml of reagent solution. The tubes were capped and incubated for 90 min at 95°. After the tubes had cooled to room temperature, absorbance was measured at 695 nm in a Shimadzu UV-160A Spectrophotometer. Total antioxidant activity was expressed as AAE (mmol ascorbic acid equivalent/g extract). BHA and BHT were used as positive controls. Each extract was tested in triplicates and mean values calculated.

Fe(III) to Fe(II) reducing activity

The reducing power of the extracts was determined by the method of Oyaizu[28]. Aliquots of 20 μl of sample were made up to 1 ml with water and mixed with 2.5 ml of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) and 2.5 ml of 1% aqueous potassium hexacyanoferrate, K3Fe(CN)6 solution. After 30 min incubation at 50°, 2.5 ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid was added, and the mixture was centrifuged for 10 min. A 2.5 ml aliquot of the upper layer was mixed with 2.5 ml of water and 0.5 ml of 0.1% aqueous FeCl3, and the absorbance recorded at 700 nm in a Shimadzu UV- 160A Spectrophotometer. Ferric reducing activity was expressed as AAE (mmol ascorbic acid equivalent/g extract). BHA and BHT were used as positive controls. Each extract was tested in triplicates and mean values calculated.

Thiobarbituric acid reactive species assay

A modified TBARS assay, using egg yolk homogenate as lipid rich media, was used to measure the antioxidant ability of the samples. Yolk homogenate was prepared as described by Dorman et al.[29], where an aliquot of yolk was used at a concentration of 10% w/v in KCl (1.15% w/v). The yolk was then homogenized for 30 s, followed by ultrasonication for a further 5 min. For TBARS assay, 500 μl of 10% w/v yolk homogenate and 50 μl of sample solubilised in methanol, were added to a test tube and made up to 1 ml with distilled water, followed by the addition of 50 μl of 2,2’-azobis-(2- amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (ABAP, 0.07 M) to induce lipid peroxidation. Further, 1.5 ml of 20% acetic acid (pH 3.5) and 1.5 ml of 0.8% (w/v) TBA in 1.1% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) were added. The tubes were stirred in a vortex, and heated to 95° for 60 min. After cooling to room temperature, 5 ml butan-1-ol was added to each tube, stirred and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 532 nm in a Shimadzu UV-160A Spectrophotometer. All the values were expressed as antioxidant index (AI %). The AI % was calculated using, AI %=(1-As/Ac)×100, where Ac being the absorbance of the control and As, the absorbance of the test sample. BHA and BHT were used as positive controls. Each extract was tested in triplicates and mean values calculated.

Total phenol content

Total phenol content was estimated according to the Folin-Ciocalteau method[30]. To the sample (20 μl), was added 250 μl of undiluted Folin-Ciocalteau reagent. After 1 min, 750 μl of 20% w/v aqueous sodium carbonate was added, and the volume made up to 5 ml with water. After 1 min of incubation at 100°, the absorbance was measured at 760 nm against a blank in a Shimadzu UV-160A Spectrophotometer. The results were expressed as GAE (mg gallic acid equivalent/g extract). Each extract was tested in triplicates and mean values calculated.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD) and subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Duncan’s multiple range test (P≤0.05) was used to bring out the significant difference among fresh and dried rhizomes of C. caesia using SAS 9.3. In addition, student’s t-test (P≤0.05) was performed to compare the significant difference between fresh and dried rhizomes.

Results and Discussion

In the present work, in vitro antioxidant potential of sequential extracts of fresh and dried rhizomes of C. caesia with solvents of differing polarity was analyzed using protocols viz. DPPH radical scavenging assay, total antioxidant capacity, ferric reducing activity and TBARS assay. The results were compared using synthetic antioxidants viz. BHA and BHT, at a concentration of 0.01%, the concentration at which these are normally used for foods. Total phenol content was also ascertained in the extracts.

Table 1 gives the percentage yield during the sequential extraction of the rhizomes of C. caesia (fresh and dried). The rhizomes were sequentially extracted with different solvents of increasing polarity. Extracts obtained were viscous in nature and brown to brownish yellow in color. In the case of fresh rhizomes, yield ranged from 1 to 40 mg/g, maximum yield being shown in the water extract. In dried rhizomes, hexane, methanol and water showed higher yield. The purpose of employing sequential extraction with the same powder was to ensure the complete extraction of wide polarity range of compounds. Each extract was analyzed for antioxidant property.

DPPH radical scavenging activities of the extracts from fresh and dried rhizomes of C. caesia are presented in Table 2. In fresh rhizomes, both chloroform and methanol extracts showed higher levels of scavenging activity, with 67.76 and 67.36%, while lowest activity was expressed in hexane extract (23.43%). In dried rhizomes, scavenging activity was high starting from the non polar solvent benzene (85.79%) to more polar solvents, viz. chloroform (92.98%), ethyl acetate (91.48%) and methanol (73.07%), maximum activity being expressed in chloroform extract. In both cases, hexane, petroleum ether and water extracts showed lesser scavenging activity ranging from 23.43 to 36.18%.

The phosphomolybdenum method is based on the reduction of molybdenum(VI) to molybdenum(V) by the antioxidants and the subsequent formation of a green phosphate/Mo(V) complex at acidic pH[27]. Table 3 illustrates the total antioxidant activities of successive extracts of C. caesia rhizomes as compared with the standard antioxidants, BHA and BHT. Chloroform extract showed the highest total antioxidant activity in both fresh and dried rhizomes, i.e. 2457.33 and 4534.33 mmol AAE/g extract, respectively, as compared to the other extracts. A higher level of antioxidant activity was shown in benzene and hexane extracts in fresh rhizomes (2327.67 and 2311.33 AAE ascorbic acid/g extract, respectively), while benzene and ethyl acetate extracts also expressed higher antioxidant property in dried rhizomes (4338.67 and 4024.67 mmol AAE/g extract, respectively). Interestingly, aqueous extracts of fresh and dried rhizomes had minimal reducing capacity.

Extracts   Yield (mg/g)
  Fresh Dry
Hexane 6.66 17.50
Petroleum ether 1.18 1.50
Benzene 3.16 6.58
Chloroform 4.34 9.46
Ethyl acetate 2.96 6.64
Methanol 8.70 25.82
Water 40.00 80.00

Table 1: yield of sequential extraction of c. Caesia rhizomes with different solvents.

Extracts Fresh Dry
Hexane 23.43±0.20f,Y 33.53±0.40e,X
Petroleum ether 36.18±0.10d,X 29.76±0.56f,Y
Benzene 62.67±0.81b,Y 85.79±1.18c,X
Chloroform 67.76±1.25a,Y 92.98±0.54a,X
Ethyl acetate 50.86±0.43c,Y 91.48±0.42b,X
Methanol 67.36±0.76a,Y 73.07±0.05d,X
Water 26.71±0.18e,X 24.19±0.18g,Y
Synthetic antioxidants    
BHA 40.14±0.36  
BHT 20.07±0.36  

Table 2: scavenging activity (%) of sequential extracts of c. Caesia rhizomes using dpph radical.

Extracts Fresh Dry
  (mmol AAE/g extract) (mmol AAE/g extract)
Hexane 2311.33±70.24b,X 2000.33±45.52e,Y
Petroleum ether 1140.00±43.28d,Y 2448.67±28.75d,X
Benzene 2327.67±74.20b,Y 4338.67±23.18b,X
Chloroform 2457.33±18.50a,Y 4534.33±93.88a,X
Ethyl acetate 1346.00±33.87c,Y 4024.67±81.99c,X
Methanol 1198.67±79.66d,Y 1542.67±5.51f,X
Water 27.15±0.05e,Y 69.54±0.07g,X
Synthetic antioxidants (mmol AAE/g sample)  

Table 3: total antioxidant capacity of sequential extracts of c. Caesia rhizomes.

Ferric reducing assay is simple and effective for analyzing the antioxidants. Substances which have reduction potential react with potassium ferricyanide (Fe3+) to form potassium ferrocyanides (Fe2+), which then react with ferric chloride to form ferric-ferrous complex that has an absorption maxima at 700 nm[28]. Ferric reducing activity is expressed as mmol AAE/g extract (Table 4). The values ranged from 1084.33 to 1428.00 mmol AAE/g extract. However, among the extracts, solvents with lowest and highest polarity (hexane and water) could exhibit lower ferric reducing power in fresh rhizomes.

In this modified TBARS assay, egg yolk homogenate was used as lipid rich media. At the end of the incubation, the concentration of thiobarbituric acidreactive substances (TBARS) was measured as the index of lipid peroxidation. Table 5 gives the level of lipid peroxidation in terms of TBARS produced in the rhizome extracts. Evidently, all the successive extracts with ascending polarity gave TBARS activity with narrow difference, ranging from 35.73 to 60.51 AI % in both fresh and dried rhizomes.

Table 6 gives the total phenol content of fresh and dried rhizomes in the various extracts of C. caesia. Chloroform could extract the maximum levels of total phenols recording highest concentration of 57.53 mg GAE/g extract in fresh and 109.41 mg GAE/g extract in dried rhizomes. Benzene extracts was also found to have higher content of phenols with 56.64 mg GAE/g extract in fresh and 96.68 mg GAE/g extract in dried rhizomes. The lowest phenol content of 32.58 and 28.33 mg GAE/g extract was found in the methanol extract of fresh and dried rhizomes, respectively.

Extracts Fresh Dry
  (mmol AAE/g extract) (mmol AAE/g extract)
Hexane 1093.67±6.11d,Y 1212.33±48.18d,X
Petroleum ether 1147.33±3.21c,Y 1168.67±0.58e,X
Benzene 1206.67±2.08b,Y 1391.67±3.06b,X
Chloroform 1239.00±4.00a,Y 1428.00±5.00a,X
Ethyl acetate 1234.00±2.65a,Y 1368.00±6.56b,X
Methanol 1212.67±6.81b,Y 1253.67±5.03c,X
Water 1084.33±0.58e,Y 1174.74±1.10e,X
Synthetic antioxidants (mmol AAE/g sample)  
BHA 956.00±0.50  
BHT 843.10±2.87  

Table 4: Ferric reducing activity of sequential extracts of c. Caesia rhizomes.

Extracts Fresh (AI %) Dry (AI %)
Hexane 57.99±0.40a,Y 58.87±0.16b,X
Petroleum ether 53.63±0.30c,X 46.62±0.52d,Y
Benzene 48.16±0.93d,Y 59.06±0.56ab,X
Chloroform 57.00±0.76a,X 42.88±0.79e,Y
Ethyl acetate 45.68±0.80e,Y 60.51±1.45a,X
Methanol 35.73±0.55f,Y 41.76±0.86e,X
Water 55.46±0.66b,X 56.46±0.52c,X
Synthetic antioxidants    
BHA 36.29±0.90  
BHT 48.19±0.79  

Table 5: antioxidant index (%) of sequential extracts of c. Caesia rhizomes using tbars Assay

Extracts Fresh (mg GAE/g extract) Dry (mg GAE/g extract)
Hexane 50.44±0.41c,Y 53.44±0.32d,X
Petroleum ether 38.42±0.50e,X 26.43±0.46g,Y
Benzene 56.64±0.32b,Y 96.68±0.26b,X
Chloroform 57.53±0.49a,Y 109.41±0.36a,X
Ethyl acetate 45.48±0.42d,Y 86.29±0.12c,X
Methanol 32.58±0.36g,X 28.33±0.26f,Y
Water 34.39±0.04f,Y 48.49±0.12e,X

Table 6:Total phenol content in sequential extracts of c. Caesia rhizomes.

Only a few spices have been relatively extensively studied in terms of possible health effects, which mainly include various Zingiberaceae species. Curcuma plants contain many bioactive compounds such as phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant enzymes. Evaluation of antioxidant potential in plants could result in the identification of natural antioxidants with pharmacological value. These natural antioxidants can be substituted to synthetic antioxidants in food additives[19]. Therefore, the present work was focused to analyze the antioxidant potential of the nonconventional species of Curcuma, C. Caesia Roxb.

DPPH is a stable free radical with purple color. The antioxidants scavenge DPPH radicals by either the process of hydrogen- or electron-donation leading to a non-radical with yellow color. Substances capable of performing this reaction are considered to be antioxidants and therefore radical scavengers[31]. It is very convenient to follow the DPPH reactions and it has often been used to estimate the antiradical activity of the natural products. Hydrogen-donating ability of the antioxidant molecule contributes to its free radical scavenging nature[32]. Free radical scavenging is the generally accepted mechanism for how antioxidants inhibit lipid oxidation. In our study, maximum scavenging activity was found in the chloroform extracts of both dried and fresh rhizomes. The results concluded that higher antioxidant activity is present in samples extracted with more polar solvents.

The phosphomolybdate method has been used routinely to evaluate the total antioxidant capacity of plant extracts. In the presence of extracts, Mo(VI) is reduced to Mo(V) and forms a green coloured phosphomolybdenum complex, which shows a maximum absorbance at 695 nm. Here we observe almost similar trend for the total antioxidant activity with that of the DPPH method, where the chloroform extracts possessed the maximum antioxidant potential. Regarding the ferric reducing power, all the solvents used for the sequential extraction could extract more or less the same content of antioxidants in terms of ascorbic acid. In contrast the weakest ability to reduce the ferric ion was exhibited by hexane extract.

Peroxidation is important in food deterioration and in the oxidative modification of biological molecules particularly lipids[33]. Inhibition of lipid peroxidation by any compound is often used to evaluate its antioxidant potential. TBARS is a preferable method in order to study the potential of a compound as antioxidant in in vitro conditions similar to the reallife situation[34]. In the present study, all the solvents used sequentially could exhibit almost equal capacity of lipid peroxidation levels.

Phenolic compounds from plants are a rich source of natural antioxidants and the antioxidant property is mainly due to their redox properties. They act as reducing agents, hydrogen donors, singlet oxygen quenchers and metal chelators[35]. The active hydrogen-donating ability of the hydroxyl substitutions in the phenolic compounds makes them better scavengers of free radicals[36].

From the data presented above, it is evident that phenolic constituents are present at highest level in chloroform extract. But in addition to chloroform extract, methanol extract also showed highest radical scavenging activity. This may be explained on the basis of a possible synergism between phenolic compounds and other phytochemical compounds released in the methanol extract. A similar positive correlation of total polyphenols with antioxidant activity was also reported by Asadi et al. in Salvia species[37]. In addition, a linear correlation between total phenolic content and their antioxidant capacity have been demonstrated in different plant groups by several workers[38-43], while others show poor linear correlation or report total antioxidant activity and phenolic content with no comment[44,45]. However, the results obtained in our study reveal a direct relationship between total phenols and antioxidant potential.

Flavonoids, referred as aglycones in plants, are extracted with solvents based on their polarity. Less polar aglycones such as isoflavones, flavanones dihydroflavonols, higly methylated flavones and flavonols can be extracted with chloroform, ether, ethyl acetate[46,47]. The higher levels of total phenols in chloroform extract as observed in the present study may be due to the presence of flavonoids. It is important to note that the solvents such as alcohols (methanol and ethanol), acetone, ethyl acetate, often with different proportions of water, have been used for the extraction of phenolic compounds from plant materials. In particular, methanol and ethanol have been generally found to be more efficient in extraction of phenolic compounds. For instance, an investigation into the effect of different solvents on extraction of phenolics from the mango ginger showed that methanol was more efficient than other solvents used in the study[48]. Krishnaraj et al.[17] determined phenol content and antioxidant activity of C. caesia in comparison with Curcuma amada. The total phenol contents of the methanol rhizome extracts of C. amada and C. caesia were 37.64 mg and 44.33 mg tannic acid equivalents/g dry material, respectively. Polyphenols found in plant extracts are considered as the major bioactive compounds with antioxidant activity. Since the chemical structures of phenolic compounds determine their properties, identification of the nature of the phenolic compounds in the C. caesia is essential for further evaluation.

The study demonstrates the presence of potent antioxidant activity C. caesia extracts, probably derived from compounds such as flavonoids, phenols and sterols. Solvents with different polarity had significant effects on total phenolic contents, extracted components, and antioxidant activities. Because the specicity and sensitivity are different for each used method, it can be concluded that the same antioxidant samples exhibit different antioxidative values depending on the concentration and the measured antioxidant parameter. The information is of interest to the pharmaceutical industries since the rhizomes are a rich source of antioxidants. This primary information will help in conducting further studies on identification of bioactive constituents, determination of their efficacy by in vivo studies and demonstration of their safety and effectiveness in clinical trials.


The authors would like to thank KSCSTE for the fellowship awarded to the first author and Director, Indian Institute of Spices Research for providing laboratory facilities. We are also thankful to the Head and members of division of Crop Production and PHT for their support.