*Corresponding Author:
Yue Du
Department of Geriatrics, General Hospital of Yangtze River Shipping, Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430030, China
E-mail:
duyue0051@cmc-edu.cn
This article was originally published in a special issue, “New Research Outcomes in Drug and Health Sciences”
Indian J Pharm Sci 2023:85(6) Spl Issue “25-31”

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms

Abstract

This study was to analyze the effects of grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder on blood glucose and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A total of 100 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to March 2021 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 50 patients in each group. The control group was treated with metformin tablets orally and the observation group was additionally treated with grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder and both were treated for 3 mo. Fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c, 2 h postprandial blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment-beta, malondialdehyde, reactive oxygen species, glutathione peroxidase, risk of complications and adverse reactions were observed. After 1 mo and 3 mo of treatment, fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c, 2 h postprandial blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment-beta, malondialdehyde and reactive oxygen species in the observation group were lower, whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance and glutathione peroxidase were higher than those in the control group. After 3 mo of treatment, the observation group was at low risk of developing complications and had no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions. Grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder can effectively reduce oxidative stress, improve insulin resistance, regulate glucose and lipids, and reduce the risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Keywords

Grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, blood glucose, oxidative stress, insulin

In recent years, Diabetes Mellitus (DM) has become the third largest chronic non-communicable disease after cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and tumors. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) accounting for more than 90 % of diabetes is increasing year by year[1,2]. The relationship between oxidative stress and insulin resistance and islet beta (β)-cell damage in patients with T2DM has attracted much attention[3]. Studies have reported that oxidative stress can stimulate and inhibit the activity of the insulin gene promoter, damage mitochondria and islet β-cells, affect insulin synthesis and signaling pathways, and cause islet beta cell dysfunction[4,5]. Inhibiting the oxidative stress-inflammatory state in patients with diabetes can effectively improve insulin resistance, abnormal glucose metabolism and vascular function[6]. Plants are rich in a variety of antioxidant active substances, which can reduce the levels of lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress markers in diabetic patients[7]. Grain amaranth belongs to the amaranth plant and its active ingredients, polyphenols, have the functions of lowering blood glucose, anti-oxidation, and regulating blood lipids[8]. Grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder is a hypoglycemic preparation composed of grain amaranth, aweto, common yam rhizome and lobed kudzuvine root, which can inhibit oxidative stress and reduce the generation of metabolites and oxygen free radicals. In view of this, this study observed the efficacy and safety of grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder in the treatment of T2DM patients.

Materials and Methods

General information:

This study was approved by the hospital ethics committee (No: 2019-241) and 100 patients with T2DM who were admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to March 2021 were selected and randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 50 patients in each. The two groups had no significant difference in general data as shown in Table 1.

Project Observation group Control group t p
(n=50) (n=50)
Male/Female 28/22 26/24 0.161 0.688
Age (Year) 20~69 (50.23±7.45) 21~72 (52.11±8.36) 1.187 0.238
Education 0.038 0.97
Junior high school and below 9 (18.00) 7 (14.00)
High school or technical secondary school 17 (34.00) 20 (40.00)
College degree and above 24 (48.00) 23 (46.00)
History of chronic disease 0.657 0.418
Yes 27 (54.00) 31 (62.00)
No 23 (46.00) 19 (38.00)
Risk of complications 0.599 0.549
Mild 13 (26.00) 10 (20.00)
Moderate 20 (40.00) 21 (42.00)
High 17 (34.00) 19 (38.00)
Body Mass Index (BMI, kg/m2) 0.592 0.554
18.5-23.9 23 (46.00) 26 (52.00)
24.0-27.9 16 (32.00) 15 (30.00)
≥28.0 11 (22.00) 9 (18.00)
Smoking 0.644 0.422
Yes 29 (58.00) 25 (50.00)
No 21 (42.00) 25 (50.00)
Drinking 0.649 0.42
Yes 26 (52.00) 30 (60.00)
No 24 (48.00) 20 (40.00)

Table 1: Comparison of General Information Between the Two Groups

Selection criteria:

Inclusion criteria: Patients are diagnosed for the first time; good compliance and cooperation with treatment and follow-up; have never taken grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder before and patients have signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who participate in other experimental studies during the same period to affect the curative effect; a history of hyperosmolar coma or ketoacidosis in the past 4 w; a history of T2DM complications; any serious heart, liver, kidney dysfunction and malignant tumor; have treated with estrogen, glucocorticoid drugs or immunosuppressive drugs; allergic constitution and contraindications to the drugs used in this study.

Methods:

All were given health education, including lifestyle adjustment, moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, diabetic diet, weight control, drinking and smoking prohibition and staying in a good mood.

Control group: Oral metformin tablets (Bristo-Myers Squibb Company, No. H20023370, specification 0.5 g), 0.5 g/time, 2 times/d, for 3 mo.

Observation group: Oral metformin tablets combined with oral grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder (Wuhan GuangAo Technology Co., Ltd., production license number: SC10642112200062, implementation standard: GB7101-2015, specification 30 g), 1 pack/time, 2 times/d, for 3 mo.

Indicators:

Laboratory indicators: Fasting venous blood was collected before treatment and after 3 mo of treatment, respectively. Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG), Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), 2 h Postprandial Blood Glucose (2hPG), Total Cholesterol (TC), Triglyceride (TG), Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) were measured by an automatic biochemical analyzer. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) was tested by the chemical colorimetric method, Malondialdehyde (MDA) was tested by the thiobarbituric acid method and Glutathione Peroxidase (GSH-Px) was tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Fasting Insulin (FINS) was determined by radioimmunoassay and Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMAIR)=( FPG×FINS)/22.5 and Homeostasis Model Assessment-β (HOMA-β)=20×FINS/(FPG-3.5) were calculated. GSH-Px, MDA and ROS detection kits were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Biological Co., Ltd.

Risk of complications: After 3 mo, the risk of complications in patients was assessed using the EzScan human biostimulation feedback instrument. High-intensity exercise was stopped 2 h before the examination. The electrodes are placed on the soles of the feet and palms of the patient, and the patient stands still for 2-3 min. Risk of peripheral nerve damage includes mild (41 %-60 %), moderate (61 %-80 %), high (81 %-100 %); risk of renal dysfunction includes mild (89 %-60 %), moderate (59 %-30 %), high (29 %-0 %) and risk of vascular complications includes mild (26 %-50 %), moderate (51 %-75 %) and high (76 %-100 %).

Observation of adverse reactions: The adverse reactions caused by drug use were summarized and the major adverse reactions include gastrointestinal symptoms, hypoglycemia and itchy skin.

Statistical analysis:

All data were statistically analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 22.0 software and processed with SPSS 23.0 software. Measurement data (x̄ ±s) were evaluated by t-test, count data (n [%]) were evaluated by χ2 test and rank data were evaluated by Relative to an Identified Distribution (RIDIT) analysis and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results and Discussion

Comparison of blood glucose levels between the two groups was shown in Table 2. Discrepancies in FPG, HbA1c and 2hPG levels were not significant before administration, but the three were lower after combined administration than single administration (fig. 1).

Time Group n FPG (mmol/l) HbA1c (%) 2hPG (mmol/l)
Before treatment Observation group 50 9.66±1.43 9.25±0.78 13.27±2.13
  Control group 50 9.88±1.47 9.14±0.73 13.22±2.10
  t 0.289 0.648 0.602
  p 0.736 0.591 0.564
1 mo after treatment Observation group 50 8.13±0.95a 8.07±0.67a 11.30±1.60a
  Control group 50 9.12±1.15a 8.62±0.73a 12.14±1.67a
  t 5.169 3.169 2.166
  p <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
3 mo after treatment Observation group 50 6.13±0.91a 7.11±0.75a 8.60±1.11a
  Control group 50 7.16±0.94a 8.04±0.77a 9.96±1.30a
  t 6.798 5.984 6.853
  p <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Table 2: Comparison of Blood Glucose Levels Between the Two Groups

pharmaceutical-sciences-level

Fig. 1: Changes in blood glucose levels between the two groups, (Image) Observation group and (Image) Control group

Comparison of blood lipid levels between the two groups was shown in Table 3. TC, TGs, LDL-C and HDL-C exhibited no significant difference before administration, but the former three were reduced and the last was enhanced after combined administration with oral grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder.

Time Group n TC HDL-C LDL-C TGs
Before treatment Observation group 50 6.00±2.12 1.15±0.30 4.15±0.75 3.48±0.85
  Control group 50 6.15±1.99 1.13±0.31 4.05±0.68 3.60±0.92
  t 0.365 0.282 0.699 0.732
  p 0.716 0.779 0.457 0.401
1 mo after treatment Observation group 50 4.56±1.32a 1.28±0.20a 3.00±0.70a 1.85±0.63a
  Control group 50 5.36±1.41a 1.20±0.20a 3.74±0.62a 2.39±0.80a
  t 2.929 1.948 5.596 3.75
  p 0.004 0.048 <0.001 <0.001
3 mo after treatment Observation group 50 3.43±1.11a 1.35±0.23b 2.30±0.51a 1.50±0.42a
  Control group 50 4.48±1.24a 1.26±0.20b 2.91±0.83a 1.96±0.56a
  t 4.461 2.088 4.248 4.467
  p <0.001 0.039 <0.001 <0.001

Table 3: Comparison Of Blood Lipid Levels Between The Two Groups (Mmol/L)

Comparison of islet function between the two groups was shown in Table 4. Before treatment, islet function suggested no difference between the two groups. FINS and HOMA-IR were decreased and HOMA-β was promoted more effectively after combined administration with oral grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder.

Time Group n FINS HOMA-IR HOMA-β
Before treatment Observation group 50 7.65±1.65 3.33±1.32 24.36±5.33
  Control group 50 7.75±1.44 3.39±1.25 24.41±4.85
  t 0.323 0.233 0.049
  p 0.748 0.816 0.961
1 mo after treatment Observation group 50 6.62±1.00a 2.43±0.98a 29.09±5.10a
  Control group 50 7.10±1.04a 2.87±0.92a 25.36±5.65a
  t 2.675 2.315 3.465
  p 0.014 0.023 0.002
3 mo after treatment Observation group 50 6.08±1.12b 1.66±0.73b 45.89±4.32b
  Control group 50 6.76±1.03b 2.21±0.82ab 35.03±5.98b
  t 3.165 3.542 10.409
  p 0.002 0.001 <0.001

Table 4: Comparison of Islet Function Between the Two Groups (Mmol/L)

Comparison of oxidative stress between the two groups was shown in Table 5. Oxidative stress was not significant between the two groups before administration. GSH-Px was more effectively elevated and MDA and ROS were suppressed after combined administration with oral grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder.

Time Group n MDA (nmol/ml) ROS (U/ml) GSH-Px (U/ml)
Before treatment Observation group 50 3.63±1.25 503.25±42.32 68.56±5.78
  Control group 50 3.57±1.36 506.47±45.78 70.12±6.63
  t 0.23 0.365 1.254
  p 0.819 0.716 0.213
1 mo after treatment Observation group 50 2.66±1.01a 423.69±35.54a 79.86±6.10a
  Control group 50 3.11±0.98a 477.52±32.10a 75.32±5.66a
  t 3.124 7.948 3.858
  p <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
3 mo after treatment Observation group 50 2.45±0.74a 365.25±24.26a 84.32±4.78a
  Control group 50 2.98±0.63a 401.22±29.74a 79.55±5.10a
  t 3.856 6.627 4.825
  p <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Table 5: Comparison of Oxidative Stress Between the Two Groups

Comparison of the risk of complications between the two groups was shown in Table 6. After 3 mo, combined administration with oral grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder caused a lower risk of complications in patients than single administration.

Group n Risk of peripheral nerve damage Risk of renal dysfunction Risk of vascular complications
Mild Moderate High Mild Moderate High Mild Moderate High
Observation group 50 32 (64.00) 10 (20.00) 8 (16.00) 36 (72.00) 8 (16.00) 6 (12.00) 30 (60.00) 15 (30.00) 5 (10.00)
Control group 50 15 (30.00) 22 (44.00) 13 (26.00) 17 (34.00) 23 (46.00) 10 (20.00) 20 (40.00) 20 (40.00) 10 (20.00)
χ2 2.785 3.09 1.915
p 0.003 0.002 0.046

Table 6: Comparison of The Risk of Complications between the Two Groups [N (%)]

Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups was shown in Table 7. Combined administration and single administration caused no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions.

Group n Gastrointestinal symptoms Hypoglycemia Itchy skin Incidence
Observation group 50 2 (4.00) 1 (20.00) 3 (6.00) 6 (12.00)
Control group 50 3 (6.00) 2 (4.00) 2 (4.00) 7 (14.00)
χ2 0.088
p 0.766

Table 7: Comparison of Adverse Reactions between the Two Groups [N (%)]

At present, metformin is the basic drug for the treatment of diabetes to effectively control blood glucose and insulin resistance and achieve an antiglycemic effect[9,10]. Fundamentally solving the causes of diabetes, restoring pancreatic islet function and reducing oxidative stress are potentially effective to control blood glucose and reduce insulin usage[11-13]. Therefore, it is imperative to find a safe and effective new therapy for T2DM patients.

Grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder is a hypoglycemic preparation developed by the Radiation Processing Research Institute of Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences in 2003. It is suitable for diabetic patients by exerting a hypoglycemic effect. This study applied it to patients with T2DM and the results showed that after 3 mo of treatment, the blood glucose and blood lipid levels were effectively regulated, suggesting that grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder has a good glucose and lipid regulation effect. Grain amaranth has the characteristics of high quality, high yield, fast growth rate and strong stress resistance. It contains lysine, protein, unsaturated fatty acids and starches necessary for the human body. It is also rich in a variety of physiologically active substances, which can scavenge free radicals in the body and has the effect of delaying aging, regulating fat and glucose, etc.[14]. Thanks to the development of emerging genomics and biotechnology, amaranth is gradually widely used in medicine, food and other fields, and has become an important alternative medicinal plant in some developing countries. Tang et al.[15] pointed out that the S100 Calcium Binding Protein A1 (S100A1) and calcium content in the liver tissue, kidney and blood of T2DM patients are lower, resulting in the decrease of GSH-Px and MDA activity, and grain amaranth as an alternative drug can improve calcium homeostasis through the calcium signaling pathway to exert its anti-glycemic effect. Velarde-Salcedo et al. confirmed that the phenolic compounds in amaranth have the strongest anti-radical properties against 2,2-diphenyl-1-pyridohydrazino radicals, reducing the damage of abnormal blood glucose to the body[16]. In addition, the active ingredient lobed kudzuvine root in grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder is rich in puerarin, which is effective to reduce insulin resistance, improve insulin sensitivity, scavenge free radicals in the body and control blood glucose[17-19]. This study showed that combined administration with grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder lowered FINS and HOMA-IR and heightened HOMA-β.

Oxidative stress is closely related to insulin resistance and islet β-cell damage in patients with T2DM.

Oxidative stress can increase the activity of inhibiting the insulin gene promoter, damage mitochondria and islet β-cells, affect the signaling pathway of insulin secretion and synthesis, cause insulin synthesis to decline, cause irreversible damage to islet β-cell function, and ultimately lead to abnormal blood glucose[20,21]. MDA is a product of lipid peroxidation, which affects mitochondrial phosphorylation and electron transport, and is used to reflect the degree of oxidative stress and membrane lipid peroxidation in the body[22]. ROS can scavenge oxygen free radicals, inhibit oxidative stress and protect the stability of cell structure and function. GSH-Px is an enzyme with a free radical-scavenging function and has a strong antioxidant effect[23]. T2DM patients show responses to oxidative stress MDA, ROS and GSHPx can accurately reflect the oxidative stress status of the body and evaluate T2DM[24]. In this study, the dynamic assessment found that the above oxidative stress factors were gradually improved after combined administration with grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder. In addition, grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder has the functions of lowering blood pressure, improving microcirculation, inhibiting platelet aggregation, reducing plasma endothelin, etc., and can improve insulin sensitivity in patients with T2DM, reduce vascular endothelial cell apoptosis, thereby inhibiting chronic complications of diabetes. In view of this, the EzScan system in this study found that the risk of complications was significantly lower after 3 mo of combined administration with grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder. The use of grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder can help to reduce the risk of diabetes complications, reduce the possibility of diabetes involving other organs and will not significantly increase adverse drug reactions.

To sum up, grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder is a relatively safe hypoglycemic food, as it does not cause complications and adverse reactions. It can improve oxidative stress, effectively control blood glucose and will not cause major damage to the body. However, the sample size of this study is small and the research period is short. In the future, the sample size can be expanded and the follow-up time of the study can be extended to comprehensively and deeply analyze the hypoglycemic effect of grain amaranth hypoglycemic powder.

Funding:

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China with approval number of 81673657 and Wuhan Medical Research Project with approval number of WZ20Z08.

Conflict of interests:

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

References