*Corresponding Author:
S. S. Ghori
Department of Pharmacology,
Anwarul Uloom College of Pharmacy,
Hyderabad, Telangana 500001,
India
E-mail:
[email protected]
Date of Received 09 July 2020
Date of Revision 06 April 2021
Date of Acceptance 07 December 2021
Indian J Pharm Sci 2021;83(6):1314-1319  

Abstract

Lindernia crustacea (L.) F. Muell is one of the commonly used medicinal plants native to India, Indonesia and Malaysia. In the present investigation antibacterial activity of leaf and stem petroleum ether and methanolic extracts was performed at 25 μg/ml, 50 μg/ml, 75 μg/ml and 100 μg/ml concentrations and anthelminthic activity of leaf methanolic extract was performed at 25 μg/ml, 75 μg/ml and 100 μg/ml concentrations. The powdered leaf and stem were extracted by soxhlation and the phytochemical screening of the extracts was performed for detection of phytoconstituents. The leaf petroleum ether and methanolic extracts showed the presence of alkaloids, carbohydrates, tannins and glycosides, whereas the stem petroleum ether and methanolic extracts showed alkaloids, carbohydrates, flavonoids and tannins. Antibacterial activity was performed by cup and plate method using Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli with Penicillin G as standard. Antibacterial activity was not found in both stem and leaf extracts. Anthelminthic activity was performed using Indian earthworm, with albendazole as standard drug. The leaf methanolic extract showed significant anthelminthic activity at 100 μg/ml with paralysis time of 58±3.978 and death time of 79±4.796 as compared with standard drug. The anthelminthic activity of methanolic extract might be due the presence of phytoconstituents as identified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis.

Keywords

Lindernia crustacea, extract, phytoconstituents, antibacterial, antihelminthic

Medicinal plants have been recognised as an excellent source of naturally occuring antimicrobial compounds which can be beneficial in the productive treatment of tricky bacterial infections[1]. According to World Health Organisation (WHO), medicinal plants are operative source to acquire a variety of drugs[2]. Plants produce a library of compounds as protective tools against pathogens and hence are a potential source of antimicrobial substances[3]. Plants are a natural source of compounds used in the treatment of infectious diseases prevailing in the society[4]. Plants and their derived product are used by mankind since ancient times as home remedies[5]. Researchers have proved that plants contain various bioactive constituents which are responsible for combating diseases[6]. A number of plants have antimicrobial activity as a result of the synthesized secondary metabolities[7,8]. Several traditional plants are used as medicines for the treatment due to lesser side effects. Microbes play a major role in ecosystem because they act as decomposers. Antimicrobials are drugs that kill microorganisms or stops their multiplication or growth. Anthelminthics are a class of antiparasitic drugs that expel the parasitic worms and other helminth parasites from the body by killing them without causing any significant effect or damage to the host. Lindernia crustacea (L. crustacea) is an annual herb belonging to family linderniaceae which is used medicinally throughout the world. Apart from India, it is commonly used in Indonesia and Malaysia as medicine. It is used to treat ear ache[9], injury, fever and thrush[10], anti-inflammatory for skin to relieve itching, boils, sores, dysentery, ringworm[11,12] which needs to be explored yet. It is found to be an effective against various rodents[13]. It is also reported to show anticancer[14] and antioxidant[15] activities. Many other species of the same family have been reported for antimicrobial and anthelminthic activity. L. anagallis has shown antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus[16]. Similarly L. madayiparensi has been reported for anthelminthic activity against Indian earthworm[17]. Moreover the phytochemical screening data of the L. crustacea earlier reported showed the presence of various phytoconstituents. In the present work an attempt was made to screen the antibacterial and antihelminthic activity of leaf and stem extracts of the plant. The plant material was collected from local plant supplier and was authenticated and given voucher no. 237 by Department of Botany, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. All the chemicals and solvents used were procured from a certified chemical supplier. The solvents used were of analytical reagent grade, FINAR (Batch No: 340400210BU). The leaves and stems of L. crustacea were washed to make them free from soil and dust and were dried under shade for about 5-7 d and then weighed. The plant parts were grinded separately using mechanical grinder provided by Philips HI 1645 750 watt and stored in air tight containers at room temperature for further use. The petroleum ether and methanol extracts of leaf and stem were obtained by using soxhlation. In the present study, 16.6 g of dried powder of leaves and stems were extracted by using 400 ml of petroleum ether and methanol each at 50° and 60° respectively. The extracts were then concentrated using rotavapor at 45° and 55° and stored in air tight containers for further investigation. Phytochemical investigation was performed for both leaf and stem extracts for the presence of phytoconstituents using standard qualitative methods[18]. The leaf extract was analysed by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis for identification of different chemical components. LC-MS was performed by standard procedure using Column-Symmetry C18 (4.6×150 mm, 5 μm particle size). The sample (10 μl) is injected after diluting with methanol directly into the source by the flow injection method using Acetonitrile (ACN):water (74:26 % v/v) as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.7 ml/min. The mass spectra were recorded in Electrospray Ionization (ESI) positive mode. Ultra-high purity nitrogen and helium were used as curtain and collision gases respectively. The typical ion source conditions were: nebulizer gas, 60 psi, dry temperature 400o, dwell time 200 ms. The sample flow rate was 1.7 ml/min, wavelength 225 nm, column temperature 40o, with 10 μl injection volume and a total run time on 7 min. The procedure followed was cup plate method using nutrient agar media[19]. The antibacterial activity of petroleum ether and methanolic extract at 25 μg/ml, 50 μg/ml, 75 μg/ml and 100 μg/ml was tested using Staphylococcus aureus (gram positive strain) and Escherichia coli (gram negative strain) using Penicillin G as standard. A sterile borer was used to prepare 3 cups of 8 mm diameter in the medium of each petri dish. The centre cup was taken as standard, its zone of inhibition was measured for comparison with test drug. The compound to be tested was transferred into the wells by using micro pipette. Every time the tip was discarded and another clean tip was used for the new compound. The plates were incubated for 12-24 h and the zone of inhibition was measured. The assay was performed on Indian earthworm. 20 ml formulation containing three different concentrations (25, 75, 100 μg/ml) in distilled water were prepared. The test solution and standard drug solution were freshly prepared and time of paralysis was noted when no movement of any sort could be observed except when worms were shaken vigorously. The time of death was recorded after ascertaining that the worms did not move when shaken vigorously. Albendazole (15 μg/ml) was used as reference standard and distilled water as the vehicle. The results of phytochemical screening data of the extracts of L. crustacea showed the presence of alkaloids, carbohydrates, flavonoids, tannins and glycosides. It can be seen that the petroleum and methanolic extract of the leaf and stem are excellent source of different phytochemicals. Both the leaf and stem extracts showed the presence of alkaloids, carbohydrates and tannins. The leaf extracts also shows the presence of glycosides whereas they are absent in stem extract. The results are shown in Table 1. The test solution showed no zone of inhibition, showing no antibacterial activity as shown in Table 2. Anthelminthic activity was investigated on methanolic extracts of leaf at 25 μg/ml, 75 μg/ml and 100 μg/ml concentrations. The methanolic leaf extracts showed anthelminthic effect in a dose dependant manner. Albendazole was taken as the reference standard. The methanolic leaf extract of L. crustacea caused paralysis at 58 min and death time 79 min at 100 μg/ml concentration as depicted in Table 3. The active components were identified in the leaf extract of L. crustacea by LC-MS.

Tests Petroleum ether leaf Methanol leaf   Petroleum
ether stem
Methanol stem
Test for Alkaloids      
1. Dragendroff’s test Positive Positive Positive Positive
2. Wagner’s test Positive Positive Positive Positive
Test for carbohydrates      
1. Barfoed’s test Positive Positive Positive Positive
Test for Flavonoid      
1. Sulphuric acid test Negative Negative Positive Positive
2. Lead acetate test Positive Positive Positive Positive
Test for saponins      
1.Froth formation test Negative Negative Negative Negative
Test for tannins and phenolic compounds      
1. Ferric chloride test Positive Positive Positive Positive
2. Lead acetate test Positive Positive Positive Positive
3. Gelatin test Positive Positive Positive Positive
Test for glycosides      
1. Killerkilliani Positive Positive Negative Negative
2. Salkowski Positive Positive Positive Negative

Table 1: Phytochemical Screening of Leaf and Stem Extract of L. Crustacea

S. No Bacterial strains Petroleum ether leaf extract Methanolic leaf extract Petroleum ether stem extract Methanolic stem extract
25 µg/ml 50 µg/ml 75 µg/ml 100 µg/ml 25 µg/ml 50 µg/ml 75 µg/ml 100 µg/ml 25 µg/ml 50 µg/ml 75 µg/ml 100 µg/ml 25 µg/ml 50 µg/ml 75 µg/ml 100 µg/ml
1 Escherichia coli - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2 Staphylococci - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Table 2: Antibacterial Activity of Leaf and Stem Petroleum Ether and Methanolic Extracts of L. Crustacea

Time (min) Test dose Test dose Test dose Standard
(25 µg/ml) (75 µg/ml) (100 µg/ml) (15 µg/ml)
Paralysis time 67±5.6663 59.125±6.212 58±3.978 25±0.000
Death time 112±4.692 109.25±8.182 79±3.726 38±0.000

Table 3: Anthelmintic Activity of Methanolic Extract of L. Crustacea Leaf

The compounds were identified by their molecular peaks and retention time as shown in fig. 1 and Table 4 respectively. A novel approach has been performed for quantification of the plant. LC-MS interpretation was performed using standard spectrum database. LC-MS chromatogram is shown in fig. 2. It was found that five different constituents were identified which were further separated to estimate their amount of percentage in the plant part. All the identified compounds were chloro and nitro derivatives as shown in Table 5. In the present study, petroleum ether and methanolic extracts of leaf and stem of the plant were investigated for antibacterial activity and methanolic extract of leaf for anthelminthic activity. The extracts did not show antibacterial activity. However, it can be further investigated against other bacterial and fungal strains. There was promising anthelminthic activity which was dose dependant. Earthworms are used widely for initial in vitro anthelminthic investigation studies[20]. The anthelminthic activity can be attributed to the presence of phenolic compounds and tannins in the extract. Polyphenolic compounds and tannins in general show anthelminthic activity. Some synthetic phenolic antihelminthics for e.g. Niclosamide, oxyclozanide and Bitionol are shown to interface with energy generation in helminth parasites by uncoupling oxidative phoshorylation. The effect of albenzadole on the worms is to cause flaccid paralysis those results in expulsion of the worms by peristalsis. It acts by increasing chloride ion conductance of worm muscle membrane producing hyperpolarisation and reducing excitability which leads to muscle relaxation and flaccid paralysis[21]. A novel approach has been performed for quantification of the plant. The LC-MS analysis of the extracts revealed the presence of number of compounds which were evident by their molecular peaks. However further isolation and characterisation of the compounds can be carried out. Antibacterial activity was not found in both stem and leaf extract. This may be due to resistance of extract to the specific microorganisms used in procedure. However, the extracts can be tested for antimicrobial activity by using other strains of gram positive and gram negative bacteria. The leaf methanolic extract of L. crustacea showed significant anthelminthic activity at all the tested doses when compared to control as vermifuge and vermicidal drug while the highest activity was shown at the highest concentration (100 μg/ml). Hence, this plant can be an alternative source of anthelmintic drug and can generate new active leads. The LC-MS analysis showed the presence of various compounds which may be responsible for anthelminthic activity.

IJPS-analysis

Fig. 1: LC-MS analysis of methanolic leaf extract of L. crustacea

IJPS-chromatogram

Fig. 2: LC-MS chromatogram of methanolic leaf extract of L. crustacea

S. No Name Rt Area Height USP plate count USP Tailing Percentage Found
1 Component 1 0.526 34724 58631 5043 1.1 25.38 %
2 Component 2 1.342 25080 34821 5432 1.2 18.33 %
3 Component 3 2.815 34536 58451 5987 1.4 25.24 %
4 Component 4 4.823 24866 34710 5845 1.2 18.17 %
5 Component 5 5.378 17574 21247 5371 1.1 12.84 %
Mean 27356
Standard deviation 7295.677

Table 4: Retention Time (rt) of Methanolic Leaf Extract of L. Crustacea

Observed ion mass (Da) Proposed formula Predicted Name Predicted Structure Calculated Weight
288 C6H6Cl6 2,2,3,4,5,5-Hexachloro-3-hexene

290.83
325 C11H10Cl3NO4 Diethyl 3,4,5-trichloropyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate

326.56
347 C10H13Cl3NO2PS O-Ethyl O-(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl) ethylphosphoramidothioate

348.61
359 C15H22INO 8-Iodo-N-(4-methylphenyl)octanamide

359.24
399 C23H36F3NO Benzamide, N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)-2,3,4-trifluoro-

399.53

Table 5: Elemental Analysis of Leaf Extract of L. Crustacea

Acknowledgements:

We are thankful to Dr. Nadeem Fatima, Head, Department of Biotechnology, Anwarul Uloom PG College, Hyderabad, India and Mrs. Sameena, Assistant Professor, Anwarul Uloom College of Pharmacy, India for providing research facilities for antimicrobial studies.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References