*Corresponding Author:
Vineeta Rathore
Department of Agronomy,
College of Agriculture,
G.B.P.U.A.&T., Pantnagar, U. S. Nagar,
Date of Received 08 April 2020
Date of Revision 15 December 2020
Date of Acceptance 18 December 2020
Indian J Pharm Sci 2020;82(5):787-798  

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms


Carbon nanotubes were discovered in 1991, Sumio Iijima gives the theory of carbon nanotubes which is made up of carbon allotrope graphene having brilliant electrical, mechanical, optical and synthetic properties, pulling in extensive enthusiasm for their application in different fields including drug conveyance and malignancy treatment. Malignancy is one of the most testing sicknesses of present day times since its treatment includes recognizing ordinary sound cells from influenced cells. Here, carbon nanotubes assume a significant job since marvels, for example, electronic paramagnetic resonance, permit carbon nanotubes to recognize typical cells from influenced ones, the Holy Grail in malignancy treatment. Significant work has been done on carbon nanotubes as medication conveyance frameworks throughout the most recent 20 y. Not with standing, worries over specific issues, for example, biocompatibility and poisonousness have been raised and warrant broad exploration in this field. For the preparation of Single-walled carbon nanotubes and Multi-walled carbon nanotubes arc discharge, laser ablation and chemical vapor deposition method of preparation are used. By the process of acid treatment, magnetic purification and size exclusion chromatography carbon nanotubes impurities are removed out. Because of hydrophobic nature of carbon nanotubes, Covalent and non-covalent functionalization are done for the surface modification. Cytotoxic of carbon nanotubes have a beneficial effect in cancer treatment. Drug released from carbon nanotubes by using various stimulants such as electric, magnetic field and changes in pH.


Correlation, European dill, Anethum graveolens, irrigation, FYM, yield and oil content, carvone, dillapiole

In recent decades, the scope of cultivation of medicinal herbs especially in developed countries is increasing due to the side-effects of chemical medications, environmental restrictions and gradual tendency of majority people to go for herb therapy. European Dill (Anethum graveolens Linn.) is an herbaceous plant belonging to the family of Umbelliferae (Apiaceae). Dill has a very long history of usage dating back to more than 2000 y, and presently it is cultivated all over the world, in India, Iran, China, South Europe, Bulgaria and Estonia.

In traditional medicine system, Anethum graveolens is used for digestion problems, liver problems as well as in kidney diseases [1].

Fresh and dried leaves are used as a carminative, stomachic, antispasmodic herb in Indian medicine.

They are also used for the prevention and treatment of diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and urinary tract.

According to Setorki et al., 2013 [2], A. graveolens can reduce the negative effects of postprandial cholesterol rich diet and an effective choice for preventing some of the risk factors of atherosclerosis. The seeds (fruits) are used for many medicinal purposes as stomachic, antipyretic, carminative, sedative, lactagogue, antispasmodic, stimulant, antidysenteric, diuretic, laxative, anthelmintic and used to treat gastric ulcers, abdominal pain, eye diseases, urinary pains, neuralgia, bronchial asthma, haemorrhoids, genital ulcers and dysmenorrhoea [3,4]. It is also used for treatment of griping pains [5]. Dried and ripe fruits are used in pediatric complaints, such as flatulence and weak digestion [6]. Essential oil of dill seed has been investigated in connection with their antimicrobial, antiseptic and exhibits anticarcinogenic activity and antioxidant [7].

The herb (0.5 to 1.2 %) and seed (2.5 to 3.5 %) of this crop contain an essential oil popularly known as dill oil. The most important essential oil compounds from this plant are d-carvone and phellandrene, whereas the most important compounds from the fully grown seeds are carvone, limonene dihydrocarvone, phellandrene and dillapiole. European cultivar is superior to all cultivars for the best volatile oil content as well quality [8]. Seed oil is considered to be of good quality due to presence of more carvone and least dillapiole contents. In medicinal plants, the content of metabolite is economically more important than the crude yield of the plant part containing the metabolite [9].

The price of European dill seed oil varies between Rs. 1500-2000/kg [10]. Owing to its diversified uses, commercial value of the essential oils from the fruits (seeds) of dill is a good source of foreign exchange and, growers are looking it as a new cash crop. So, there is need to raise the productivity of dill crop by adopting scientific cultivation methods.

However, the goal of higher production and good quality essential oil can be achieved with judicious water management and good nutrient supply. Therefore, the present investigation was carried out to study the effect of irrigation scheduling and farmyard manure (FYM) nutrition on growth, yield components and yield of European dill as well on the quality of dill oil.

Materials and Methods

A field experiment was conducted for 2 y at N.E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre and laboratory studies were undertaken in the department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, respectively at G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, U. S. Nagar, Uttarakhand, India. Pantnagar is located at 29° N latitude, 79.3° E longitude and at an altitude of 243.8 metres above mean sea level in Tarai region of Uttarakhand which falls in humid subtropical zone. The soil of the experimental site was fine sandy loam in texture and the surface (0-15 cm) soil was rich in organic carbon content, low in available nitrogen, medium in available phosphorus and potassium and it was neutral in reaction. The climate of Pantnagar is subtropicalsub- subtropicalsub- humid with extremes of weather conditions, having hot and dry summers and cold winters.

The treatments comprising 4 levels of irrigation scheduled at 50 (I50), 100 (I100), 150 (I150) and 200 (I200) mm cumulative pan evaporation (CPE) and 3 levels of soil fertility viz, 0 (F0), 15 (F15) and 30 (F30) t FYM ha- 1, which were evaluated in factorial randomized block design with three replications. The field was irrigated 3 w before sowing to maintain moisture and facilitate field operations. The field was prepared by one ploughing and two cross harrowing followed by levelling. The crop was sown during two consecutive winter seasons (known as rabi season) in mo of December and harvested in the mo of May. The net plot size was 2.4 m×2.4 m. Well decomposed and pulverized farmyard manure (FYM) broadcasted carefully in different amounts in each plot as per treatments 2 d before sowing and mixed uniformly and thoroughly by digging with the help of spade. The crop was raised by direct seeding at a seed rate of 5 kg ha-1. Seeds were pre-soaked in water and kept moist for 48 h before sowing and sown in 3-4 cm deep furrows with maintaining the spacing of 40 cm (row to row)×30 cm (plant to plant) in each plot. Extra seedlings were thinned out at 20 d after sowing to obtain constant number of plants in each row of all the plots. Wherever required, gap filling was done using the uprooted seedlings from the same plot during thinning.

The experimental field had a good tube well facility so scheduling of irrigation to the crop was not a problem. One common irrigation was given in each plot 25 d after sowing for proper crop establishment. Postsowing irrigations of 60 mm depth were applied as per treatment details. Irrigation treatments were executed by providing irrigation channels between the plots. Subsequent irrigation treatments were scheduled based on CPE data. Irrigation water was measured with the help of Parshall flume under free flow conditions fixed in the irrigation channel to provide water upto 60 mm depth of soil at each irrigation. Depending upon rainfall, number of irrigation was applied as per treatments. Treatment combinations are detailed below:

For the observations on growth and yield attributes, two rows from left side of each plot were used for destructive sampling and five plants were randomly selected from net plot area and tagged before starting observation. After proper sun drying, the umbels were threshed manually. Thereafter, the seeds were collected, cleaned and weighed. Seed yield was expressed in q ha-1. The crop quality was judged by extracting oil from seeds and active principles present in oil. For obtaining seed oil, water distillation method using Clevenger’s type glass distillation apparatus was used. Immediate after crop harvesting and threshing, essential oil was distilled from fresh seeds. Distillation process for each sample was continued for 3 h. The essential oil content was calculated using formula:

Essential oil content (% volume by weight basis)=Quantity of Essential oil (ml)/Seed weight (g)×100

For determination of oil constituents, filtered dehydrated essential oil samples were analyzed by using Gas-liquid chromatography. The Retardation Factor (RF) value of pure carvone was obtained by injecting 0.2 μ ml of pure liquid carvone (standard) diluted 4 times with ethanol with micro-syringe. The area percentage obtained in chromatographs was taken as percentage of the major constituents’ viz., carvone, limonene and dillapiole.

Seed, oil and carvone yield was calculated by using following formulae: Seed yield (q/ha)=seed yield (g) per plot/5.76×10, Oil yield (kg/ha)=seed yield (kg/ ha)×Oil content in seed (%)×Specific gravity* of seed/100, *specific gravity of essential oil of Anethum graveolens is: (0.87 g/cc), (iii) Carvone yield (kg/ ha)=Oil yield (kg/ha)×Carvone content in seed oil (%)/100.

The statistical analysis [11] of the data was done by following the standard procedures. The correlation matrix was prepared with the software IBM SPSS statistics V22 [12].

Results and Discussion

Seed, oil and carvone yields of fresh seeds during both the years were found to be the highest under 100 mm CPE level while during 2nd y, being at par with 50 mm CPE level caused significantly more seed yield compared to 150 and 200 mm CPE levels of scheduling irrigation (Table 1). Increasing levels of FYM caused significant increase in seed, oil and carvone yield during 1st y while during 2nd y application of 30 tonnes FYM/ ha caused significantly more yield compared to 0 and 15 tonnes FYM/ha.

S. No. Treatment combinations Treatment notation
50 mm CPE without FYM I50 F0
50 mm CPE with 15 t ha-1 FYM I50 F15
50 mm CPE with 30 t ha-1 FYM I50 F30
100 mm CPE without FYM I100 F0
100 mm CPE with 15 t ha-1 FYM I100 F15
100 mm CPE with 30 t ha-1 FYM I100 F30
150 mm CPE without FYM I150 F0
150 mm CPE with 15 t ha-1 FYM I150 F15
150 mm CPE with 30 t ha-1 FYM I150 F30
200 mm CPE without FYM I200 F0
200 mm CPE with 15 t ha-1 FYM I200 F15
200 mm CPE with 30 t ha-1 FYM I200 F30

Table 1: Treatment Details

Higher yield at 100 mm CPE level might be because of higher dry matter accumulation which resulted in enhanced growth characters and yield attributes by providing reserve food for reproductive phase thus the number of fruits and seed weight were also found to be higher. Farmyard manure at its higher levels was expected to provide about 75, 37.5 and 75 kg N, P, and K/ha through 15 tonnes FYM/ha and 150, 75 and 150 kg N, P, and K/ha at 30 tonnes FYM/ha levels, respectively and was expected to meet the total nutrients requirement of the crop. In addition, it provided all micronutrients which are essential for plant growth and secondary metabolites synthesis and also activate the microbial growth which helps in making nutrients more available [13].

Interestingly, the oil content in seeds was found to be significantly higher when crop was irrigated at 200 mm CPE compared to the remaining irrigation levels during 1st y though the differences disappeared during 2nd y, where irrigating the crop at 150 mm CPE level gave the highest oil content (Table 2). Water stress imposed by restricting the number of irrigations increased the percentages of volatile oils in parsley and fennel [14]. It has been also studied by Kaur and Arora [15] that essential oil plays an important role in mechanism of drought resistance via reduction in transpiration. Ezz et al., [16], found the stress conditions accelerated the biosynthesis of essential oils. The 30 tonnes/ha FYM application caused significantly more oil content in seeds compared to 0 and 15 tonnes/ha FYM levels during both the years.

Treatments Fresh seed
I year II Year
  Seed yield (kg ha-1) Oil yield (kg ha-1) Carvone yield
(kg ha-1)
Seed yield (kg ha-1) Oil yield (kg ha-1) Carvone yield
(kg ha-1)
Irrigation levels (mm CPE)
50 10.88 22.70 18.91 9.75 26.72 19.73
100 11.71 25.87 21.66 11.44 31.17 23.15
150 9.95 21.07 17.58 7.45 21.30 15.68
200 9.12 20.67 17.37 8.02 22.95 17.11
SEm± 0.21 0.59 0.49 0.71 2.25 1.67
C.D. at 5 % 0.63 1.74 1.45 2.08 6.61 4.90
FYM levels (t ha-1)
0 9.32 15.77 12.96 8.42 21.55 15.69
15 10.66 23.19 19.52 8.14 22.37 16.71
30 11.26 28.78 24.16 10.95 32.69 24.34
SEm± 0.18 0.51 0.43 0.61 1.95 1.43
C.D. at 5 % 0.54 1.51 1.26 1.80 5.72 4.24

Table 2: Yield (kg ha-1) Of Fresh Seed As Influenced By The Different Treatments

Increase in yield due to adequate amount of irrigation and FYM application could be ascribed to good availability and better utilization of nutrients, increased synthesis of carbohydrates leading to good vegetative and reproductive growth [17].

Coefficient of correlation between various growth parameters and yield attributes are presented in Table 3.

Parameters Y LV DMA UL/
PH I 0.701* 0.285 0.989* 0.986* 0.969* 0.976* 0.980* 0.972* 0.983* 0.987* 0.980*
II 0.985* 0.906* 0.983* 0.987* 0.972* 0.977* 0.991* 0.989* 0.994* 0.967* 0.991*
LV I - 0.158 0.755* 0.718* 0.711* 0.762* 0.773* 0.719* 0.770* 0.758* 0.735*
II - 0.955* 0.995* 0.960* 0.989* 0.987* 0.991* 0.971* 0.974* 0.989* 0.979*
DMA I - - 0.310 0.275 0.310 0.377 0.712* 0.332 0.343 0.367 0.336
II - - 0.955* 0.864* 0.971* 0.936* 0.931* 0.891* 0.885* 0.968* 0.897*
UL/MS I - - - 0.969* 0.956* 0.964* 0.970* 0.964* 0.980* 0.985* 0.972*
II - - - 0.968* 0.994* 0.994* 0.994* 0.980* 0.974* 0.995* 0.981*
UL/PB I - - - - 0.993* 0.983* 0.985* 0.986* 0.985* 0.985* 0.991*
II - - - - 0.954* 0.968* 0.981* 0.996* 0.994* 0.947* 0.987*
UL/SB I - - - - - 0.975* 0.973* 0.991* 0.977* 0.980* 0.992*
II - - - - - 0.987* 0.987* 0.968* 0.961* 0.964* 0.962*
UL/TB I - - - - - - 0.980* 0.986* 0.994* 0.993* 0.989*
II - - - - - - 0.992* 0.979* 0.968* 0.993* 0.974*
NS/MS I - - - - - - - 0.974* 0.978* 0.978* 0.978*
II - - - - - - - 0.990* 0.985* 0.986* 0.988*
NS/PB I - - - - - - - - 0.989* 0.988* 0.977*
II - - - - - - - - 0.993* 0.964* 0.992*
NS/SB I - - - - - - - - - 0.996* 0.993*
II - - - - - - - - - 0.952* 0.993*
NS/TB I - - - - - - - - - - 0.993*
II - - - - - - - - - - 0.961*

Table 3: Correlation Between Growth Parameters and Yield Attributes

Various growth parameters and yield attributes were found to be significantly and positively correlated with each other during both the years however the positive correlation was found between plant height and dry matter accumulation; leaf volume and dry matter accumulation; dry matter accumulation with umbellets per umbel on main shoot, umbellets per umbel on primary branches, umbellets per umbel on secondary branches, umbellets per umbel on tertiary branches, number of seeds per umbel on primary branches, number of seeds per umbel on secondary branches, number of seeds per umbel on tertiary branches and seed weight during 1st y. Higher values for growth parameters correlated well with yield attributes to the crops viz. fennel, carrot, cumin and other umbelliferous rabi crops have also been reported by Sharma and Prasad, Batra and Kallo, Patel et al., Singh and Mahey, Jangir and Singh, Milia et al. and Singh et al. [18-24]. The higher dry matter accumulation towards maturity accelerate reproductive phase and seed formation which might have caused more number of fruits per umbel ultimately resulting in more seed yield [25].

The higher dry matter accumulation enhanced yield attributes by providing reserve food for reproductive phase thus, the number of umbels on different branches, number of umbellets per umbel, number of fruits per umbel and 1000 seed weight were found higher. More number of primary, secondary and tertiary branches produced more number of umbels, number of umbellets per umbel, fruits per umbel and test weight. All growth parameters were found to be positively associated with seed yield during both the years (Table 4).

Parameters Y Primary branches Secondary
Tertiary branches Dry matter accumulation (g m-2) Leaf volume   (m-3) Seed yield
(q ha-1)
Plant Height (cm) I 0.940* 0.944* 0.597* 0.285 0.701* 0.989*
II 0.869* 0.963* 0.956* 0.906* 0.985* 0.560
Primary branches I - 0.877* 0.447 0.226 0.801* 0.945*
II - 0.868* 0.871* 0.788* 0.853* 0.717*
Secondary branches I - - 0.483 0.280 0.786* 0.969*
II - - 0.962* 0.941* 0.971* 0.652*
Tertiary branches I - - - 0.039 0.371 0.537
II - - - 0.974* 0.985* 0.668*
Dry matter accumulation (g m-2) I - - - - 0.158 0.320
II - - - - 0.955* 0.706*
Leaf volume (m-3) I - - - - - 0.766*
II - - - - - 0.631*

Table 4: Correlation Between Growth Parameters And Seed Yield

A significant and positive correlation between plant height and various branches, dry matter accumulation, leaf volume was found during both the years. The seed yield was found to be positively correlated with plant height; however significant association was noticed during 1st y. Primary branches were also found to be significantly positively correlated with secondary branches, leaf volume and seed yield during both the years and with tertiary branches and leaf volume during 2nd y. Secondary branches had significant positive correlation with tertiary branches and dry matter accumulation during 2nd y and during both the years with leaf volume and seed yield. Though, tertiary branches had positive correlation with dry matter accumulation, leaf volume and seed yield but it was significant only during 2nd y. Dry matter accumulation was significantly and positively associated with seed yield during 2nd y while during 1st y this positive association was non-significant. Leaf volume and seed yield were found to be significantly positively associated with each other during both the years. Also, studies by Escalante Estrada et al.,[26] and Zhao et al.[27] indicated that the production of the dry matter or biomasses of any plant is determined by the higher value of LAD (leaf area duration) and NAR (net assimilation rate). Decrease in LAD and NAR was found to be strongly correlated with a decrease in biomass [28].

Various yield attributes were also found to be positively associated with seed yield and with each other during both the years (Table 5).

Parameters Y UL/U on PB UL/U on SB UL/U on TB NS/U on MS NS/U on PB NS/U on SB NS/U
on TB
Seed Weight (g) Seed Yield (q ha-1)
UL/U on MS I 0.969* 0.959* 0.964* 0.970* 0.964* 0.980* 0.985* 0.972* 0.993*
II 0.968* 0.994* 0.994* 0.994* 0.980* 0.974* 0.995* 0.981* 0.655*
UL/U on PB I - 0.993* 0.983* 0.985* 0.986* 0.985* 0.985* 0.991* 0.965*
II - 0.954* 0.968* 0.981* 0.996* 0.994* 0.947* 0.987* 0.560
UL/U on SB I - - 0.975* 0.973* 0.991* 0.977* 0.980* 0.992* 0.945*
II - - 0.987* 0.987* 0.968* 0.961* 0.994* 0.962* 0.674*
UL/U on TB I - - - 0.980* 0.986* 0.994* 0.993* 0.989* 0.971*
II - - - 0.992* 0.979* 0.968* 0.993* 0.974* 0.622*
NS/U on MS I - - - - 0.974* 0.978* 0.978* 0.978* 0.967*
II - - - - 0.990* 0.985* 0.986* 0.988* 0.629*
NS/U on PB I - - - - - 0.989* 0.988* 0.997* 0.953*
II - - - - - 0.993* 0.964* 0.992* 0.586*
NS/U on SB I - - - - - - 0.996* 0.993* 0.981*
II - - - - - - 0.952* 0.993* 0.572
on TB
I - - - - - - - 0.993* 0.985*
II - - - - - - - 0.961* 0.647*
Seed Weight (g) I - - - - - - - - 0.967*
II - - - - - - - - 0.602*

Table 5 : Correlation Between Yield Attributes and Seed Yield

Umbellets per umbel and seeds per umbel on main shoot and different branches were found to be significantly positively associated with each other, with 1000 seed weight and with seed yield during both the years.

The data pertaining to correlation coefficients between oil content, seed, oil and carvone yield are presented in Table 6. The correlation coefficients for the different variables assessed for seed yield were observed to be positively correlated with oil content and oil yield.

Parameters Year Seed yield (q ha-1) Oil yield (Kg ha-1)
Oil content (%) I 0.505 0.890*
II 0.293 0.513
Seed yield  (q ha-1) I - 0.837*
II - 0.967*

Table 6: Correlation Between Oil Content, Seed and Oil Yield

Oil content was found to be non-significantly positively associated with seed yield during both the years, and oil yield during 2nd y. A strong significant positive correlation (r=0.967 at p=0.05) was observed between seed and oil yield during both the years.

As oil yield is the function of seed yield and oil content. In spite of, comparatively less oil content in seeds obtained, the oil yield was found more because of increased seed yield.

Limonene was found to be negatively correlated with carvone, dillapiole, oil content and oil yield during both the years (Table 7).

Parameters Year Limonene
Carvone (%) Dillapiole (%) Oil content
Oil yield
(kg ha-1)
Limonene (%) I year - -0.528 -0.065 -0.240 -0.031
II year - -0.528 -0.066 -0.075 -0.203
Carvone (%) I year - - -0.728* 0.798* 0.670*
II year - - -0.728* 0.442 0.231
Dillapiole (%) I year - - - -0.752* -0.777*
II year - - - -0.405 -0.580*
Oil content (%) I year - - - - 0.890*
II year - - - - 0.513

Table 7: Correlation Between Oil Content, Constituents and Oil Yield Of Fresh Seeds

Carvone was found to be positively correlated with oil content and oil yield during both the years however it was significant only during 1 y. This study is also supported by Yassen and Khalid [29] who observed that as volatile oil improved the some of the main constituents of essential oil in onion were also improved.

Dillapiole was negatively correlated with oil content and oil yield, however, the association was significant between dillapiole and oil content during 1 y and between dillapiole and oil yield during both the years. Oil content and oil yield were positively correlated during both the years, however, it was significant during 1 y.

The quality of dill seed oil is determined by its constituents. Higher carvone and limonene contents and negligible dillapiole content in oil has been reported to be of good quality [30]. Sandermann and Bruns [31] reported that limonene is an intermediate in the biosynthesis of carvone as depicted in fig.1.


Figure 1: Biosynthesis of carvone

The finding of the present study that limonene content was negatively correlated with carvone content was strongly supported by observation of Jana and Shekhawat [32] that carvone increased at the expense of limonene and vice versa (fig. 2).


Figure 2: Enzymatic pathway depicting synthesis of limonene and carvone in seeds of Anethum graveolens

The dillapiole is considered to be toxic to human consumption at more than 5 % in essential oil and thus, quality of essential oil is considered better if dillapiole content in the oil varies between 0 to 5 %.

On the basis of results, it can be concluded that to get enhanced quantity as well quality of essential oil and improved production per unit area of Anethum graveolens L., crop must be irrigated at 100 mm CPE at 6 cm depth depends on rainfall and fertilized with 15-30 t FYM/ha. Also, overall growth and yield attributes had a strong correlation impact on plant biomass production influencing production, productivity and quality of Anethum graveolens L.