*Corresponding Author:
Y. J. Qi
Department of Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou, PR China
E-mail: qiajiao@163.com
Date of Submission 07 June 2016
Date of Revision 22 August 2016
Date of Acceptance 07 June 2016
Indian J Pharm Sci 2016;78(4):512-524  

This is an open access article distributed under terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows other the remix, tweak, and build up to the non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.


β-glucosidase is one of the critical enzymes to the type 2 diabetes, which belongs to a large family of glycoside hydrolases. In this article, we attempted to explore the binding modes between two drugs and β-glucosidases by comparing their bonding modes with β-glucosidases from different species. Results showed that the binding orientations and geometrical conformation of synthetic drug (miglitol) and natural product (quercetin) were all different in all active sites, which may be related to the flexibility of the molecules. Compared with the conformations obtained by density functional theory calculations at the B3LYP/6-31G* level, the docking conformations indicated that the -CH2CH2OH group of miglitol and the B ring of quercetin were the most critical groups to the stabilities in the active sites. Finally, protein sequence alignment was performed under default parameters. Although the sequence similarity is not very high between these β-glucosidases, the residues related to the active sites were conservative; especially the one involved in H-bond interactions between three species, namely soil metagenome, Micrococcus antarcticus and termite Neotermes koshunensis.


β-glucosidase, binding mode, docking conformation, sequence alignment D-optimal design

Diabetes is rapidly becoming an enormous health burden by decreasing quality of life all over the world. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disease associated with micro- and macrovascular complications such as diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy and cardiovascular diseases. One of therapeutic approaches for managing increased blood glucose is to weaken the catalytic activity of key enzymes involved in hydrolytic cleavage of dietary oligosaccharides[1], and thus the blood glucose in the diabetics and a series of possible side effects will decrease. β-glucosidase is one of the key enzymes, which belongs to a large family of glycoside hydrolases. Many of β-glucosidases can also catalyze the synthesis of poly- or oligosaccharides, which have dual activities of hydrolysis and transglycosylation [2,3].

By delaying the absorption of digested carbohydrates from the small intestine, β-glucosidase inhibitors can also attenuate postprandial blood glucose fluctuations [4-6]. There are great number of studies about the inhibiting capacity of the glucosidase[7-10]. For example, inhibitor miglitol acted as therapeutic agent with high clinical efficacy for diabetes in combination with other drugs and/or dietary changes [11,12]. Although this synthetic drug has significant role in diabetes, it subsequently leads to various gastrointestinal side effects, such as flatulence, diarrhea and abdominal discomfort [13].

There are many doubts about whether nontoxic natural flavones have the similar inhibitory features as miglitol, which is very important to the treatment of diabetes. Recent research indicated that some natural products are associated with decreasing the blood glucose of the diabetics, such as multihydroxyl flavonoid compound, quercetin [14]. Studies demonstrated that quercetin has good anti-type 2 diabetes ability based on rat experiment and yeast α-glucosidase in vitro [15-19]. The detailed interaction between quercetin and α-glucosidase has also been reported [20]. However, the detailed inhibitory mechanisms between different quercetin and β-glucosidases are rare so far [21]. Molecular docking technique is a key tool in structural molecular biology and computer-assisted drug design [22-24]. In the present work, a comparative study of the interaction between β-glucosidase and synthetic drug (miglitol) or natural product (quercetin) was undertaken by molecular docking simulation methods. For the purpose of comparison, four enzymes from different species were also chosen, which hold the focus of the present study and belong to the β-glycosidase family. The results obtained from this analysis not only revealed the interaction mechanism between β-glycosidase and inhibitors, but also provided some valuable information for drug design, pharmaceutical research and sequence analysis based on comparative studies.

Materials and Methods

Ligand preparation

Three dimensional coordinates of all small molecules were obtained from the PubChem database (CIDs for miglitol and quercetin are 441314 and 5280343, respectively) and their geometries were further optimized to obtain the most stable conformation by using density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the B3LYP/6-31G* level [25,26], which can be executed via Gaussian 09 program package [27]. The stable conformation was used for further docking research.

Protein preparation

Crystal structure files of cocrystallized β-glycosidases used in this study were derived from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The β-glycosidase from soil metagenome was noted as Sm-β-glu, β-glucosidase from Micrococcus antarcticus was noted as Ma-β-glu, β-glucosidase from termite Neotermes koshunensis was noted as Tnk-β-glu, and β-glucosidase from Homo sapiens was noted as Hu-β-glu. All crystallographic water molecules were removed, polar hydrogens were added, Gasteiger charges were assigned to the proteins by AutoDockTools (ADT) 1.5.6 [28] and were then converted into AutoDock readable file format.

Molecular docking

Docking and the corresponding results were carried out by using ADT 1.5.6 package and Pymol Molecular Visualization package [29,30]. The ligands were automatically prepared by detecting the flexible torsions and assigning gasteiger charges under default settings. Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA) was used for docking by using the following settings: maximum number of 25 000 000 energy evaluation, number of generation=27 000, mutation rate=0.02, crossover rate=0.80, elitism value of 1 and maximum number of iterations=300. The grid size was 60×60×60 Å with a spacing of 0.375 Å and was centered on the binding site showed in crystal structure of β-glucosidase cocrystallized structure.

The binding sites in these proteins were found to be the putative binding sites for the ligands based on the reference in the complex substance from the PDB database. Exact dimensions of the grid centre of Sm-β-glu, Ma-β-glu, Tnk-β-glu and Hu-β-glu were (x=34.253; y=1.006; z=-3.937), (x=17.849; y=20.669; z=24.342), (x=-26.809; y=82.413; z=13.836) and (x=-29.711; y=10.91; z=1.156), respectively. After 50 independent docking runs, the docking results were clustered with root mean square deviation tolerance of 2.0 Å. The top output poses were ranked by their calculated binding affinities.

Protein sequence analysis

The sequences of proteins were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website. Multiple sequence alignment is performed by Clustal software. The composition analysis was carried out by Lasergene software, and the sequence similarity analysis was performed by MegAlign software with Lipman-Pearson method.


Molecular structure and protein information

By inhibiting the ability of the patient to break down complex carbohydrates into glucose, miglitol, is an oral antidiabetic drug [31-33]. The molecular structures of small molecules used in this study were given in fig. 1. The most stable conformation was used for further docking research after DFT calculations. β-glucosidase plays an important role in degradation of cello-oligosaccharides, which influence the liberation of glucose from cellulose [34]. Basic information of four β-glucosidases was listed in Table 1. The X-ray crystallographic structures of the β-glucosidases from soil metagenome (PDB ID: 3CMJ) at a resolution of 1.60 Å, Micrococcus antarcticus (PDB ID: 3W53) at a resolution of 2.20 Å, termite Neotermes koshunensis (PDB ID: 3VIL) at a resolution of 1.15 Å and Homo sapiens (PDB ID: 3VKK) at a resolution of 2.00 Å were obtained from the RCSB Protein Data Bank. All of the protein lengths are about 500 aa. The composition ratio of Sm-β-glu, Ma-β-glu, Tnk-β-glu and Hu-β-glu are relatively similar to each other. It accounts for a large proportion for hydrophobic amino acid and polar one, sum of which own 58.06, 57.11, 58.52 and 62.26% for total number of Sm-β-glu, Ma-β-glu, Tnk-β-glu and Hu-β-glu residues, respectively. Sequence similarity analysis indicated that Hu-β-glu has similarities of 36.10, 30.70 and 45.70% with Sm-β-glu, Ma-β-glu and Tnk-β-glu, respectively.


Figure 1:The planar and optimized geometries of miglitol and quercetin.
The planar and optimized geometries of miglitol (A) and quercetin (B). All atoms are noted numerically.

Name PDB ID Length
Amino acids composition Organism
S-Basic S-Acidic Hydrophobic Polar
Sm-β-glu 3CMJ 465 40 54 158 112 Soil metagenome
Ma-β-glu 3W53 506 41 67 176 113 Micrococcus antarcticus
Tnk-β-glu 3VIL 487 41 72 164 121 Neotermeskoshunensis
Hu-β-glu 3VKK 469 46 57 167 125 Homo sapiens

Table 1: Structural Information Of β-Glucosidase For Sm-β-Glu, Ma-β- Glu, Tnk-β-Glu And Hu-β-Glu

Analysis of the binding sites of miglitol and β-glucosidases

In order to prove the reliability of the docking process, the native ligands derived from the X-ray crystallographic structures were redocked into the active sites of the four β-glucosodases using the same parameters described in this text (fig. 2). Results indicated that the active site of the Sm-β-glu (PDB ID: 3CMJ) was composed of amino acids Gln57, His158, Trp159, Asn202, Glu203, Tyr332, Glu337, Trp360, Glu441, Trp434 and Phe450, which were consistent with the published data [35]. Similar to the information reported in PDB, amino acids surrounded the active site of the Ma-β-glu (PDB ID: 3W53) were Gln25, His125, Trp128, Glu170, Cys173, Tyr300, Trp349, Glu377, Glu431, Trp432 and Phe440. From the fig. 2, it can also be seen that amino acids located in the active site of the Tnk-β-glu (PDB ID: 3VIL) were Gln45, His148, Trp149, Thr196, Asn253, Asn335, Tyr337, Trp374, Glu402, Trp444, Glu451, Trp452, Phe460 and Phe480. These were extremely identical with the reported data [36]. Similarly, amino acids Gln17, His120, Phe121, Asn164, Gln165, Phe225, Tyr309, Trp345, Glu373, Glu424, Trp425 and Phe433 were identical with data on the Protein Data Bank about the Hu-β-glu (PDB ID: 3VKK). The values of the binding free energies of the native ligands were –6.63,–8.18,–8.91 and –7.13 kcal/mol for Sm-β-glu, Ma-β-glu, Tnk-β-glu and Hu-β-glu, respectively. It was noticed that the docked structures derived from the molecular docking process in the text were very consistent with the original ligands located in the crystallographic complexes structures (fig. 3). Their similarities concluded by spin alignment method were 0.889, 0.976, 0.916 and 0.898 for Sm- β-glu, Ma-β-glu, Tnk-β-glu and Hu-β-glu, respectively (This value is between 0~1, the larger the value, the higher the similarity of the molecules). All of the root- mean-square deviation (RMSD) values were less than 2.0 Å, which suggested good models [37].


Figure 2:The bonding active sites of native ligands (cyan).
In Sm-β-glu (A), Ma-β-glu (B), Tnk-β-glu (C) and Hu-β-glu (D), respectively. Hydrogen bonds are depicted by green dashed lines.


Figure 3: The ligands derived from the X-ray crystallographic structures (purple).
Structures of 3CMJ (A), 3W53 (B), 3VIL (C), 3VKK (D) are compared with the conformations obtained from molecular docking process (cyan).

To explore the geometrical shape complementation, the poses of the miglitol in the binding pockets of the four β-glucosidases were shown (fig. 4). The values of the binding free energies of the miglitol were –7.53,–6.44,–9.09 and –4.43 kcal/mol for Sm-β-glu, Ma-β-glu, Tnk-β-glu and Hu-β- glu, respectively. In the three complexes, all small molecule poses were stuck onto the walls of the pockets and embedded into the active sites, which comprised by random coil structure, showing very good geometric complementation. In order to further reveal the key residues involved in the binding sites, the detailed interactions between the molecules and β-glucosidases were analyzed.


Figure 4:The interactive sites miglitol, quercetin and β-glucosidases.
a. migltol and Sm-β-glu, b. migltol and Ma-β-glu, c. migltol and Tnk-β-glu, d. migltol and Hu-β-glu; e. quercetin and Sm-β-glu, f. quercetin and Ma-β-glu, g. quercetin and Tnk-β-glu, h. quercetin and Hu-β-glu; drug molecules are represented by fluorescent green and protein surface were painted by atom type.

Molecular docking results indicated that miglitol was located in a cavity formed by random coil structure of Sm-β-glu. The active site was surrounded by Gln57, His158, Trp159, Asn202, Glu203, Glu387, Glu441, Trp442 and Phe450 (fig. 5A). It was shown that there existed non-bonded interactions between the small molecule and the protein, including H-bonds bonding, van der Waals and electrostatic forces. There are eleven residues around the active site of Ma-β-glu, namely Gln25, Trp126, Glu170, His125, Cys173, Tyr300, Trp349, Trp432, Glu431, Phe440 and Trp424. The polar hydrogen atoms H19, H18, H16 and H17 could interact with nearby OE1 of acidic amino acids Glu by H-bonds except H15 (Table 2). The O4 and O1 also form two H-bonds with Asn202 (1.621 Å) and Gln57 (1.836 Å), respectively. The docking result (fig. 5B) indicated that exocyclic N-C bond rotates clockwise about 100° from the optimized stable conformation, which could lead to variation of the spatial positions for other polar hydrogens. Compared with fig. 5A,obviously, it was shown that H15 can interact with acid Glu431 (2.214 Å) through H-bond (Table 3).


Figure 5: The bonding active sites of miglitol.
(A) miglitol-Sm-β-glu; (B) miglitol-Ma-β-glu; (C) miglitol-Tnk-β-glu; (D) miglitol-Hu-β-glucomplexes.

Ligand name No. of H-bonds Ligand atom Residue name Residue atom Length/Å
Miglitol 1 H19 Glu203 OE1 1.777
2 O4 Asn202 HD21 1.621
3 H18 Glu387 OE1 2.061
4 O1 Gln57 HE22 1.836
5 H16 Glu441 OE1 1.71
6 H17 Glu441 OE1 2.183
Quercetin 1 O6 Trp442 HE1 1.991
2 O7 Gln57 HE22 1.848
3 H32 Glu441 OE1 2.081
4 O3 Asn262 HD21 2.095
5 O5 Phe261 HN 2.124
6 H30 Phe261 O 1.781

Table 2: H-Bonds Between Two Drugs And β-Glucosidase From Soil Metagenome

Ligand name No. of H-bonds Ligand atom Residue name Residue atom Length/Å
Miglitol 1 H19 Glu431 OE2 2.035
2 O4 Trp432 HE1 2.005
3 O4 His125 HE2 2.245
4 H18 Gln25 OE1 2.024
5 H15 Glu431 OE1 2.214
Quercetin 1 O6 Tyr300 HN 2.201
2 H31 His301 O 1.999
3 H32 His301 O 1.961
4 H30 Glu377 OE1 2.011

Table 3: H-Bonds Between Two Drugs And β-Glucosidase From Micrococcus Antarcticus

Results showed that the binding pocket of Tnk-β-glu was mainly formed by Gln45, His148, Trp149, Asn192, Ser193, Tyr337, Trp374, Glu402, Trp432, Trp444 and Glu451 (fig. 5C). Miglitol was stabilized by the Tnk- β-glu residues via hydrogen bonds, van der Waals and electrostatic forces. And the most number of H-bonds were observed in the four β-glu-miglitol complexes, involving residues Glu451 Ser193 Glu402 Gln45 Tyr452 and His148 (Table 4). It can be seen from fig. 5C, that the location of -CH2CHs2OH group was greatly different from the one in fig. 5B, and other polar hydrogen atoms all changed their position accordingly. Polar hydrogen atoms were prone to interact with acid Glu by hydrogen bonds except the H16 atom.

Ligand name No. of H-bonds Ligand atom Residue name Residue atom Length/Å
Miglitol 1 H19 Glu451 OE2 1.922
2 O4 Ser193 HG 1.904
3 H18 Glu402 OE1 2.105
4 H15 Glu402 OE2 1.871
5 H16 Gln45 OE1 1.893
6 O2 Tyr452 HE1 1.735
7 O2 His148 HE2 2.1
8 H17 Glu451 OE1 1.733
9 O3 Gln45 HE21 1.918
Quercetin 1 H31 Asn255 OD1 2.151
2 O6 Asn255 HD22 1.995
3 H32 Asn255 OD1 1.924
4 H28 Thr196 OG1 2.208
5 O2 Ser193 HG 2.186
6 H29 Glu402 OE1 2.239
7 O3 His148 HE2 1.996
8 H30 Glu451 OE1 1.798

Table 4: H-Bonds Between Two Drugs And The Tnk-β-Glu

The number of hydrogen bonds formed between the Hu-β-glu and miglitol molecule were the least (Table 5). Among the residues involved in the active sites, there were residues Val168 and Met172 in a small α helix, which played no significant role in the stability for both antidiabetic drugs (figs. 5D and 6D). Surrounding the binding pocket of Hu-β-glu, five residues, namely Trp345, Phe179, Glu424, Asn426 and Gln427 (fig. 5D). Miglitol interacted with adjacent residues through six H-bonds, namely Glu424, Asn426 and Gln427 (Table 5).


Figure 6: The bonding active site of quercetin.
(A) quercetin -Sm-β-glu; (B) quercetin-Ma-β-glu; (C) quercetin-Tnk-β-glu; (D) quercetin-Hu-β-glucomplexes.

Ligand name No. of H-bonds Ligand atom Residue name Residue atom Length/Å
Migltol 1 H18 Glu424 OE2 1.712
2 H15 Glu424 OE2 1.74
3 O1 Gln427 HE21 1.911
4 H16 Glu424 O 2.225
5 O2 Gln427 HN 1.984
6 O3 Asn426 HD21 2.11
Quercetin 1 H31 Glu424 O 2.179
2 O6 Gln427 HN 2.057
3 H32 Glu424 OE2 1.77
  4 O7 Gln427 HE21 1.689

Table 5: H-Bonds Between Two Drugs And The Hu-β-Glu

Analysis of quercetin and β-glucosidase binding sites

In the four complexes (figs. 4E-H), all small molecules were also embedded into the active sites, displaying a very good geometric complementation. Compared with miglitol, the quercetin showed lower binding free energies for Sm-β-glu, Ma-β-glu, Tnk-β-glu and Hu- β-glu, which were –9.0, –8.62, –9.38 and –6.55 kcal/ mol, respectively, which suggested stronger inhibitory ability. This was consistent with the reported results [38]. As for Sm-β-glu, the quercetin was fixed in the binding pocket composed of residues Gln57, His158, Asn260, Phe261, Asn262, Asn330, Tyr331, Tyr332, Trp434, Glu441 and Trp442. There were mainly hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions (fig. 4A) between the complexes. The residues involved in H-bonds were mainly polar amino acids, such as Trp442, Gln57 and Asn262 (Table 2).

It was shown that residues in the binding site of Ma-β-glu-quercetin complexes was different from the one between Ma-β-glu and miglitol, whereas the ligands were all located in a cavity surrounded by random coil structure composed of Asn225, Tyr300, His301, Trp349, Glu377, Glu431 and Trp432. It could be easily observed that the most obvious variation of quercetin was the variation of the B ring compared with fig. 4A. This resulted in its H31 and H32 forming moderate H-bonds with the O atom of basic His301, which had similar length of 1.999Å and 1.961Å, respectively (Table 3). The docking results of Tnk-β-glu complexes showed that quercetin and miglitol had similar binding pockets, which composed of residues Asn192, Ser193, His148, Trp149, Thr196, Asn253, Asn255, Trp374, Glu402, Trp444 and Glu451. Most of the residues involved in H-bonds interactions were identical, such as Glu451, Glu402, Ser193 and His148. Residue Asn255 played a considerably important role in the stability of Tnk-β-glu-quercetin complex, of which the OD1 and HD22 can form three H-bonds with H31, H32 and O7 of quercetin (Table 4). Quercetin remained the greatest number of H-bonds interactions with the Tnk-β-glu among all of the β-glucosidases, which might lead to the lowest binding affinity correspondingly.

However, there was the least number of H-bonds interactions when quercetin docked into the binding pocket of the Hu-β-glu. Residues composed by the H-bonds interactions were identical to miglitol, namely Glu424 and Gln427 (Table 5). Besides, there were Asn426, Val168, Met172 and Trp345 also involved in the binding site. In summary, there were two antidiabetic drugs miglitol and quercetin can form H-bonds with these β-glucosidases via some common residues, such as Glu441 and Gln57 for Sm-β-glu, Glu402, Ser193, His148 and Glu451 for Tnk-β-glu, Glu424 and Gln427 for Hu-β-glu. It can be speculated that these amino acids are extraordinarily critical to the binding of the two ligands with glucosidase enzyme, suggesting that quercetin is a good hypoglycemic agents with low IC50 value [39-42].

Geometrical conformation analysis of docking molecules

In order to further analyze the inhibitory characteristics of miglitol, the conformations were listed before or after interacting with the β-glucosidases from different sources (fig. 7). Compared with the confirmation before docking, it could be seen from the figure that the most variation occurred was the -CH2CH2OH group, which connected with N-atom via covalent interaction. Especially the one after docking with Tnk- β-glu, -CH2CH2OH turned backward to the hexatomic ring, which made H1 interacting with residue Glu451 by H-bond. Actually, experimental results showed that their inhibition would be greatly increased when hydroxyl groups connected behind the miglitol ring [43]. Moreover, multiple hydroxyl groups that connected with the N atom could not be ignored [44,45].


Figure 7: The conformations of miglitol while after docking.
The conformations of miglitol while after docking with Sm-β-glu (A), Ma-β-glu (B), Tnk-β-glu (C) and Hu-β-glu (D).

Compared with previous docking conformation, it was shown that the –O4H18 hydroxyl group changed its geometrical conformation evidently, which might be mainly influenced by the -CH2CH2OH group. Compared to previous docking 61.1°, the dihedral angles of C7— C12—O4—H18 were –81.7°, –1.5°, 10.2° and 43.2° while after docking with the Sm-β-glu, the Ma-β-glu, the Tnk-β-glu and the Hu-β-glu, respectively. This may lead H18 to interact with acid residue Glu by H-bonds easily in all the four β-glucosidases-miglitol complexes. From the molecular electrostatic potential, which was calculated from B3LYP optimized geometry, it could be seen that the negative (red and yellow) regions were related to electrophilic reactivity and the positive (blue) regions to nucleophilic reactivity (fig. 8A). The negative charge covers the H18 atom, which is the most reactive part in the miglitol molecule. In addition, there was a pair of H-bond between O4 and HG of Ser193 while –O4H18 group turned anticlockwise about 6.8~198.4° compared with previous docking conformations (fig. 9). Residue Ser193 (Thr196) help the miglitol stabilizing its conformation by H-bonds interactions, which was in the front (inner) of an alpha helix formed by additional nine residues from Pro194 to Ala202 (fig. 10A).


Figure 8: Molecular electrostatic potential.
Molecular electrostatic potential of miglitol (A) and quercetin (B) calculated from B3LYP optimized geometry.


Figure 9: The conformations of quercetin while after docking.
The conformations of quercetin while after docking with the Sm-β-glu (A), the Ma-β-glu (B),the Tnk-β-glu (C) and the Hu-β-glu (D).


Figure 10:The interactive sites of miglitol, quercetin Tnk-β-glu Hu-β-glu.
Tnk-β-glu (a) and Hu-β-glu (b). Miglitol is modeled by magenta sticks, and quercetin is represented by a purple stick-like models.

Other hydroxyls also changed their initial conformations into their better orientations, and thus were convenient for forming H-bonds with adjacent residues, such as H4 and H5. For example, H4 changed its position nearly 90°, which lead to three H-bonds interactions between H4, O4 and Gln45, Tyr452 and His148 (Table 4). Actually, multiple hydroxyl groups played a critical role in the stabilization of the miglitol at the catalytic sites of β-glucosidases [46-49].

The geometrical conformations of quercetin were also listed after interacting with the β-glucosidases from different sources (fig. 9). It can be seen that the position of B ring changed greatly, which might have some influence on variation of other hydroxyl groups. Compared with the conformation before docking, the B ring of quercetin shifted clockwise by (a)→(b)→(c)→(d)→(e) order sequentially (fig. 9). However, this did not affect the H-bond numbers between surrounding amino acids and H1, O1, H2, O2 atoms, which were just located in the positive (blue) regions and acted as acceptors while forming H-bonds with other residues (fig. 8B). This was in accordance with the experiments, from which it can be speculated that most critical and significant role in the inhibition is contributed by the B ring of quercetin derivatives [50].

It can be observed, from figs. 6B-D that O4 can hardly form H-bonds with other residues except the Asn262 of the Sm-β-glu. Compared with fig. 9A, -OH3 group could remain the best geometrical conformation when rotating clockwise of about 30~45° centered by the C atom that connected with -OH3. For example, H3 and O3 interacted with Thr196 and Ser193 by forming H-bonds via OG1 and HG, respectively. When -OH3 group was toward ahead the B ring, the steric hindrance caused by B ring would greatly decrease. This effect was more significant while H3 was substituted by larger groups [51,52]. It was noteworthy that the B ring plays a very important role in the stability of β-glucosidases-quercetin complex. This was consistent with the α-glucosidases that the inhibition power greatly apparently increased with the replacement of hydroxyl groups of the flavones B-ring [53]. Hydrophobic interactions existed between A ring and residues Val168, which was located in a short α helix loop comprised by eleven amino acids residues from Gln165 to Asp175 (fig. 10).

Sequence alignment analysis

Finally, β-glucosidase protein sequence alignment was employed under the default settings. The results (fig. 11) revealed that although the similarities between these sequences are not very high, most of the amino acids residues related to the non-bonded interactions are conserved in the four β-glucosidases. The other three species are more conservative except the Hu-β- glu, especially the amino acids involved in forming H-bonds (indicated by blue marked letters). From the residues of the active sites, it was shown that 64.3% of the amino acids between Thk-β-glu and Sm-β-glu (Ma- β-glu) are identical, although the sequence similarities between them were only 34.9% and 33.3%, respectively. Although the sequence similarity between Thk-β-glu and Hu-β-glu was the highest (45.7%), residues that related the active sites had just only 14.3% identity.


Figure 11: Amino acid sequence alignment.
Amino acid residues related to the non-bonded interactions are marked by red letters, while the blue letters denote the residues involved in H-bonds interactions.


It is critical to study the glucosidase inhibitors for further recognizing the type II diabetes. However, there have been a lot of reports about the inhibitors of α-glucosidase [54,55], the interactions between β-glucosidase and inhibitors were reported scarcely until now. In this article, molecular docking was employed to evaluate the binding modes between two drugs (synthetic and extraction from natural product) and four β-glucosidases from different species. Results showed that the binding orientations and geometrical conformation of miglitol (quercetin) were all different in all complexes, which may be related to the differences in binding affinities.

Compared with the conformations obtained at the B3LYP/6-31G* level, two molecules show different interactions in the active sites of four β-glucosidases. Compared with the optimized structures by DFT calculations, all of the conformations more or less altered after interacting with these β-glucosidases. From the two molecular electrostatic potentials, it can be seen that the negative (red and yellow) regions are related to electrophilic reactivity and the positive (blue) regions to nucleophilic reactivity. This is consistent with the molecular docking results. From the molecular structural point of view, actually, multiple hydroxyl groups are very important to the stabilization of the miglitol at the catalytic sites of β-glucosidases. In addition, hydroxyl groups of the quercetin B-ring are vital for its inhibition power. Finally, protein sequence alignment was performed under default parameters. Although the sequence similarity is not very high between these β-glucosidases, most of the amino acid residues related to the active sites were conservative, especially the one involved in H-bond interactions.

Based on bioinformatics and molecular docking technology, the interactions between β-glucosidases and antidiabetic drugs are not only significant to further understand of the β-glucosidases, but also directive to design new inhibitors.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by the State Ethnic Affairs Commission Research Projects (14XBZ021), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (zyz2011064) and scientific research project of Gansu Province (2014B-006).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.