*Corresponding Author:
Jiali Wen
Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, China
E-mail: agawen0723@163.com
Date of Received 18 December 2021
Date of Revision 05 October 2022
Date of Acceptance 16 August 2023
Indian J Pharm Sci 2023;85(4):1110-1117  

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms

Abstract

To investigate the effect of propofol on oxidative stress injury and silent information regulator 1/forkhead box protein 1 pathway of Kupffer cells induced by hydrogen peroxide. Kupffer cells were cultured in vitro, cell injury model was established by hydrogen peroxide induction, and it was divided into three groups; hydrogen peroxide injury group (300 μmol·l-1), propofol low (12.5 μg.ml-1), propofol medium (25.0 μg.ml-1), and propofol high (50.0 μg·ml-1) groups, in addition, Kupffer cells without any treatment were normal control group. Compared with normal control group ((100.00±0.00) %, (98.19±2.48), (3.76±0.21) pg/ml, (2.46±0.25) ng/l, (2.47±0.16) pmol/mg, (1.01±0.09), (8.31±0.23), (1.03±0.08), (1.12±0.11), (2.18±0.13)), the Kupffer cell survival rate (56.24±2.12) %, tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester fluorescence intensity (54.57±2.64), contents of superoxide dismutase (2.51±0.19) pg/ml, catalase (1.23±0.14) ng/l, glutathione peroxidase in cell supernatant (1.31±0.11) pmol/mg, silent information regulator 1 (0.21±0.02), forkhead box protein 1 messenger ribonucleic acid (0.99±0.03) and protein expressions [(0.19±0.02), (0.11±0.01)) decreased significantly in hydrogen peroxide group (p<0.05), and the content of malondialdehyde (4.56±0.37) mol/l in supernatant increased significantly (p<0.05); compared with hydrogen peroxide group, the Kupffer cell survival rate ((64.79±2.49) %, (72.62±2.53) %, (84.91±2.87) %), tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester fluorescence intensity [(67.28±2.51), (80.65±2.64), (94.19±3.05)), contents of superoxide dismutase ((2.89±0.23) pg/ml, (3.24±0.15) pg/ml, (3.57±0.18) pg/ml), catalase ((1.57±0.18) ng/l, (1.88±0.19) ng/l, (2.23±0.17) ng/l), glutathione peroxidase in cell supernatant ((1.76±0.15) pmol/mg, (2.03±0.16) pmol/mg, (2.39±0.17) pmol/mg), silent information regulator 1 ((0.39±0.03), (0.52±0.04), (0.86±0.05)), forkhead box protein 1 messenger ribonucleic acid ((2.85±0.27), (4.11±0.22), (6.19±0.36)) and protein expressions (silent information regulator 1: (0.48±0.04), (0.71±0.06), (1.01±0.07)), (forkhead box protein 1: (0.45±0.06), (0.64±0.07), (0.87±0.09)) increased significantly in turn of propofol low group, propofol medium group and propofol high group (p<0.05), and the content of malondialdehyde ((4.18±0.35) mol/l, (3.62±0.14) mol/l, (2.87±0.17) mol/l) in supernatant decreased significantly in turn (p<0.05). Propofol can alleviate the oxidative stress injury of Kupffer cells induced by hydrogen peroxide and promote their survival, which may be related to the regulation of silent information regulator 1/forkhead box protein 1 pathway.

Keywords

Propofol, silent information regulator 2 related enzyme 1/forkhead box O1 pathway, Kupffer cell, oxidative stress injury

Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion (I/R) injury is a key factor affecting the success of surgery such as lobectomy and liver transplantation, which can increase postoperative mortality[1,2]. Kupffer cells are a special kind of macrophages that are located in the liver sinusoids and account for 80 %-90 % of total body mononuclear macrophages, which are clean guards for the liver, and over activation of Kupffer cells can produce a large number of oxygen free radicals and inflammation related factors, aggravating tissue damage[3-5]. Therefore, avoiding the over activation of Kupffer cells is of great importance to clinically reduce hepatic I/R injury. Studies have reported that certain anesthetics and sedative drugs such as Propofol (Pro) and dexmedetomidine have better protective effects against visceral I/R injury[6,7]. Pro, one of the commonly used intravenous general anesthesia drugs in clinic, can be used to sedate anesthesia, and recent studies have found that Pro also has antiemetic, anxiolytic and antioxidant stress effects[8-10]. But the effect of Pro on oxidative stress in Kupffer cells has not been reported. The Silent Information Regulator 2-Related Enzyme 1/Forkhead Box O1 (Sirt1/FoxO1) pathway has been implicated in cell proliferation, apoptosis, mitochondrial energy metabolism and anti-oxidative stress effects[11-13]. Therefore, in this study, we used Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) induced rat Kupffer cells to establish a cell model of oxidative stress, and to explore the effect of Pro on Kupffer cell injury repair and Sirt1/FoxO1 pathway under oxidative stress condition, in order to reveal its protective mechanism against oxidative stress injury in Kupffer cells.

Materials and Methods

Cells, main reagents and instruments:

Rat liver Kupffer cells (Cat No: HTX1973, American Type Culture Collection) were purchased from Otwo Biotech (Shenzhen) Inc.; Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Cat No: 21870084), fetal bovine serum (Cat No: 10099141) were purchased from Gibco, United States of America (USA); 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 Diphenyl Tetrazolium Bromide (MTT) Kit (Cat No: V13154), microRNA (miRNA) extraction kit (Cat No: AM1561) were purchased from Invitrogen, USA; PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Cat No: RR037A), TB Green® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Cat No: RR820A) was purchased from TaKaRa Bio, Inc.; the primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.; Malonaldehyde (MDA) assay kit (Cat No: P8242), Catalase (CAT) assay kit (Cat No: BC0205) were purchased from Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd; Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) assay kit (Lot No: 20170401), Glutathione Peroxidase (GSH-Px) assay kit (Lot No: 20160909) were purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.; Tetramethylrhodamine Ethyl Ester (TMRE) mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit, rabbit primary antibodies anti- Sirt1, anti-FoxO1, anti-Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and secondary antibodies goat anti-rabbit Immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Cat No: ab113852, ab220807, ab39670, ab181602 and ab205718) were purchased from Abcam, United Kingdom (UK); Olympus light microscope (Model: IX75) was purchased from Olympus, Japan and microplate reader (MODEL550) was purchased from Bio-Rad, USA.

Method:

Cell culture and grouping: Cells were routinely suspended, seeded in RPMI 1640 medium, incubated in an incubator at an appropriate growth density, digested with 0.25 % trypsin, and passaged. Kupffer cells that grew well were divided into five groups; Normal Control (NC group), Kupffer cells were cultured normally without any intervention; H2O2injury group (H2O2 group), Kupffer cells were treated with 300 μmol·l-1 H2O2 for 24 h[14]; Pro Low dose group (Pro-L group), Pro Middle dose group (Pro-M group), Pro High dose group (Pro-H group), Kupffer cells were treated by adding Pro 12.5 μg·mll-1, 25.0 μg·ml-1, 50.0μ g·ml-1 respectively after pretreatment for 24 h[15], 300 μmol·l-1 H2O2 was added to continue the treatment for 24 h.

Cell viability assay: Kupffer cell viability was assessed by the MTT assay, which was performed by adding 20 μl of MTT solution 4 h before the end of Kupffer cell culture in each group, with specific reference to the kit instructions. The cell absorbance (Optical Density (OD)) value of each well at a wavelength of 570 nm was measured with a microplate reader, and the cell viability (%)=(OD value of each treatment group/OD value of NC group)×100 %.

Mitochondrial membrane potential observation: The mitochondrial membrane potential was detected by TMRE based mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit, and the specific procedures were performed according to the kit instructions. The TMRE fluorescence intensities at excitation/emission wavelengths of 549/575 nm were read separately, and the ratio to the basal value was calculated.

SOD, MDA, CAT, GSH-Px of cell supernatant: The supernatant of Kupffer cells from each group was collected and MDA, SOD, CAT and GSH-Px levels were determined biochemically, the specific procedures were performed according to the kit instructions.

Cellular Sirt1 and messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) expression: Total RNA was extracted from cells, reverse transcribed to complementary Deoxyribonucleic Acid (cDNA), and stored at -20° until use. Sirt1 and FoxO1 mRNA were amplified by Real-Time quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) using the following conditions; 95° for 30 s; 95° for 5 s, 60° for 34 s, 40 cycles, the specific operation was performed according to the kit instructions. Sirt1 upstream primer sequences 5′-TTGGCACCGATCCTCGAAC-3′, reverse primer sequences 5′-CCCAGCTCCAGTCAGAACTAT-3′; FoxO1 upstream primer sequences 5′-CCTACCTTGGCACGAGAGTG-3′, reverse primer sequences CAGCAGAAGCAGATGGGATT; the internal reference GAPDH upstream primer sequences 5′-ACCACCATGGAGAAGGCTGG-3′, reverse primer sequences 5′-CTCAGTGTAGCCCAGGATGC-3′. The 2-ΔΔCT method was used to analyze the relative expression amount of Sirt1 and FoxO1 mRNA.

Protein expression of Sirt1 and FoxO1 in cells: The protein expressions of Sirt1 and FoxO1 were determined by Western Blot (WB). RIPA strong lysis buffer was used to lyse and extract total cellular protein, and the protein concentration was determined by Bicinchoninic Acid (BCA) assay and stored at -80°. Protein samples 50 μg were taken for electrophoresis in 10 % Sodium Dodecyl-Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), proteins were semi-dry transferred to Polyvinylidene Difluoride (PVDF) membranes, blocked for 2 h at room temperature, anti-Sirt1 (1:1000), anti-FoxO1 (1:1000), anti-GAPDH (1:5000) antibodies were added, and the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°, washed with Tris-Buffered Saline with 0.1 % Tween® 20 (TBST) detergent, and secondary antibody IgG (dilution ratio 1:10000) was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature, developed, exposed, observed and photographed and analyzed for band gray levels, so ImageJ software was used for gray value quantification, and the relative expression of target protein was measured as the ratio of band gray value between target protein and internal reference protein GAPDH.

Statistical processing:

Data were analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 25.0. Data that conformed to normal distribution were expressed as x? ±s, and univariate Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used for comparison of data among multiple groups, and Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK-q) test was used for further pairwise comparison. p<0.05 was considered significant.

Results and Discussion

AKupffer cell viability in the H2O2 group was significantly lower than that in the NC group (p<0.05); compared with H2O2 group, Kupffer cell viability in Pro-L group, Pro-M group, Pro-H group increased in turn (p<0.05), as shown in fig. 1 and Table 1.

Indian-Journal-intensity

Fig. 1: Kupffer cell viability and TMRE fluorescence intensity in each group.

Group Concentration (µmol·l-1) Cell viability (%) TMRE fluorescence intensity
NC   100.00±0.00 98.19±2.48
H2O2 300 56.24±2.12a 54.57±2.64a
Pro-L 12.5 64.79±2.49ab 67.28±2.51ab
Pro-M 25.0 72.62±2.53abc 80.65±2.64abc
Pro-H 50.0 84.91±2.87abcd 94.19±3.05bcd
F   350.102 280.712
p   <0.01 <0.01

Table 1: Comparison Of Kupffer Cell Viability And Tmre Fluorescence Intensity In Each Group (N=6, ).

Compared with the NC group, the TMRE fluorescence intensity of Kupffer cells in the H2O2 group was significantly reduced (p<0.05); compared with H2O2 group, the TMRE fluorescence intensity of Kupffer cells in Pro-L group, Pro-M group, Pro-H group increased in turn (p<0.05), as shown in fig. 1 and fig. 2.

Indian-Journal-fluorescence

Fig. 2: TMRE fluorescence intensity in each group.

Compared with the NC group, the contents of MDA in the supernatant of Kupffer cells in the H2O2 group were significantly increased (p<0.05), and the contents of SOD, CAT and GSH-Px were significantly decreased (p<0.05); compared with H2O2 group, the contents of MDA in the supernatant of Kupffer cells in Pro-L group, Pro-M group, and Pro-H group decreased sequentially (p<0.05) and SOD, CAT and GSH-Px contents increased sequentially (p<0.05) as shown in Table 2.

Group Concentration (mmol·l-1) MDA (mol/l) SOD (pg/ml) CAT (ng/l) GSH-Px (pmol/mg)
NC   2.18±0.13 3.76±0.21 2.46±0.25 2.47±0.16
H2O2 300 4.56±0.37a 2.51±0.19a 1.23±0.14a 1.31±0.11a
Pro-L 12.5 4.18±0.35ab 2.89±0.23ab 1.57±0.18ab 1.76±0.15ab
Pro-M 25.0 3.62±0.14abc 3.24±0.15abc 1.88±0.19abc 2.03±0.16abc
Pro-H 50.0 2.87±0.17abcd 3.57±0.18bcd 2.23±0.17bcd 2.39±0.17abcd
F   86.317 40.856 40.835 59.325
p   <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Table 2: Comparison Of The Contents Of Sod, Mda, Cat And Gsh-Px In The Supernatant Of Kupffer Cells In Each Group (N=6, )

Compared with the NC group, the expression of Sirt1 and FoxO1 mRNA in Kupffer cells was significantly decreased in the H2O2 group (p<0.05); compared with H2O2 group, the Sirt1 and FoxO1 mRNA expression in Kupffer cells of Pro-L group, Pro-M group and Pro-H group increased in turn (p<0.05) as shown in fig. 3 and Table 3.

Indian-Journal-Kupffer

Fig. 3: Sirt1 and Foxo1 mRNA expression in Kupffer cells of each group.

Group Concentration (mmol·l-1) Sirt1 mRNA FoxO1 mRNA
NC   1.01±0.09 8.31±0.23
H2O2 300 0.21±0.02a 0.99±0.03a
Pro-L 12.5 0.39±0.03ab 2.85±0.27ab
Pro-M 25.0 0.52±0.04abc 4.11±0.22abc
Pro-H 50.0 0.86±0.05abcd 6.19±0.36abcd
F   243.489 801.602
p   <0.01 <0.01

Table 3: Comparison Of Sirt1 And Foxo1 Mrna Expression In Kupffer Cells Of Each Group (N=6, )

Compared with the NC group, the expression of Sirt1 and FoxO1 protein in Kupffer cells was significantly decreased in the H2O2 group (p<0.05); compared with H2O2 group, the Sirt1 and FoxO1 protein expression in Kupffer cells of Pro-L group, Pro-M group and Pro-H group increased in turn (p<0.05) as shown in fig. 4, fig. 5 and Table 4.

Indian-Journal-cells

Fig. 4: The Sirt1 and FoxO1 protein expression in Kupffer cells of each group detected by WB.

Indian-Journal-protein

Fig. 5: Sirt1 and FoxO1 protein expression in Kupffer cells of each group.

Group Concentration (mmol·l-1) Sirt1 FoxO1
NC   1.03±0.08 1.12±0.11
H2O2 300 0.19±0.02a 0.11±0.01a
Pro-L 12.5 0.48±0.04ab 0.45±0.06ab
Pro-M 25.0 0.71±0.06abc 0.64±0.07abc
Pro-H 50.0 1.01±0.07bcd 0.87±0.09abcd
F   227.361 156.323
p   <0.01 <0.01

Table 4: Comparison Of Sirt1 And Foxo1 Protein Expression In Kupffer Cells Of Each Group (N=6,).

Oxidative stress is a key factor in the body's cells undergoing injury and excessive reactive oxygen radicals and lipid peroxides can lead to mitochondrial dysfunction in hepatocytes and induce a large number of proinflammatory factors production. Kupffer cells are important immunocompetent cells in the body, can secrete a variety of cytokines, have phagocytic function, and can also regulate liver parenchymal cell function, but it’s over activation can produce a large number of free radicals and intracellular calcium, aggravating liver tissue damage. MDA is a metabolite of body lipid peroxidation, and its level may reflect the lipid peroxidation progress; SOD, GSH-Px are the peroxidase decomposition enzymes in the body, which can reduce lipid peroxidation and scavenge excessive oxygen free radicals in the body to maintain the normal structure and function of the cell membrane, and their levels are related to the strong and weakness of body's antioxidant capacity; CAT is the hallmark enzyme of peroxisomes and catalyzes H2O2 decomposition. In this study, we found that Kupffer cell viability, TMRE fluorescence intensity, SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px contents were significantly decreased and MDA content was significantly increased in the H2O2 group compared with the NC group, suggesting that Kupffer cells were over activated after H2O2 induction, the levels of antioxidant stress in the cells were decreased, oxidative stress levels were increased, and mitochondrial oxidative stress damage occurred, indicating that this model was induced successfully and can be used for subsequent tests.

Pro is a clinically commonly used short acting intravenous anesthetic that can be used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia, and also can alleviate the oxygen radical initiated peroxidation cascade damage reaction by providing a hydrogen atom to react directly with oxygen radicals[16,17]. Liu et al.[18] reported that Pro alleviated H2O2 induced oxidative stress injury in cardiomyocytes by inhibiting mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum mediated apoptotic signaling pathway. In this study, we found that, compared with H2O2 group, with the increasing of Pro dosage, Kupffer cell viability, TMRE fluorescence intensity, SOD, CAT and GSH-Px contents increased in turn, MDA content decreased in turn, suggesting that Pro can improve the level of antioxidant stress in cells, alleviate H2O2 induced mitochondrial oxidative stress damage in Kupffer cells, promote their survival and show a dose-dependent manner.

Sirt1, a NAD+ dependent class III histone deacetylase, is highly conserved during evolution, and Sirt1 can decrease FoxO1 acetylation levels through deacetylation and activate FoxO1 transcriptional activity, which plays a role in cellular energy metabolism maintenance, anti-inflammation, anti-oxidative stress and immune regulation[19,20]. Sun et al.[21] showed that Sirt1 acts as an anti-inflammatory factor and participates in the process of Wuweizi asthma decoction to ameliorate symptoms in asthmatic mice. He et al.[22] reported that FoxO1 can regulate autophagy, oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, and has potential therapeutic value in the treatment of human cholangiocarcinoma. In this study, we found that compared with the NC group, the Sirt1 and FoxO1 mRNA levels and protein expression in Kupffer cells were significantly decreased in the H2O2 group, suggesting that mitochondrial oxidative stress injury in Kupffer cells involves regulation of the Sirt1/FoxO1 signaling pathway. Zhu et al.[23] showed that Pro attenuated oxidative stress injury in cardiomyocytes induced by cobalt chloride, which may act by activating the Sirt1/FoxO1 pathway. In this study, compared with the H2O2 group, the expression of Sirt1 and FoxO1 mRNA and protein in Kupffer cells increased sequentially with the increasing dosage of Pro, which suggested that Pro could upregulate Sirt1 and FoxO1 expression in a dose-dependent manner, relieve the inhibition of Sirt1/FoxO1 signaling pathway in Kupffer cells by H2O2, and enhance the anti-oxidative stress response, and then alleviate oxidative stress injury in Kupffer cells induced by H2O2.

In conclusion, Pro can alleviate the oxidative stress injury and promote the survival of Kupffer cells induced by H2O2, which may be associated with regulating the Sirt1/FoxO1 pathway. This study initially investigated the protective mechanism of Pro against oxidative stress injury in Kupffer cells, and the subsequent animal experiments will be conducted in the hope of providing more valuable references for clinical application.

Acknowledgement:

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2019jcymsxmx0439) and Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (KJ1726396).

Conflict of interests:

The authors declared no conflict of interests.

References