*Corresponding Author:
Padma Thiagarajan
School of Biosciences and Technology, VIT University, Vellore- 632 014, India
E-mail: padmadk4@gmail.com
Date of Submission 14 November 2016
Date of Revision 20 March 2017
Date of Acceptance 17 September 2017
Indian J Pharm Sci 2017;79(6):914-922  

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms


Polyglucoside emulsifiers have been very beneficial for blending natural oils with water for formulation of emollient creams that can serve as effective topical applicants. In the present study, the formulation process for neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) oil emollient cream was optimized by phase inversion method in terms of reduced particle size with respect to ultrasonication conditions like duty cycle, time, cavitation intensity and amplitude. Its diluted variant and the one dispersed with titanium dioxide nanoparticles were also synthesized and comparisons of mean particle size, zeta potential and electrophoretic mobility were made with three popular commercial cosmetic creams. Rheological studies showed similar results with respect to relevant parameters like hysteresis loop areas, yield stress, consistency and pseudoplasticity indices. All creams showed non-Newtonian thixotropic behavior and shear thinning feature that contribute to good flow characteristics and favorable spreading ability. The sun protection factor, determined for the titanium dioxide-loaded cream was found to be better than a popular commercial cream. It was also found to be harmless to representative skin flora as determined by disc diffusion method. Cell toxicity studies on 3T3 cell lines carried out for the oil and emulsifier showed the cells to be viable in the presence of these components. It is thus inferred that this neem emollient base cream can be safely used as a cosmetic topical applicant for skin protection.


Alkyl polyglucoside, Azadirachta indica, rheograms, sun protection factor, titanium dioxide

Emollient creams can serve as base matrices and vehicles to transport active ingredients into biological systems, by the topical route of delivery. Emollients possess optical clarity, a large surface area, are easy to prepare and thermodynamically and kinetically stable. Their transdermal usage is non-invasive, patient compliant and susceptible to self-administration. They can serve as an effective replacement for delivery of pharmaceuticals and cosmeceuticals by the oral and mucosal routes [1,2], wherein the first-pass effect of liver, that leads to untimely metabolism of active compounds can be avoided. In addition, emollients also facilitate sustained release of loaded active compounds through the dermis and epidermis as their formulations remain intact on the skin and continue to deliver them in a controlled manner over long periods of time [3]. Cosmeceuticals, loaded onto topical emollients have both therapeutic and occlusive impacts on the skin wherein they achieve healing and appealing effects [4]. They also prevent ultraviolet damage, minimize free radical formation and provide it with a smooth and uniform texture. Dosage forms for dermatological remedies are intended to promote restorative and curative action at specific sites in the epidermis.

However, many such cosmeceutical-based emollient creams like facial moisturizers, shampoos, antiaging and shaving creams and sunscreen lotions contain synthetic chemicals as preservatives and stabilizing agents. They may have several toxic and deleterious effects that have been reported, documented and debated [5,6]. In this context, it is anticipated that plant oil-based emollient creams, formulated with biobased emulsifiers, could serve as excellent matrices for supporting several cosmeceuticals [7]. Such formulations offer advantages of products with green chemistry possibly with low adverse dermatological effects. The natural carotenoids, tocopherols and other antioxidants present in them dispense requirements for extraneous addition of synthetic compounds for their preservation and stability to a large extent.

Synthesis and characterization of such a neem oil emollient cream based on a polyglucoside emulsifier, with a promising potential for dermatological applications, has earlier reported by us [8]. As a further development, in the present study, the optimization of the formulation procedure, in terms of oil:emulsifier ratio, maltase cross formation and particle size of the emollient cream under variable ultrasonication conditions like duty cycle (DC), sonication time, cavitation intensity and amplitude, have been standardized to get a best possible base matrix with respect to reduced particle size. Rheological properties of this cream, its diluted variant and one loaded with titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles have been assessed with respect to related parameters like yield stress, pseudoplasticity and consistency indices, to determine its suitability, in comparison with similar commercially marketed popular neem oil products. The sun protection factor (SPF) of the cream loaded with TiO2 nanoparticles (essential component and whitening agent in sunscreens) has been measured and compared with a commercially available sun blocking cream (SPF15). Its antibacterial activity against certain normal skin biota has also been tested to report its suitability for use as a topical applicant. Percentage viability of 3T3 (keratinocytes) cell lines in the presence of the oil and emulsifier, at concentrations used in the emollient cream, has been checked as a part of toxicity assessment studies.

Materials and Methods

Neem oil was purchased from Falcon Essential Oils, Bangalore, India. Alkylpolyglucoside emulsifier, marketed under the trade name of Montanov 202 was procured from Yasham Distributers, Mumbai. TiO2 nanoparticles were obtained from SRL Chemicals. Analytical grade ethanol, from Sigma Aldrich, was used for SPF measurements, in ratio of 40:60 with water. All bacterial media components were from HiMedia Pvt. Ltd. Ayur Herbal Moisturizer (CC1), Dove body lotion (CC2), Boroplus moisturizing lotion (CC3), and Nivea Whitening Cell Repair cream (CC4) were purchased from the local market. MilliQ water was used for all experiments. Bacterial skin flora representatives were isolated from human volunteers by swabbing the skin and the organisms were cultured onto nutrient agar plates.

Instruments and statistical analysis

Ultrasonicator (Sonics Vibra cell with ultrasonic frequency of 20 kHz, with probe diameter of 13 mm), Horiba Scientific SZ 100 particle size analyzer (scattering angle of 90° at 25°) with Windows [Z type] version 2.00 software, Systronics double beam UV/Vis Spectrophotometer (AU 2701) equipped with 1 cm quartz cell and Brookfield DV2T Viscometer (Spindle no. LV-4 (64) and sample chamber SC4- 13RPY with temperature probe and cable) were used for the experiments. Microplate reader Biorad 680 was employed for cell culture studies.

All experiments were carried out in triplicates and values were expressed as mean±SD. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA, P<0.05) was then used, along with Tukey’s test, wherever applicable to arrive at significant differences between the experimental values [9].

Emollient cream formulation

Five grams of oil was weighed into a series of conical flasks and were warmed to 75°. Then, 0.5 to 5 g of emulsifier, in increments of 0.5 g, were added to each of these flasks and mixed well. Water maintained at 75° was added in drops, with constant stirring, to all flasks to make up the total volume to 50 ml. The best oil:emulsifier ratio was fixed by visually observing the non-separation of oil or non-dissolution of emulsifier in each of the flasks. A drop of formulations, on glass slides were observed under light microscope at 40x for Maltese cross formation.

Based on these observations, the formulation with oil:emulsifier ratio of 1:0.4 was selected for optimizing the ultrasonication parameters at a pulse rate of 2/min to achieve maximum possible reduction in particle size, measured 24 h after synthesis, under these conditions. DC (3.33, 6.66, 9.99, 13.33 and 16.66%), ultrasonication time (3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 min), cavitation intensity (75.41, 150.82, 226.24, 301.65, 377.07 W/cm2) and amplitude of sonication (30, 40, 50, 60, 70%) were standardized serially one after the other in this order by using previously reported standard values for synthesis of such formulations for optimization of the preceding parameters [10]. In each case, the minimum statistically significant particle size was the criterion for selection of the best value.

The final emollient cream (EC1) was then synthesized under the completely optimized conditions. It’s doubly diluted variant (with 50 ml of MilliQ water, EC2), was also synthesized for comparison of rheological properties. Additionally, 1% TiO2 nanoparticles were dispersed in 50 ml of EC1 (represented as EC3) for further analysis. Particle size, zeta potential and electrophoretic mobility were measured for all creams including the commercial ones.

Rheology studies

Data, in terms of torque and apparent viscosity, at rpm ranging from 5 to 200 was obtained at 37° for all cream. Shear rate (1.09/s to 43.95/s) and stress were calculated using specific “System Factors” based on sensor system geometry. Dynamic shear rate mode, was operated in ascending and descending orders, and plotted against shear rate, for obtaining the hysteresis loop and its area was calculated. The plot of their corresponding logarithmic components was used to obtain yield stress by extrapolation. Similarly, log viscosity was plotted against log shear rate to obtain values of consistency indices (k), again by extrapolation. The slope gave the pseudoplasticity indices (PI) [11,12].

Determination of in vitro SPF

The procedure described by Sudhahar and Balasubramanian was used for this determination [13]. The absorbance values of cream solutions were measured from 290 to 320 nm at 5 nm intervals against ethanol: water mixture. SPF was calculated by using the following Eqn. [14]: SPF=CF×Σ290 320×EE(λ)×I(λ)×Abs(λ), where, CF=correction factor (10), EE (λ)=erythmogenic effect of radiation with wavelength λ, Abs (λ)=optical density at wavelength λ. The values of EE×I are constants.

Isolation and activity against skin flora

Skin bacteria was swabbed from volunteers after obtaining informed consent using sterile cotton swabs, spread on nutrient agar plates and incubated for 24 h at 37°. The isolated colonies after Gram staining and recording of morphological characteristics, were then sub cultured onto separate agar slants and biochemical tests were conducted for identification using standard protocols [15]. Antibacterial activity of EC1 against these (0.5 McFarland scale), was assessed by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method, 48 h after their preparation and after soaking the discs in the cream for 6 h. Sterile water was used as negative control and respective antibiotic discs were used as positive controls. The plates were incubated at 37° for 24 h and were checked for zones of inhibition [16].

Cell viability studies of 3T3 (1×105 cells/well) cell lines in presence of 5, 10 and 15% of neem oil and 1, 2, 5% of emulsifier separately in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was assessed by standard methotrexate (MTT) assay [17]. Spectrophotometric absorbance of the purple blue formazan dye was measured at 570 nm and the cytotoxicity percentage was plotted using graph pad prism 5 software for each concentration [18]. The corresponding photomicrographs were also captured.

Results and Discussion

Polyglucosides belong to a novel class of non-ionic emulsifiers that have been known for more than a century [19] but due to limitations in their large-scale production, they were largely underexploited. Recently, their commercial production, from renewable and regrowable resources like vegetable raw materials like corn, coconut oil, manioc and potato, have become feasible. Their chemical structures, with strong hydrophilic glucose residues and alcohol residues as hydrophobic parts, serve as excellent emulsifying agents for green formulations with natural vegetable oils. They have excellent dermatological compatibility, biodegradability and ecological acceptability and are also conducive to modifications of rheological properties of topical applicants. They act as liquid crystal reservoirs to improve hydration and form elastic networks with water. Hence overall stability of their formulations and long-term maintenance of skin moisture is achieved [20].

The preparation method has a pivotal role to play in the emulsification process. Thus, phase inversion emulsification has been adopted for the synthesis of the emollient cream. This method has been widely employed in development of cosmeceutical, pharmaceutical and nutraceutical products. Phase inversion is best described when adequate agitation to the components of oil in water emulsion, reverts to water in oil and vice versa. This leads to very low particle sizes which in turn confer overall stability of the formulation. Emulsification using this advanced technique results in the emergence of extremely fine droplets dispersed in the continuous phase. Traditional emulsification processes, on the other hand, is responsible for the formation of unstable macroemulsions with increased particle sizes due to coalescence, as the emulsifier is dissolved into the continuous phase and then added to the dispersed phase under appropriate agitation. Thus, in phase inversion method, the emulsifier in the system migrates from the bulk to the interface inducing “Marangoni stress” due to low interfacial tension. The Marangoni effect decelerates the expulsion of the continuous phase film between two opposing droplets (an essential step leading to coalescence) and is important phenomena to understand the emulsion morphology structure [21].

A ratio of 1:0.4 of neem oil:polyglucoside emulsifier was found to produce a Maltese cross structure (Figure 1) with hydrated liquid crystals that are arranged in a crystalline fashion to link the oil and emulsifier molecules. This stable interlinking builds an intermediate molecular ordering between the excess emulsifier, and stabilized oil droplets that are represented as interlinked crystals. This structural phenomenon confers additional stability to the system and also aids efficient lubrication upon topical application [22,23].


Figure 1: Maltese cross formation in neem oil emollient cream

Figure 2a-d shows the trend in the average particle size of the EC1 emollient cream with variations in DC, sonication time, cavitation intensity and amplitude, respectively. The least particle size (403.8±6.4 nm) was got for a DC of 16.66%. So this percentage (stop time of 5 s/30 s) was selected as it saves maximum energy during sonication and hence is more economical. During sonication, a time of 5 min gave a size average of 417.6±4.9 nm and at longer times, the sizes were higher. It is relevant to state here that size reduction, achieved during the ultrasonication, is only during the “pulse off” period. In the “pulse on” period, the particles keep growing and when it is in off mode, they collapse with high increase in local temperatures, under the influence of which the particles break down and their size is reduced. However, this happens only if the growing sizes are in the active range. If the sizes are higher, then efficient size reduction is not achieved as seen in the cases of higher sonication times beyond 5 min wherein particles achieve a higher initial size during “pulse on” period and these particles upon collapse during the off period are not able to bring about a substantial reduction in their sizes. For cavitation intensity, minimum particle size of 423.1±12.8 nm was at 226.24 W/cm2. Sizes for higher intensities were not significantly lower and hence this value was selected to save energy. Previous reports have stated that intensities with power inputs between 300 and 450 W are ideal for of non-Newtonian fluid emulsification [10]. Amplitude values between 30 and 70% produced particles sizes with no significant difference. Hence 50% was chosen as amplitudes between 45 and 65% are most suitable for efficient emulsification [24].


Figure 2: Effect of various parameters on particle size of neem oil emollient cream
a: Duty cycle, b: ultrasonication time, c: cavitation intensity, d: amplitude; Mean±SD for n=3

Particle size, polydispersity index, zeta potential and electrophoretic mobility of the optimized emollient cream EC1, DC: 16.66%; time: 5 min; intensity: 226.24 W/cm2; amplitude: 50%), and also EC2 and EC3 are shown in Table 1. Figure 3a and b represent graphical outputs of particle size and zeta potential for EC1. Formulations with zeta potentials above +30 mV and below –30 mV are most stable [25] with respect to particle size and in this context; this emollient cream is expected to be very stable.

Parameters Particle Size (nm) Poly-dispersity index Zeta Potential (mV) Electro-phorectic mobility (µmcm/Vs) Area of hysteresis loop (kPa.s) Yield stress (Pa) Consistency index Pseudo plasticity index
Cream type
EC1 430.4±23.0 1.10±0.20 –71.4±3.2 –3.335±0.27 215.7±6.74 3.4±0.2 238.3±51.1 0.4±0.06
EC2 299.8±13.0 0.80±0.10 –64.4±1.20 –3.70±0.06 101.3±3.95 3.02±0.05 80.4±10.2 0.5±0.07
EC3 469.1±8.9* 1.20±0.30 –77.7±4.60* –4.020±1.40 185.1±13.0 3.5±0.04* 240.7±25.7 0.4±0.03
CC1 445.5±11.0 0.80±1.30 –68.3±1.30 –3.120±1.50 125.9±7.88 3.29±0.1 135.5±40.5 0.6±0.01
CC2 460.8±29.0* 0.87±0.38 –70.1±2.40 –3.361±0.90 336.3±2.66 3.6±0.3* 393.4±1838*,** 0.7±0.1
CC3 412.3±17.0 1.0±2.240 –65.7±3.60 –3.40±1.10 234.9±87.0 3.3±0.005 226.3±1112 0.5±0.2

Table 1: Evaluation of emollient creams (EC1-EC3) and commercial creams (CC1-CC3)


Figure 3: Electrophoretic mobility analysis of EC1
a: Particle size, b: zeta potential

Rheology studies, viscosity values of EC1, EC2 and EC3 ranged from 250 (5 rpm) to 13 Pa (200 rpm). The commercial creams were subsequently chosen to encompass these values (350 Pa at 5 rpm and 10 Pa at 200 rpm) in order to assess the suitability of using these emollient creams as a structural substitute for the commercial ones. Non-Newtonian behaviour of all creams can be inferred from their ascending shear rate line (Figure 4a). The lines are characterized by small linear trends at very low and high shear rates, with a non-linear power law region in between and follows the Ostwald-de Waele equation [26]. This model is apt for describing material flow behaviour under a small range of shear rates as used in our experiments. The results also indicate their pseudoplastic behaviour wherein they flow instantly upon increasing stress application thus attesting their shear thinning property. This dynamic study also reveals the capacity of these creams to achieve complete breakdown of their internal structures so that a smooth flow is obtained across the skin as shear stress is increased. When the stress is brought down slowly, the structures rebuild, the creams stick to the skin and do not continue to flow over it. This recovery behaviour is measured in terms of the areas of hysteresis loops and depicts their thixotropic behaviour [27]. The areas for all creams range from 215.7±6.764 to 336.3±2.616 kPa/s (Table 1). The values are not significantly different showing similar thixotropic properties of the commercial creams and all variants of emollient creams formulated in this study. Previous reports have also shown the areas for hysteresis loops to be in the range of 118.62 kPa/s to 321.65 kPa/s and these are comparable with our values [28].

Yield stress represents the force that needs to be applied to make topicants spread effectively upon rubbing and also make a structured fluid flow. From the log-log plot of shear stress against shear rate (Figure 4b), it can be seen that yield stress for all creams range between 3.00±0.005 to 3.60±0.30 Pa (Table 1). Several cosmetic products have yield stresses between 30 and 150 Pa suggesting the need for application of considerable amount of pressure for effective flow and spreading. In case of creams used here, they can flow and spread under very low dermal pressure [29]. In case of EC1, EC2 and EC3, such low yield stress values also highlight the effectiveness of the polyglucoside emulsifier in trapping considerable amount of depot water in their internal structures. By soft rubbing, this depot water is released onto the skin ensuring better flow.


Figure 4: Plots of shear stress and shear rate emollient creams and commercial creams
(a) Hysteresis loop formation for emollient creams and commercial creams; (b) plot of log shear stress against log shear rate extrapolated for yield stress; (c) plot of log viscosity against log shear rate of extrapolated for consistency index. The slope gives the pseudoplasticity index; image EC1; image EC2; image EC3;image CC1; image CC2;image CC3

Log-log plot of viscosity against shear rate showed the consistency indices (k), represented as “k” for all creams to be between 80.4±10.2 for EC2 and 393.4±183.8 for CC2 (Figure 4c and Table 1). Apparent viscosity (CI) predicts the texture and the constancy of the material. It is also an indicative of how efficaciously formulations are able to prevent the consecutive interglobular collisions, which are often possible reasons for creaming and oil separation over a period of time. From the slope of the same plots, PI for all creams was calculated to be in the range of 0.4±0.06 to 0.7±0.1 (Table 1). PI represents the extent of non- Newtonian fluid behaviour with values ranging from 0 to 1. It is inversely proportional to pseudoplasticity of fluids and is a measure of their thinning property [30]. A unique combination of high k and low PI represent its time independent behaviour and ensures good dermal spreadability.

The determination of in vitro SPF using spectrophotometric method can be affected by factors like solvents, concentration of each active component, nature of base emollients, interaction and combination of diluents with emollient bases and skin and pH of creams. All these factors may result in variable UV absorption. For effectual prevention of UV radiation, creams must exhibit a wide range of absorbance between 290 nm and 400 nm. The UV/Vis spectrophotometric method for this determination is easy, rapid and economical. It can be an alternative for in vivo determination of SPF values in many cosmetic formulations [13]. In the present study, EC1 and EC3 creams showed a SPF of 3.257 and 5.055 respectively, inferring that these can be used to achieve a considerable UV blockage, hence serving as potent cosmeceutical agents. SPF of the commercial sun blocking cream (labelled SPF 15) was found to be only 4.560 (Table 2).

(λ nm)
290 0.015 0.0057 0.06345 0.09525
295 0.0817 0.03758 0.360297 0.1152
300 0.2874 1.2933 1.060506 1.36515
305 0.3278 0.13112 1.235806 2.34377
310 0.1864 1.08112 1.710593 0.4921
315 0.0839 0.5926 0.521451 0.11802
320 0.0817 0.11592 0.10368 0.02628
SPF 3.257 5.055 4.56

Table 2: Absorbance and SPF values of emollient cream and SPF commercial cream (cc4)

In case of activity against normal skin flora, the representative normal skin bacteria isolated and identified at genus level here were Bacillus sp., Staphylococcus sp., Micrococcus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. EC1 cream, tested on these bacteria, did not show any zone of inhibition (Figure 5) attesting its safe nature for application onto the skin. It is evident here that the emulsifier molecules containing glucoside moieties can hold water in them and mimicking the stratum corneum layer. Thus, the low molecular weight and water-attracting properties of such emulsifiers are essential in penetrating the epidermis of the skin by taking up water from the dermis region, and trapping it, therefore giving an occlusive impact on the skin without harming the beneficial bacteria present on the skin surface [16].


Figure 5: Antibacterial activity of EC1 against normal skin flora
a: Bacillus sp.; b: Staphylococcus sp.; c: Micrococcus sp.; d: Pseudomonas sp.

Cell culture studies, the results of testing different concentrations of neem oil and emulsifier on the percentage viability of 3T3 cell lines are shown in the form of bar graphs are shown in Figure 6a and b, the pictomicrographs are depicted in (Figure 7a-g). Cytotoxicity of the control and test samples is measured by a concentration-dependent reduction in dye uptake by the cells after exposure to a test material. A decrease in the uptake of dye in treated cell cultures, following a test chemical exposure, is used to determine relative toxicity and viability. The results here reveal 95.77% of cell viability for oil and 96.15% for emulsifier thus concluding that each component incorporated in our cream formulations are safe to use on dermal cells.


Figure 6: Trends in percentage viability of 3T3 cells assessed with different concentrations of neem oil and APG emulsifier
a: Neem oil and b: APG emulsifier


Figure 7: Viability of cells treated with control and the test samples
a*: Control, b-d: 5, 10, 15% of neem oil, respectively and e-g: 1, 2, 5 % of APG emulsifier, respectively

Polyglucoside emulsifiers used for emulsifying neem oil, in this study, to produce emollient creams have good comparability in terms of rheology, with similar neem based formulations that are commercially available. Their properties, in terms of dermal requirements, as topical agents, and also their SPFs are similar. Such compliance makes this green emollient formulations a very good substitute for loading cosmeceuticals and aiming for their dermal delivery. Further, the cream’s basic constituent components are nontoxic to 3T3 skin lines and also to representative normal skin flora. This favourably addresses toxicity concerns, if any, to the usage of the polyglucoside-based emollient creams. Further studies, based on effective loading of other cosmeceuticals and pharmaceutically active ingredients onto this emollient cream and study/optimization of their in vitro and in vivo release rate kinetics is under progress with promising results.


The authors thank VIT University, Vellore and Director, CSIR National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore for facilitating this study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Financial support and sponsorship