*Corresponding Author:
V. B. Tatipamula
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Department, AU College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam-530 003, India
E-mail:
tvinaybharadwaj@andhrauniversity.edu.in
Date of Submission 29 October 2018
Date of Revision 28 December 2018
Date of Acceptance 27 April 2019
Indian J Pharm Sci 2019;81(3):569-574  

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms

Abstract

Considering the antidiabetic potentiality of the moss Taxithelium napalense, the present study was undertaken to explore the chemical constituents that are present in this species. The entire moss Taxithelium napalense was extracted by ethanol and the extract obtained was subjected to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Sixty nine compounds were identified, which are reported for the first time from this species. From the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis, it was determined that the octadecanoic acid methyl ester was the chief component present in Taxithelium napalense. In addition, the total phenolic and flavonoid contents of ethanol extract of Taxithelium napalense were found to be 101.43±0.38 mg Q/g and 229.73±3.07 mg GA/g, respectively. Additionally, the inhibitory concentration 50 of the ethanol extract of Taxithelium napalense on α-glucosidase was found to be 34.5 µg/ml, while acarbose value was 29.5 µg/ml. This is the first report on the chemical investigation of the moss Taxithelium napalense.

Keywords

Moss, chemical constituents, gas chromatography, mass spectroscopy, metabolites

Mosses are non-vascular plants with rhizoids. They are grouped into the division of Bryophyte under the subdivision Musci. About 17 000 species of moss falling in 89 families and ca. 898 genera are distributed across the world and in India, about 1786 moss species are recorded till now [1]. Generally, mosses are habituated in wet environments such as alpine and rainforest ecosystems, in addition, mosses require fresh water to their reproduction [1,2]. Due to their unique habitat, they are scrutinized for biological evaluations because of their nutritional contents [2], for instance, Sphagnum palustre moss has renoprotective effects [3] and aromatase inhibitory activity [4].

Taxithelium napalense (Schwaerg) Broth, family Sematophyllaceae is an epiphytic moss. T. napalense is habituated on twigs and branches of other plants in semi evergreen forests found in palaeotropical region [5]. Earlier, the phytochemical, antioxidant and in vivo antidiabetic potential of the ethanol extract of T. napalense was reported [6] . In the present study, it was aimed to identify the active metabolites present in this moss using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. Additionally, the total flavonoid and phenolic contents along with its α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was also determined.

The specimens of Taxithelium nepalense (Schwaerg) Broth was collected from barks of mangrove, Rhizophora species from Bhitarkanika island (20°72’ N latitude and 86°87’ E Longitude) Orissa, India in March 2016. The moss T. nepalense was authenticated in the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute (NBRI), Lucknow and deposited at Bryophyte Herbarium, CSIR-NBRI, Lucknow, India with an accession number LWG-5/VB-Orissa-2016 [1].

The moss specimens collected from the mangrove plants were shade-dried. The dried lichen material was powdered using a blender and about 12 g of moss material was exhaustively extracted thrice with ethanol at room temperature. The mixture was filtered through muslin cloth and evaporated under reduced pressure to obtain ethanol extract (1.21 g, 10.08 % w/w) as a dark greenish solid, which were stored in amber colored vials and preserved at 4° till further use.

All the chemicals and reagents used in the present study were of analytical grade. p-nitrophenyl-α-Dglucopyranoside, rat intestinal acetone powder, sucrose and acarbose, were procured from Sigma-Aldrich (Mumbai, India). Glibenclamide was purchased from Aventis Pharma Ltd. (Mumbai, India).

The phytochemical investigation of ethanol extract of T. nepalense was performed on GC-MS equipment (GCMS-QP2010 Plus, Shimadzu, Europe). Experimental parameters of GC-MS system were, column oven temperature: 50°, injection temperature: 250°, injection mode: split; flow control mode: linear velocity; pressure: 29.7 kPa; total flow: 10.9 ml/min; column flow: 0.72 ml/min; linear velocity: 30.7 cm/s; purge flow: 3.0 ml/min; split ratio: 10.0. Oven temperature program was 50° hold time for 2 min, at 200° hold time for 0 min and 280° hold time for 2 min. The GC program was ion-source temperate at 210°, interface temperature at 250°, solvent cut time: 3 min, detector gain: 1.07 kV+0.20 kV and threshold of 1000.

The total flavonoid content [7] of the extracts were determined by using aluminium chloride spectrophotometric method, in which AlCl3 forms complex with hydroxyl groups of flavonoids exist in the testing sample. To the extract (1 mg/ml) or standard quercetin solution (3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 μg/ml), added 3 ml of methanol, 1 ml of 2 % AlCl3 solution, 200 μl of 1 M potassium acetate and made up to 10 ml with distilled water and incubated for 60 min at room temperature, whereas the blank contained only reagents and the absorbance was noted at 415 nm. Based on the measured absorbance of the test sample, the total flavonoid content was read on the calibration curve and the total flavonoid content was expressed in terms of quercetin equivalent (mg of Q/g of extract).

The total phenolic content [7] was estimated by Folin- Ciocalteu’s method. To the extract (1 mg/ml) or standard gallic acid solution (3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 μg/ml), added 0.5 ml of Folin-Ciocalteau reagent, 1.5 ml of sodium carbonate (20 %) solution and volume made up to 10 ml with distilled water and incubated at room temperature for 120 min and the absorbance was measured at 750 nm using spectrophotometer against blank (contained only reagents). Based on the measured absorbance of the test sample, the total phenolic content was read on the calibration curve and the total phenolic content was expressed in terms of gallic acid equivalent (mg of GA/g of extract).

The assay of α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was estimated using the method reported by Tatipamula et al. [8] in triplicate (n=3). Two microlitres of α-glucosidase from rat intestine acetone powder solution (a stock solution of 1.0 mg/ml in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, diluted 40-fold with phosphate buffer) was mixed with 20 μl of the samples at different concentrations (25, 50, 75 and 100 μg/ml solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide) to which 100 μl of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) was added in a 96 well microtitre plate and incubated for 5 min at 37°. After incubation, 50 μl of substrate (5 mM of p-nitrophenyl- α-D-glucopyranoside prepared in 50 mM of phosphate buffer, pH 6.8) was added and the entire reaction mixture was again incubated for 20 min at 37°. Thereafter the reaction was terminated by adding 50 μl of Na2CO3 (1 M) and the final volume was made up to 150 μl. The amount of p-nitrophenol released from substrate was noted at 405 nm spectrophotometrically (Spectra MAX plus 384, Molecular Devices Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Dimethyl sulfoxide and acarbose were used as control and standard, respectively. Percent enzyme inhibition was calculated using the Eqn., percent inhibition = (C–S)/C×100, where C is the absorbance of the control, S is the absorbance of sample. IC50 values of the samples were determined by plotting percent inhibition against concentrations.

After successful extraction of the whole moss material, the dried extract was subjected to GC-MS analysis. The GC-MS spectrum revealed the presence of various chemical components with different retention times (fig. 1), whereas the MS analyzes the compounds eluted at different times to detect its nature and structure of the compounds. The results pertaining to GC-MS analysis of the ethanol extract of T. nepalense lead to the identification of a number of compounds. The various compounds present in the entire stressed moss of ethanol extract of T. nepalense along with their retention time, molecular formula, molecular weight, peak area (%) and nature of the compound that were detected by the GC-MS were represented in Table 1. A total of 69 compounds were identified by GC-MS analysis (Table 1). In addition, the composition determined for the ethanol extract of T. nepalense corresponds to 63.59 % of the entire GC-MS chromatogram.

RT (min) Name of the compound Molecular formula Molecular weight
(g/mol)
Peak area (%) Nature of the compound
4.464 Hexanal C6H12O 100.16 0.10 Aliphatic aldehyde
9.686 Nonanal C9H18O 142.24 0.02 Aliphatic aldehyde
9.960 Octanoic acid C8H16O2 144.21 0.15 Aliphatic carboxylic acid
11.035 1-Dodecene C12H24 168.32 0.05 Aliphatic alkene
12.136 2-Decenal C10H18O 154.25 0.03 Aliphatic alkene
12.623 (Z)-2,4-Decadienal C10H16O 152.24 0.13 Aliphatic alkene
12.967 (E,E)-2,4-Decadienal C10H16O 152.24 0.27 Aliphatic alkene
13.579 (E,E)-2-Undecenal C11H20O 168.28 0.02 Aliphatic alkene
13.902 1-Pentadecene C15H30 210.41 0.10 Aliphatic alkene
13.950 2-Decanone C10H20O 156.27 0.01 Aliphatic ketone
14.005 Tetradecane C14H30 198.39 0.03 Aliphatic alkane
14.468 Nonanoic acid C9H18O2 158.24 0.13 Aliphatic carboxylic acid
15.258 2-Tridecanone C13H26O 198.35 0.02 Aliphatic ketone
16.441 1-Hexadecene C16H32 224.43 0.19 Aliphatic alkene
16.517 Hexadecane C16H34 226.45 0.10 Aliphatic alkane
16.878 4,5-Dimethoxy benzophenone C15H14O4 258.27 0.50 Aromatic ketone
17.580 2,4-Di-t-butyl-6-nitro-6-dodecanone C20H40NO3 342.54 0.05 Aliphatic ketone
17.922 Hexadecanal C16H32O 240.43 0.03 Aliphatic aldehyde
17.997 Methyl tetradecanoate C15H30O2 242.40 1.14 Aliphatic ester
18.780 Heptadecanoic acid C17H34O2 270.46 0.02 Fatty acid
18.857 16-Methyl-1-octadecene C19H38 265.51 0.26 Aliphatic alkene
18.933 Heneicosane C21H44 296.58 0.11 Aliphatic alkane
19.054 5-Octadecenoic acid C18H34O2 282.47 0.06 Fatty acid
19.498 Pentadecanoic acid C15H30O2 242.40 0.17 Fatty acid
19.918 2-Undecanone C11H22O 170.30 0.07 Aliphatic ketone
19.983 6,10-Dimethyl-9-heptadecanone C19H38O 282.51 0.36 Aliphatic ketone
20.159 10-Methyl-E-11-tridece-1-ol-acetate C16H30O2 254.41 0.02 Aliphatic ester
20.322 9-Hexadecenoic acid C16H30O2 254.41 1.01 Fatty acid
20.450 9-Hexadecenoic acid methyl ester C16H30O2 268.44 0.05 Aliphatic ester
20.754 Octadecanoic acid methyl ester C19H38O2 298.51 52.09 Aliphatic ester
20.849 3-Hydroxy cyclodecene C10H18O 154.25 0.12 Cyclic hydroxyl compound
21.680 Cyclopropaneoctanoic acid C11H20O2 184.28 0.28 Fatty acid
22.003 Heptadecanoic acid methyl ester C18H36O2 248.48 0.50 Aliphatic ester
23.789 Methyl octadec-9-enoate C19H36O2 297.487 0.11 Aliphatic ester
23.842 Methyl 9-cis,11-trans-octadecadienoate C19H34O2 294.48 0.08 Aliphatic ester
24.040 Ethyl (9Z,12Z)-9,12-octadecadienoate C20H36O2 308.51 0.18 Aliphatic ester
24.122 (E)-9-Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester C20H38O2 310.52 0.40 Aliphatic ester
24.425 9-Cis,11-trans-octadecadienoate-1-docosene C18H32O2 280.45 0.07 Fatty acid
25.246 Behenic alcohol C22H46O 326.61 0.08 Aliphatic hydroxyl compound
25.442 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid C18H30O2 278.44 0.17 Fatty acid
25.828 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid methyl ester C19H32O2 292.46 0.11 Aliphatic ester
25.890 6,9,12-Octadecatrienoic acid C18H30O2 278.44 0.11 Fatty acid
25.996 Oxiraneoctanoic acid 3-octyl- methyl ester C19H36O3 312.49 0.11 Aliphatic ester
26.098 Cyclopropaneoctanoic acid methyl ester C12H22O2 198.31 0.94 Aliphatic ester
26.333 8-Hexadecenal C16H30O 238.42 0.04 Aliphatic aldehyde
26.717 (9E,12E)-9,12-Octadecadienoyl chloride C18H31ClO 298.90 0.07 Chlorinated aliphatic ketone
26.779 4,4',6,6'-Tetra-tert-butyl-2,2'-biphenyldiol C28H42O2 410.64 0.05 Biphenolic compound
26.898 2-Butyl-5-methyl-3-(2-methylprop-2-enyl)cyclohexanone C15H26O 222.37 0.06 Cyclic ketone
27.251 9-Octadecenoic acid methyl ester C9H36O2 296.50 0.05 Aliphatic ester
27.348 (Z,Z)-6,9-cis-3,4-epoxynonadecadiene C19H34O 278.48 0.11 Aliphatic alkene
27.480 1-Docosene C22H44 308.59 0.12 Aliphatic alkene
27.841 1-(2,2-Dimethylcyclopentyl) ethanone C9H16O 140.23 0.06 Cyclic ketone
27.972 Heneicosanoic acid C21H42O2 326.57 0.07 Fatty acid
28.314 7,10-Hexadecadienoic acid C16H28O2 252.40 0.10 Fatty acid
29.158 9-Heptadecanol C17H36O 256.47 0.02 Aliphatic hydroxyl compound
29.463 Docosanoic acid C22H44O2 340.59 0.97 Fatty acid
29.531 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid C8H6O4 166.13 0.40 Aromatic acid
29.758 9,11-Octadecadienoic acid C18H32O2 280.45 0.04 Fatty acid
29.831 9-Octadecenoic acid C18H34O2 282.47 0.04 Aliphatic acid
30.418 1-Hexadecanol C16H34O 242.45 0.10 Aliphatic hydroxyl compound
30.492 Octadecane C18H38 254.50 0.03 Aliphatic alkane
30.915 Tricosanoic acid C23H46O2 354.62 0.10 Aliphatic acid
31.905 Pentatriacontane C35H72 492.96 0.04 Aliphatic alkane
32.342 Tetracosanoic acid C24H48O2 368.65 0.22 Fatty acid
33.018 Geranylgeraniol C20H34O 290.49 0.08 Aliphatic hydroxyl compound
33.256 1-Heptacosanol C27H56O 396.74 0.08 Aliphatic hydroxyl compound
33.516 Squalene C30H50 410.73 0.09 Aliphatic alkane
33.767 Pentacosanoic acid methyl ester C26H52O2 396.70 0.06 Aliphatic ester
34.843 Heptacosane C27H56 380.75 0.04 Aliphatic alkane

Table 1: Compounds identified from GC-MS analysis of the ethanol extract of Taxithelium napalense

ijpsonline-ethanol-extract

Figure 1: GC-MS chromatogram of ethanol extract of T. nepalense

From the GC-MS analysis, it was observed that this moss species contained mostly aliphatic fatty acids and its derivatives. Therefore, the standard way for cells to synthesize fatty acids is through the fatty acid synthesis cycle as shown in fig. 2. This cycle of eight enzymes (acyl-CoA synthase, acyl-CoA carboxylase, acyltransferase, ketoacyl synthase, ketoacyl reductase, hydroxyacyl dehydratase, enoyl reductase, and thioesterase) and acyl carrier protein) was initiated with acetic acid, CoA, and ATP by using acyl-CoA synthase as catalyst to make acetyl-CoA (fig. 2). By using another ATP and bicarbonate ion catalyzed by acyl- CoA carboxylase, which yields malonyl-CoA (fig. 2). The obtained malonyl-CoA was added to an acyl chain by catalysis with ketoacyl synthase and acyltransferase, which were usually activated with acyl carrier protein, to make an acyl chain two methylene groups longer (fig. 2). Additionally, reduction, dehydration, and reduction with ketoacyl synthase, hydroxyacyl dehydratase, and enoyl reductase catalysis, respectively, leads to a saturated and unhydroxylated acyl chain activated with acyl carrier protein (fig. 2). If the chain is of appropriate length, it was attacked by thioesterase to release acyl carrier protein, yielding the finished fatty acid (fig. 2). The various fatty acids derived by this pathway was subjected to further reduction, dehydration, and reduction reactions in the cells to yield respective derivatives namely aliphatic aldehydes, aliphatic hydroxyl, aliphatic ketones and aliphatic esters.

ijpsonline-Biosynthetic-pathway

Figure 2: Biosynthetic pathway of fatty acid
A: acetic acid; B: acetyl Co-A; C: malonyl Co-A; D: malonyl Co-A derivative; E: fatty acid. (a) Acetyl Co-A synthase; (b) acetyl Co-A carboxylase; (c) ketoacyl synthase and acyltransferase; (d) ketoacyl reductase; (e) hydroxyacyl dehydratase; (f) enoyl reductase; (g) thioesterase

The results of total flavonoid content [7] was expressed in terms of mg of Q/g of extract by using standard calibration line Eqn., y = 0.0078x+0.0297 R²=0.9989 (fig. 3A), similarly, the total phenolic content were expressed in terms of mg of GA/g of extract by using standard calibration line Eqn., y = 0.0051x+0.0082 R²=0.9982 (fig. 3B). The ethanol extract of T. nepalense contained more total phenolic content than total flavonoid content. The total phenolic content [7] was found to be 229.73±3.07 mg GA/g, whereas the total flavonoid content was 101.43±0.38 mg Q/g. In addition, the GC-MS analysis also depicted the presence of higher amounts of phenolic compounds in ethanol extract of T. nepalense.

ijpsonline-Standard-quercetin

Figure 3: Standard quercetin and standard gallic acid curves
(A) Total flavonoid content of standard quercetin and (B) total phenolic content of standard gallic acid, R2, n=3

The in vitro antidiabetic activity was assessed by α-glucosidase inhibitory assay [8] using acarbose as standard and p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside as a substrate. From the inhibitory assay, it was estimated that the ethanol extract of T. nepalense exhibited significant inhibition of α-glucosidase enzyme with IC50 values of 34.5 μg/ml, whereas acarbose with 29.5 μg/ml (Table 2). The results of α-glucosidase inhibitory assay proved the antidiabetic potentiality of T. nepalense.

COMPOUND Inhibition (%)* IC50 values (µg/ml)
25 µg/ml 50 µg/ml 75 µg/ml 100 µg/ml
TNEE 44.94±6.40 58.02±5.06 65.27±4.65 72.43±5.38 34.5
Acarbose 46.11±4.74 68.25±6.47 76.06±5.78 85.79±5.24 29.5

Table 2: α-Glucosidase inhibitory activity of tnee

To conclude, this is the first report on chemical components from stressed moss T. nepalense. This study confirmed the presence of various compounds in the moss T. nepalense and also justified the use of this moss as a remedy to diabetes in traditional medicine. This research helped to predict the active metabolites present in the T. nepalense, in addition, it also helped in establishing the chemical composition of this moss as well. From these results, it could be concluded that T. nepalense contained various bioactive metabolites. Additionally, the ethanol extract has more total phenolic content than total flavonoid content. However, the isolation of individual secondary metabolites and investigating the biological activity possessed by these would give impetus for further research on the antidiabetic potential of this plant.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the authorities of AU College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India for providing the necessary facilities to complete present work. The authors also thank Dr. Ankita Srivastava, CSIRNational Botanical Research Institute (NBRI), Lucknow for identifying the moss species collected.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References